<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with NASAwatch</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/NASAwatch</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'NASAwatch' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:20:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:20:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>NASA to ground many of its sites</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34883/NASA%2Dto%2Dground%2Dmany%2Dof%2Dits%2Dsites</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=13326"&gt;NASA to consolidate all their sites into the nasa.gov portal&lt;/a&gt; The argument for change is that users will be served better by a single website because the agency&apos;s various sites vary in quality and content. 

But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasawatch.com/misc/07.08.04.web.html&quot;&gt;scientists and fans at NASAWatch&lt;/a&gt; say consolidation into a single NASA portal - which is more suited as collection press releases rather than in-depth information - will greatly reduce the amount of public information available from NASA. Is consolidation a good idea or is it just a power grab/manipulation by NASA administrators?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34883</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:20:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>consolidation</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>nasa.gov</category>
		<category>NASAwatch</category>
		<category>portal</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>stevis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


