<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with NSA and eavesdropping</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/NSA+eavesdropping</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'NSA' and 'eavesdropping' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:49:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:49:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/77239/Quis%2Dcustodiet%2Dipsos%2Dcustodes</link>
		<description> The National Security Agency is building a&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsa.gov/releases/data_center.cfm&quot;&gt; data center&lt;/a&gt; in San Antonio that&#8217;s the size of the Alamodome. Microsoft has opened an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=208403723&quot;&gt;11-acre data center&lt;/a&gt; a few miles away. Coincidence? Not according to author &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Bamford&quot;&gt;James Bamford&lt;/a&gt;, who probably knows more about the NSA than any outsider. Bamford&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0385521324/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;new book&lt;/a&gt; reports that the biggest U.S. spy agency wanted assurances that Microsoft would be in San Antonio before it moved ahead with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Cryptology_Center&quot;&gt;Texas Cryptology Center&lt;/a&gt;. Bamford notes that under current law, the NSA could legally tap into Microsoft&#8217;s data without a court order. Whatever you do, don&apos;t take pictures of it the spy building unless you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacurrent.com/news/story.asp?id=69607&quot;&gt;want to be taken in for questioning.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.77239</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:49:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computer</category>
		<category>datamining</category>
		<category>eavesdropping</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>nsa</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>texas</category>
		<dc:creator>up in the old hotel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>NSA Has &#8216;Routinely&#8217; Listened In On Americans&#8217; Phone Calls, Passed Around &#8216;Salacious&#8217; Bits</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75517/NSA%2DHas%2D%3FRoutinely%3F%2DListened%2DIn%2DOn%2DAmericans%3F%2DPhone%2DCalls%2DPassed%2DAround%2D%3FSalacious%3F%2DBits</link>
		<description> &quot;Ever since President Bush confirmed the existence of a National Security Administration wiretapping program in late 2005, he has insisted it is aimed only at terrorists&#8217; calls and protects Americans&#8217; civil liberties (&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/01/nsa.spying/index.html&quot;&gt;This is a limited program &lt;/a&gt;designed to prevent attacks on the United States of America &#8212; and I repeat: limited.&quot;)....However, &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5987804&amp;page=1&quot;&gt;ABC News&lt;/a&gt; reports [&lt;small&gt;text with embedded video&lt;/small&gt;] that the NSA frequently listened to and transcribed the private phone calls of Americans abroad....These conversations included those of American soldiers stationed in Iraq and American aid workers abroad, such as Doctors Without Borders.&quot;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/09/wiretapping-whistleblowers/&quot;&gt;*&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; A former military intercept operator: &quot;These were just really everyday, average, ordinary Americans who happened to be in the Middle East....personal, private things with Americans who are not in any way, shape or form associated with anything to do with terrorism....[We] routinely shared salacious or tantalizing phone calls that had been intercepted....&apos;Hey, check this out...there&#8217;s good phone sex or there&#8217;s some pillow talk, pull up this call, it&#8217;s really funny, go check it out. It would be some colonel making pillow talk and we would say, &apos;Wow, this was crazy.&apos;&quot; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75517</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:51:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilLiberties</category>
		<category>Eavesdropping</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Privacy</category>
		<category>Whistleblowers</category>
		<category>WireTapping</category>
		<dc:creator>ericb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You had to live -- did live, from the habit that became instinct and the assumption that every sound you made was overheard.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58824/You%2Dhad%2Dto%2Dlive%2Ddid%2Dlive%2Dfrom%2Dthe%2Dhabit%2Dthat%2Dbecame%2Dinstinct%2Dand%2Dthe%2Dassumption%2Dthat%2Devery%2Dsound%2Dyou%2Dmade%2Dwas%2Doverheard</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/index.html"&gt;For Your Eyes Only? Allegations that the government is reading your e-mails, with the help of AT&amp;T.&lt;/a&gt; The latest episode of &lt;a href=http://www.pbs.org/now/&gt;NOW&lt;/a&gt; did a good piece on the &lt;a href=http://texaskaos.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2644&gt;NSA&apos;s domestic surveillance program&lt;/a&gt; (previously discussed &lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/57937/Your-world-delivered-to-the-NSA&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.)  It can be viewed on their website.  Meanwhile, Canadian human rights attorney Maureen Webb has written a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0872864766/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;new book&lt;/a&gt; on the scope of government surveillance, and found that &lt;a href=http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/20/1523257&gt;the use of sophisticated methods to search for terrorists is not identifying the right suspects&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58824</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:33:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ATT</category>
		<category>BigBrother</category>
		<category>CivilLiberties</category>
		<category>Eavesdropping</category>
		<category>EFF</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Privacy</category>
		<category>Surveillance</category>
		<category>Telecommunications</category>
		<category>Terrorism</category>
		<category>Warrantless</category>
		<category>Whistleblower</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Your world, delivered to the NSA</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57937/Your%2Dworld%2Ddelivered%2Dto%2Dthe%2DNSA</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2007/1/20/05952/8776"&gt;AT&amp;T Ducks Accountability.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=http://informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=5MVW55OMHE3GGQSNDLRSKHSCJUNN2JVN?articleID=196902271&gt;Lawsuits, Questions&lt;/a&gt; Follow &lt;a href=http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/&gt;NSA Surveillance Approval.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57937</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:59:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Advertising</category>
		<category>ATT</category>
		<category>BigBrother</category>
		<category>Cingular</category>
		<category>CivilLiberties</category>
		<category>DeathStar</category>
		<category>Ducks</category>
		<category>Eavesdropping</category>
		<category>EFF</category>
		<category>Fascism</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Privacy</category>
		<category>Surveillance</category>
		<category>Telecommunications</category>
		<category>Terrorism</category>
		<category>Warrantless</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The New Hows and Whys of Global Eavesdropping</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40096/The%2DNew%2DHows%2Dand%2DWhys%2Dof%2DGlobal%2DEavesdropping</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/02/books/02grim.html?pagewanted=all&amp;amp;oref=login"&gt;The New Hows and Whys of Global Eavesdropping&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;i&gt;book review: for access: &quot;legion&quot; &quot;legion&quot;&lt;/i&gt;] Remember chatter? After 9/11, it was all over the news. For months, snatches of cellphone conversations in Karachi or Tora Bora routinely made the front page. Television newscasters could chill the blood instantly by reporting on &quot;increased levels of chatter&quot; somewhere in the ether. But what exactly was it? Who was picking it up, and how were they making sense of it?

Patrick Radden Keefe does his best to answer these questions and demystify a very mysterious subject in &quot;Chatter,&quot; a beginner&apos;s guide to the world of electronic espionage and the work of the National Security Agency, responsible for communications security and signals intelligence, or &quot;sigint.&quot; In a series of semiautonomous chapters, he describes Echelon, the vast electronic intelligence-gathering system operated by the United States and its English-speaking allies; surveys the current technology of global eavesdropping; and tries to sort out the vexed issue of privacy rights versus security demands in a world at war with terrorism.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40096</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:51:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chatter</category>
		<category>eavesdropping</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>spy</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


