<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Muslim and terror</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Muslim+terror</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Muslim' and 'terror' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:00:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:00:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>US Muslims more peaceful than their fellow citizens?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61437/US%2DMuslims%2Dmore%2Dpeaceful%2Dthan%2Dtheir%2Dfellow%2Dcitizens</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10330400"&gt;Surprising findings in Pew study of US Muslims.&lt;/a&gt; The interweb is all atwitter over some of the findings of a Pew Research Center &lt;a href=&quot;http://pewresearch.org/pubs/483/muslim-americans&quot;&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; of the attitudes of Muslim-Americans (the most comprehensive one done yet).  While most of the findings should be welcomed (US Muslims are well off, appreciate being here, have non-Muslim friends, shun extremism, etc.), there is one troubling statistic: 6% of US Muslims - and 15% of US Muslims under 30 - believe that  &quot;bombing and other attacks intentionally aimed at civilians&quot; are &quot;often or sometimes justified&quot;.  Sounds bad, but what happens when you ask the same question of non-Muslim Americans?  Turns out that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0223/p09s01-coop.html&quot;&gt; 24% of all Americans agreed&lt;/a&gt; - four times the 6% of US Muslims who share that view.  So are US Muslims more peaceful than their non-Muslim neighbors?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61437</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:00:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bombing</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>muslim</category>
		<category>pew</category>
		<category>suicide</category>
		<category>survey</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<dc:creator>laz-e-boy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How do you pronounce &apos;Kaf-ka-esque&apos;?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48311/How%2Ddo%2Dyou%2Dpronounce%2DKafkaesque</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/15/AR2006011500940_pf.html"&gt;&quot;Yousry is not a practicing Muslim. He is not a fundamentalist,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; prosecutor Anthony Barkow acknowledged in his closing arguments to a jury in federal district court in Manhattan earlier this year&lt;strong&gt;. &quot;Mohammed Yousry is not someone who supports or believes in the use of violence.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; So why is Yousry now awaiting sentencing in March, when he could face 20 years in prison for translating a letter from imprisoned Muslim cleric Omar Abdel Rahman to Rahman&apos;s lawyer in Egypt?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48311</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:50:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>injustice</category>
		<category>Justice</category>
		<category>Muslim</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>Yousry</category>
		<dc:creator>dash_slot-</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dick Cheney&apos;s Pre-Emptive Nuclear War on Terror</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43824/Dick%2DCheneys%2DPreEmptive%2DNuclear%2DWar%2Don%2DTerror</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html"&gt;In case of emergency, nuke Iran.&lt;/a&gt; From the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident/vpphotoessay/troops/06.html&quot;&gt;folks&lt;/a&gt; who brought you &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.lemoyne.edu/~hevern/weblog/photos/mission_accomplished.jpg&quot;&gt;Operation Iraqi Freedom&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/30/cheney.iraq/&quot;&gt;&quot;last throes&quot;&lt;/a&gt; of the insurgency, the latest strategy for enhancing homeland security and US global standing is to launch a nuclear first-strike against Iran in the event of another 9/11-style attack -- whether Iran has ties to the attackers or not.  As Juan Cole points out, turning a Shiite Muslim nation into the next Hiroshima &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juancole.com/2005/07/consequences-of-nuking-iran-readers.html&quot;&gt;could have disagreeable consequences&lt;/a&gt;.  (First reported by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amconmag.com/&quot;&gt;American Conservative&lt;/a&gt;, not your typical liberal rag, and via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/7/22/164841/163&quot;&gt;DailyKos&lt;/a&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43824</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:46:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>first-strike</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>juancole</category>
		<category>muslim</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>shiite</category>
		<category>sunni</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Mumbai Blasts.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27934/Mumbai%2DBlasts</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://sify.com/news_info/news/mumbaiblasts/index.php?vsv=573"&gt;The Bombay(Mumbai) blasts.&lt;/a&gt; Why detonate two car-bombs in Bombay?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20030826&amp;fname=raman&amp;sid=1&quot;&gt; Destabilize the economy creating a climate for terror.  &lt;/a&gt;  Terror attacks have become &lt;a href=&quot;http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?msid=149887&quot;&gt;commonplace&lt;/a&gt; in parts of India.  The US condemned the Bombay attack- Powell called Indian officials.  But, it seems like India should do more before if it wants broader US support.  As the WSJ editorial page put it- &quot;We think India could have helped build even closer U.S. ties had it decided to send troops to Iraq.  The U.S. has driven a wedge into the center of Muslim terrorism with its occupation of Iraq, and it is looking to see who its friends really are.&quot;  What is the lesson from all of this to the Indian government?  What would you do if you were running India?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27934</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:43:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bombay</category>
		<category>india</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>mumbai</category>
		<category>muslim</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<dc:creator>SandeepKrishnamurthy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


