<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with NYTimes and USPresident</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/NYTimes+USPresident</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'NYTimes' and 'USPresident' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:53:08 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:53:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>An Executive Order Along Torture&apos;s Path</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38012/An%2DExecutive%2DOrder%2DAlong%2DTortures%2DPath</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf&quot; title=&quot;&apos;&apos;I have been told that all interrogation techniques previously authorized by the Executive Order are still on the table but that certain techniques can only be used if very high-level authority is granted.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Request for guidance regarding the OGC&apos;s EC regarding detainee abuse, referring to &#8220;interrogation techniques made lawful&#8221; by the &#8220;President&apos;s Executive Order.&#8221;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; comes  from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/&quot;&gt;Records Released in Response to Torture FOIA Request&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/news/NewsPrint.cfm?ID=17216&amp;c=206&quot; title=&quot;The two-page e-mail that references an Executive Order states that the President directly authorized interrogation techniques including sleep deprivation, stress positions, the use of military dogs, and &apos;&apos;sensory deprivation through the use of hoods, etc.&apos;&apos; The ACLU is urging the White House to confirm or deny the existence of such an order and immediately to release the order if it exists. The FBI e-mail, which was sent in May 2004 from &apos;&apos;On Scene Commander--Baghdad&apos;&apos; to a handful of senior FBI officials, notes that the FBI has prohibited its agents from employing the techniques that the President is said to have authorized. &quot;&gt;Smoking Gun ?&lt;/a&gt; asks the ACLU--or just another stepping stone from &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6733558/site/newsweek/print/1/displaymode/1098/&quot; title=&quot;In a Jan. 25, 2002, memo to Bush, Gonzales said the new war on terror &apos;&apos;renders obsolete Geneva&apos;s strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners.&apos;&apos; Some State Department lawyers charge that Gonzales misrepresented so many legal considerations and facts (including hard conclusions by State&apos;s Southeast Asia bureau about the nature of the Taliban) that one lawyer considers the memo to be &apos;&apos;an ethical breach.&apos;&apos; In response, a senior White House official says Gonzales&apos;s memo was only a &apos;&apos;draft&apos;&apos; and just one part of an extensive decision-making process in which all views were aired.&quot;&gt;Torture&apos;s Path&lt;/a&gt; ? As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/16/politics/16jag.html?ei=5090&amp;en=5016ee06544b6bc4&amp;ex=1260939600&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot; title=&quot;Several former high-ranking military lawyers say they are discussing ways to oppose President Bush&apos;s nomination of Alberto Gonzales to be attorney general, asserting that Gonzales&apos;s supervision of legal memorandums that appeared to sanction harsh treatment of detainees, even torture, showed unsound legal judgment.&quot;&gt;Ex-Military Lawyers Object to Bush Cabinet Nominee&lt;/a&gt;, and in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2004/12/17/memo/print.html&quot; title=&quot;Renewed exposure of prisoner abuse, torture and even murder by American military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan is widening already deep divisions between the Pentagon and the intelligence community -- and creating an untenable situation for Donald Rumsfeld, the beleaguered secretary of defense. A recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &apos;&apos;marching orders&apos;&apos; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from the defense secretary himself. In recent days, a coalition of human rights groups led by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights has brought new cases of abuse to public attention. Using the Freedom of Information Act, they have pried thousands of pages of previously secret documents from the Defense Department and other agencies.&quot;&gt;Torture begins at the top&lt;/a&gt;, Joe Conason suggests that a recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &quot;marching orders&quot; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from Defense Secretary Rumsfeld himself and all the while &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5083701-110481,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Fresh allegations about a regime of torture and humiliation inflicted on detainees by their American captors at Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay have been made by a Briton still held there, according to Foreign Office documents seen by the Guardian. The claims by Martin Mubanga, from London, are the latest to surface from the prison where the US holds 550 Muslim men it claims are terrorists in conditions that have sparked worldwide condemnation. &quot;&gt;Guant&amp;#0225;namo torture and humiliation still going on, says shackled Briton&lt;/a&gt;. (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38012</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:53:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>AlbertoGonzales</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>ExecutiveOrder</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>FreedomOfInformationAct</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>Interrogation</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Torture</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Khaki and Camo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26163/Khaki%2Dand%2DCamo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/03/opinion/03KRUG.html"&gt;Paul Krugman&lt;/a&gt; writes that the Bush administration will fight a &quot;khaki election&quot; next year, taking advantage of the general good feeling after the Iraq war. The original khaki election was the British election of 1900, contested during the Boer War. Our armed forces don&apos;t really wear khaki so much anymore and I think we need a new term. I suggest calling 2004 the &quot;Camo Election.&quot; Any better suggestions?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26163</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2003 10:15:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Election2004</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>khaki</category>
		<category>KhakiElection</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>PaulKrugman</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>Mekon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Jury Duty is something many of us face.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23963/Jury%2DDuty%2Dis%2Dsomething%2Dmany%2Dof%2Dus%2Dface</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/01/nyregion/01COUR.html?tntemail1"&gt;We all must do our civic duty.&lt;/a&gt; But how many of us can fill in President of the United States on the questionnaire when it asks for former jobs held? A bit of mirth for today. NY Times req. required.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23963</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2003 07:47:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BillClinton</category>
		<category>court</category>
		<category>jury</category>
		<category>JuryDuty</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>VoirDire</category>
		<category>WilliamJeffersonClinton</category>
		<dc:creator>Plunge</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A much more medicated Camelot</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21725/A%2Dmuch%2Dmore%2Dmedicated%2DCamelot</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/17/politics/17JFK.html"&gt;Inside the JFK medical files.&lt;/a&gt; Very interesting article from Sunday&apos;s NY Times (reg. req&apos;d) about the long-term health of John F. Kennedy, from World War II to his death.  Corresponding Yahoo News item &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/nm/20021117/ts_nm/life_kennedy_illnesses_dc_5&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; also. [more inside...]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21725</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:26:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AddisonsDisease</category>
		<category>AnUnfinishedLife</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>fitness</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>hormones</category>
		<category>JFK</category>
		<category>LifeIsUnfair</category>
		<category>MedicalRecords</category>
		<category>medication</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYT</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>pain</category>
		<category>RobertDallek</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>PeteyStock</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14679/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/11/politics/11LIBR.html?todaysheadlines"&gt;The Battle Over Bush&apos;s Gov. Papers.&lt;/a&gt; What are they hiding?  Executive order blocking Presidential papers, refusing to turn over Energy Taskforce member list, and now this!  There must be something to hide.  But what?!?!?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14679</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:42:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>Governor</category>
		<category>GubernatorialPapers</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>papers</category>
		<category>Texas</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>bas67</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5905/</link>
		<description> yesterday the times printed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/18/opinion/18CLIN.html&quot;&gt;an op-ed by clinton&lt;/a&gt; in which he made a case for his controversial pardons.  [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/5890&quot;&gt;mefi partisans went at it&lt;/a&gt;] -- today the times editorial &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/19/opinion/19MON1.html&quot; title=&quot;mr. clinton&apos;s explanation&quot;&gt;attacks that very piece&lt;/a&gt; AND prints &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/19/opinion/19SAFI.html&quot; title=&quot;lay off our bill&quot;&gt;a safire op-ed&lt;/a&gt; attacking it as well.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5905</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:14:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BillClinton</category>
		<category>editorial</category>
		<category>MarcRich</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>OpEd</category>
		<category>pardon</category>
		<category>pardons</category>
		<category>PincusGreen</category>
		<category>PresidentialPardons</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>WilliamSafire</category>
		<dc:creator>palegirl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


