<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Murdoch</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Murdoch</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Murdoch' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:54:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:54:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Rupert Murdoch (and Mark Cuban) vs Google</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86725/Rupert%2DMurdoch%2Dand%2DMark%2DCuban%2Dvs%2DGoogle</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_News&quot;&gt;Sky News&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skynews.com.au&quot;&gt;Australia&lt;/a&gt; political editor &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Speers&quot;&gt;David Speers&lt;/a&gt; interviewed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7GkJqRv3BI&quot;&gt;Rupert Murdoch earlier this month&lt;/a&gt;, and covered a number of topics, including search engine access to news content under the Murdoch umbrella. In short, Rupert Murdoch is looking to a day when Google won&apos;t search News Corp. stories, and people will pay for their news (again). &lt;a href=&quot;http://cij.inspiriting.com/?p=852&quot;&gt;Murdoch&apos;s views of Google aren&apos;t new&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/03/rupert-murdoch-google-business-media-murdoch.html&quot;&gt;claiming Google is stealing from News Corp&lt;/a&gt;. Murdoch&apos;s Google gambit set the internet buzzing, &lt;a href=&quot;http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/murdochs-google-gambit/&quot;&gt;as briefed on The Opinionator&lt;/a&gt;. But Rupert Murdoch isn&apos;t the only one looking for Google to fall, with &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogmaverick.com/2009/11/09/rupert-murdoch-to-block-google-smart-twitter-has-changed-it-all/&quot;&gt;Mark Cuban proclaiming that Google can be taken down&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2007/03/14/mark-cuban-google-may-not-know-it-but-they-have-already-lost&quot;&gt;again&lt;/a&gt;, or is that &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogmaverick.com/?s=google&quot;&gt;still&lt;/a&gt;?)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86725</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:54:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>MarkCuban</category>
		<category>Murdoch</category>
		<category>NewsCorp</category>
		<category>RupertMurdoch</category>
		<dc:creator>filthy light thief</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;I would like to thank you for dismissing my 22 years&apos; service in Her Majesty&apos;s Armed Forces.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86345/I%2Dwould%2Dlike%2Dto%2Dthank%2Dyou%2Dfor%2Ddismissing%2Dmy%2D22%2Dyears%2Dservice%2Din%2DHer%2DMajestys%2DArmed%2DForces</link>
		<description> In 2007, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/teenytinyturkey/2934879168/&quot;&gt;Moira Cameron&lt;/a&gt;, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ExzjllJwHU&quot;&gt;soldier&lt;/a&gt; with &lt;a href=&quot;http://topics.treehugger.com/quote/06EUcvug878JO&quot;&gt;a distinguished 22-year military career&lt;/a&gt; serving in Northern Ireland and Cyprus, was named &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/6975559.stm&quot;&gt;Britain&apos;s first female Yeoman Warder&lt;/a&gt;... a Beefeater. Unfortunately, she has also been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hnKRYHeWvU8B1IYXtycoMYnzsiiwD9BNL5085&quot;&gt;the target of sexist workplace harassment&lt;/a&gt; by several of her 34 fellow Beefeaters, all of whom are supposedly mature forty+ year old veterans. This has led to two Beefeaters being suspended with an additional Beefeater currently under investigation. Equally unfortunately, Rupert Murdoch&apos;s Sun &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2710901/Female-yeoman-Beefeater-bullies-made-me-go-bald.html&quot;&gt;is adding to her humiliation&lt;/a&gt;, while Reuters has put the &quot;Ha, ha!&quot; in harassment by filing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSTRE5A151U20091103&quot;&gt;the story&lt;/a&gt; in their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/news/oddlyEnough&quot;&gt; &quot;humorous&quot; Oddly Enough category&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86345</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:27:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigots</category>
		<category>idiots</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>Murdoch</category>
		<category>overt</category>
		<category>sexism</category>
		<dc:creator>markkraft</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Murdoch v. the BBC</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84662/Murdoch%2Dv%2Dthe%2DBBC</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug/30/robert-peston-james-murdoch-bbc"&gt;&quot;If you think you can get fucking angry, I can get fucking angry.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; James Murdoch, Chairman of News Corp, gave this year&apos;s MacTaggart Lecture &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/video/2009/aug/29/james-murdoch-edinburgh-festival-mactaggart&quot;&gt;(vid)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/comment/james-murdochs-mactaggart-speech/5004990.article&quot;&gt;(transcript)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt; in which he delivered a broadside on the role of the BBC, accusing it of &apos;dumping&apos; news on the commercial market.  An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2009/08/what_future_for_media_and_jour.html&quot;&gt;alternative view was given by the BBC&apos;s Robert Peston,&lt;/a&gt; who asked &quot;Should we be relaxed if &apos;can&apos;t pay&apos; means &apos;can&apos;t know&apos;?&quot; Their after-dinner discussions led to a &apos;vigorous exchange of views.&apos;

There was a &lt;a href=&quot;bbc%20http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/6111007/James-Murdoch-doesnt-go-far-enough-slash-the-BBCs-budget-by-a-third.html&quot;&gt;mixed &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2009/aug/31/charging-for-content-bbc&quot;&gt;reception &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b788da8c-95c4-11de-90e0-00144feabdc0.html&quot;&gt;to the speech&lt;/a&gt; in the UK media, and even The Wire&apos;s dominic West &lt;a href=&quot;http://deadlinescotland.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/9104-1726/&quot;&gt;got in on the act.&lt;/a&gt;

Previous MacTaggart speakers include &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-790841440769145720&quot;&gt;Dennis Potter&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1561287/In-full-Jeremy-Paxmans-MacTaggart-Lecture.html&quot;&gt;Jeremy Paxman,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2005/aug/22/edinburghtvfestival2005.bbc&quot;&gt;amongst &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mgeitf.co.uk/home/thefestival/about-the-festival.aspx/past_mactaggart_lecture_speakers&quot;&gt;others.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84662</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:00:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>lecture</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>newscorp</category>
		<category>peston</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>Jakey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Here are our guests.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66312/Here%2Dare%2Dour%2Dguests</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v17XLl1VVPE&quot;&gt;Live footage&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(in Georgian)&lt;/small&gt; as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL0761596820071107&quot;&gt;special police forces&lt;/a&gt; shut down dissident Georgian TV station IMEDI &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8SP0JJ03&amp;show_article=1&amp;lst=1&quot;&gt;amid Tbilisi protests&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHxQZmMRysU&quot;&gt;the anchor staunchly trods on&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(transl. English by RussiaToday)&lt;/small&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geotimes.ge/index.php?m=home&amp;newsid=7610&quot;&gt;IMEDI TV is co-owned by News Corp&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66312</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:05:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>andthebandplayedon</category>
		<category>dissent</category>
		<category>dissident</category>
		<category>dissidents</category>
		<category>fox</category>
		<category>foxnews</category>
		<category>georgia</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newscorp</category>
		<category>newscorporation</category>
		<category>protest</category>
		<category>protests</category>
		<category>rupertmurdoch</category>
		<category>saakasjvili</category>
		<category>tbilisi</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Journalism etiquette</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63186/Journalism%2Detiquette</link>
		<description> Since Rupes went to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s1916646.htm&quot;&gt;great lengths&lt;/a&gt; to protect Wendi, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jointhemediacircus.com/mediacircus/2007/07/deng-fever-and-.html&quot;&gt;see some other examples&lt;/a&gt; of newspaper self-censorship  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63186</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:25:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Deng</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>Murdoch</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<dc:creator>Geezum Crowe</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fox in Print</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62697/Fox%2Din%2DPrint</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thebusinessonline.com/Document.aspx?id=F3C68A81-C541-4FA2-AC53-A3F052978B94"&gt;Newsfilter: Murdoch Buys The Wall Street Journal/Dow Jones&lt;/a&gt; After some protests from editors about what sort of control News Corp. would have over the paper, a deal has been reached with the Bancroft family that runs the paper to sell for $5 billion.   Murdoch gave up some demands for editorial control but still has the ability to hire and fire editors at will, making this the same sort of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/07/02/070702fa_fact_auletta&quot;&gt;fig leaf agreement&lt;/a&gt; he made with the Times of London.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62697</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 08:31:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>control</category>
		<category>corp</category>
		<category>fox</category>
		<category>journal</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>street</category>
		<category>wall</category>
		<dc:creator>destro</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wall Street Journal owners officially considering joining the Borg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61686/Wall%2DStreet%2DJournal%2Downers%2Dofficially%2Dconsidering%2Djoining%2Dthe%2DBorg</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-bancroft-family-will-meet-with-murdoch-to-discuss-news-corp-bid-for-dj/"&gt;Wall Street Journal owners officially considering joining the Borg&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Minority owner Jim Ottoway &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117847597734093670.html&quot;&gt;vehemently opposed&lt;/a&gt;. One wonders what the opinion of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200704110012&quot;&gt;Senator from New York&lt;/a&gt; is?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61686</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:01:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>clinton</category>
		<category>fox</category>
		<category>journal</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>street</category>
		<category>wall</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Foxy &apos;doch hosts hill funder</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51737/Foxy%2Ddoch%2Dhosts%2Dhill%2Dfunder</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Murdoch&quot;&gt;Rupert Murdoch&lt;/a&gt; Is the CEO of Fox News&apos;s parent company, News Corp., and owns a controlling interest.  So it might surprise you that he&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12692606/&quot;&gt;hosting a fundraiser for Hillary Clinton&lt;/a&gt;.  Is he simply &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/opinion/article_21218772.shtml&quot;&gt;rewarding a reliable big-business vote&lt;/a&gt;, Or does he see a change in the winds? He tends to support who&apos;s ever in power, including &quot;Liberal&quot; Tony Blair and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.danwei.org/breaking_news/disney_and_news_corp_in_tears.php&quot;&gt;Chinese Government&lt;/a&gt;.  Or maybe he&apos;s just being friendly.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51737</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 23:50:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fox</category>
		<category>hillary</category>
		<category>hillaryclinton</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>rupertmurdoch</category>
		<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A Presidency in Shadow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49238/A%2DPresidency%2Din%2DShadow</link>
		<description> Notice:  henceforth, the Minister of War shall address the people only through the Ministry of Truth.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/02/16/chn_ftz.html&quot;&gt;The story-behind-the-story of the Vice President&apos;s hunting mishap is the denigration of the MSM&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;TM&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt; as the traditional proxy of the public interest&lt;/a&gt;, says NYU journalism professor and media critic Jay Rosen&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/02/15/national/w201800S25.DTL&quot;&gt;&quot;It strikes me that the &lt;i&gt;Corpus Christi Caller-Times&lt;/i&gt; is just as valid a news outlet as &lt;i&gt;The New York Times&lt;/i&gt; is,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Cheney told cherry-picked Fox &quot;News&quot; correspondent Brit Hume yesterday.  GOP spokesperson Mary Matalin underlined the point by saying that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/15/AR2006021502401.html?nav=hcmodule&quot;&gt;Cheney considered holding a news conference, but that &quot;would have meant a lot of grandstanding&quot; by reporters&lt;/a&gt;;  Donald Rumsfeld often goes even farther, claiming that terrorist organizations &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2006/tr20060203-12436.html&quot;&gt;manipulate the American press directly through &quot;media committees.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  Judging by the administration&apos;s contempt for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_estate&quot;&gt;Fourth Estate&lt;/a&gt;, says Rosen, &quot;The public visibility of the presidency itself is under revision. More of it lies in shadow all the time. Non-communication has become the standard procedure, not a breakdown in practice but the essence of it.&quot;  Even arch-conservative pundits like George Will are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/15/AR2006021502003.html&quot;&gt;starting to get nervous&lt;/a&gt; about the lack of check and balances under the current regime.  There&apos;s no doubt that the White House press corps seems angrier these days -- but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?bid=1&amp;pid=59769&quot;&gt;are they missing the bigger stories&lt;/a&gt; by focusing their wrath on Scott McClellan&apos;s birdshot spin?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49238</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:22:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1984</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>FourthEstate</category>
		<category>Fox</category>
		<category>freedomofthepress</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Hume</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>Murdoch</category>
		<category>Orwell</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<category>presscorps</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Whittington</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>All good things...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43559/All%2Dgood%2Dthings</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8BDRI4O0.htm?campaign_id=apn_tech_down&amp;amp;chan=tc"&gt;Evil Empire Buys Benign Annoyance&lt;/a&gt; Rupert Murdoch&apos;s Intermix Media is buying MySpace for half a billion dollars. I can barely conceal my excitement.  Did I tell you Eliot Spitzer has already fined them for secretly installing spyware? Thanks, Tom.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43559</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:37:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>myspace</category>
		<dc:creator>trinarian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s a basic irony, folks...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41735/Its%2Da%2Dbasic%2Dirony%2Dfolks</link>
		<description> I&apos;m amused by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,31-2005200954,00.html&quot;&gt;today&apos;s Editorial in The Sun&lt;/a&gt;. It starts off with how a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,19809-1595686,00.html&quot;&gt;protest vote against Labour&lt;/a&gt; may mean &apos;you could be signing a young person&apos;s death warrant&apos; due to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/quote.jsp?id=84&quot;&gt;Liberal Democrat party&apos;s drugs policy&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The second half of the newspaper&apos;s editorial is a tribute to &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4505047.stm&quot;&gt;Anthony Wakefield&lt;/a&gt;... whose death came, of course, as part of the Blair government&apos;s war in Iraq... a basic irony that the newspaper has failed to pick up on. [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2005/05/desperate.asp&quot;&gt;Bloggerheads&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For those who don&apos;t know, The Sun - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3255626a12,00.html&quot;&gt;which backs Blair&lt;/a&gt;, though not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.backingblair.co.uk&quot;&gt;like this&lt;/a&gt; - is the UK&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.netimperative.com/2004/09/13/Online_readers_Sun&quot;&gt;biggest selling newspaper&lt;/a&gt; and is owned by Rupert Murdoch.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41735</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 22:04:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blair</category>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>labour</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>tapeguy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>F*ck The People, This Is Business.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28608/Fck%2DThe%2DPeople%2DThis%2DIs%2DBusiness</link>
		<description> Rupert Murdoch, The Guardian Newspaper Group, magazine group IPC (and others) have formed an unlikely coalition, the &lt;i&gt;British Internet Providers Association&lt;/i&gt;, in order to do one thing: &lt;a href=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,1051008,00.html&quot;&gt;decimate the BBC Online website, and protect their own online ventures&lt;/a&gt;. They demand that &quot;&lt;i&gt;BBC Online should be scaled back to being a &apos;news portal&apos; and...should release its internet source code to commercial organisations.&lt;/i&gt;&quot; Spin-off projects such as iCan, the grassroots political site which the BBC is set to launch in October, would be trashed, and the BBC&apos;s use of its website to promote programmes, magazines and services would be restricted. In addition the BBC would face a cost ceiling on
its online budget and be forced to &quot;&lt;i&gt;provide links to the news services of its competitors&lt;/i&gt;.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
The Governement&apos;s closing date for submissions to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.culture.gov.uk/global/press_notices/archive_2003/dcms_bbci_review.htm&quot;&gt;BBC Online review&lt;/a&gt; is November 17th, 2003.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28608</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:41:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>bbconline</category>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>ipc</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>onlinenews</category>
		<category>rupertmurdoch</category>
		<dc:creator>Blue Stone</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19168/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/08/15/1029113970413.html"&gt;Screw you&lt;/a&gt; worldcom, enron. In Australia we &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt; how to make a loss. AU$11,962,000,000 in fact. One has to wonder how much of this is a &quot;paper loss&quot; or how much of this is &quot;creative accounting for tax purposes&quot;. Or just where the hell did the money go?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19168</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:37:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>accounting</category>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>newscorp</category>
		<category>rupertmurdoch</category>
		<dc:creator>Neale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11901/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011029/ts/gm_hughes.html&quot;&gt;Murdoch backs down&lt;/a&gt;. DirectTV is now Echostars. I&apos;m not at all happy about this. Do we really need another monopoly?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11901</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:41:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DirectTV</category>
		<category>Murdoch</category>
		<category>RupertMurdoch</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


