<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with NYTimes and science</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/NYTimes+science</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'NYTimes' and 'science' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 05:15:18 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 05:15:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>2005 - The Year in Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47492/2005%2DThe%2DYear%2Din%2DIdeas</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/11/magazine/11ideas1-1.html"&gt;2005 - The Year in Ideas.&lt;/a&gt; From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/11/magazine/11ideas1-2.html&quot;&gt;Accredited Bliss&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/11/magazine/11ideas_section4-21.html&quot;&gt;Zombie Dogs&lt;/a&gt;, the NY Times runs through the year&apos;s scientific, cultural, and academic developments.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47492</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 05:15:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2005</category>
		<category>developments</category>
		<category>ideas</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>zombies</category>
		<dc:creator>ph00dz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Science</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36227/Science</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/10/magazine/10GENETIC.html?ex=1098430289&amp;ei=1&amp;en=87d803d7c93982c7&quot;&gt;In terms of our genes&lt;/a&gt;, we humans are all the same -- except
for the ways in which we&apos;re different. Pharmacogenomics has for years been touted as the ultimate benefit of the genomics revolution. But to many, this revolution has a troubling side.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36227</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:55:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>genes</category>
		<category>genetics</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>medications</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>pharmacogenomics</category>
		<category>pharmacology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Science Times: 25th Anniversary</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29528/Science%2DTimes%2D25th%2DAnniversary</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/pages/science/index.html"&gt;Science Times: 25th Anniversary&lt;/a&gt; The first issue of Science Times[weekly section of &lt;i&gt;N.Y. Times&lt;/i&gt;] appeared 25 years ago, on Nov. 14, 1978. Its guiding principle ever since has been that science is not a collection of answers, but a way of asking questions, an enterprise driven by curiosity. To celebrate the anniversary, we pose 25 of the most provocative questions facing science. As always, answers are provisional. [free reg req&apos;d]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29528</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2003 17:09:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anniversary</category>
		<category>answers</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>questions</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sciencetimes</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>so what&apos;s in that 0.1%?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26202/so%2Dwhats%2Din%2Dthat%2D01</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/03/national/03DNA.html"&gt;DNA used to ascertain race of unidentified serial killer.&lt;/a&gt; Florida company DNAPrint Genomics claims their test can identify the race (ie, African, Caucasian, East Asian or American Indian) of a person from their DNA.  CEO Tony Frudakis &lt;a href=http://www.dnaprint.com/pr_5_2_03.htm&gt;says&lt;/a&gt; that &quot;of over 2,200 blind samples tested, the test is yet to get one wrong.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26202</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2003 00:30:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bioscience</category>
		<category>DNA</category>
		<category>genome</category>
		<category>genomics</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>shoos</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>environmental spin memo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24039/environmental%2Dspin%2Dmemo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/02/politics/02ENVI.html"&gt;Spinning the Environment&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt; One section of the memorandum, &quot;Winning the Global Warming Debate,&quot; asserts that many voters believe there is a lack of consensus about global warming among scientists. &quot;Should the public come to believe that the scientific issues are settled, their views about global warming will change accordingly,&quot; it says. &quot;Therefore you need to continue to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue.&quot;

Among the ways to &quot;challenge the science,&quot; the memorandum says, is to &quot;be even more active in recruiting experts who are sympathetic to your view and much more active in making them part of your message&quot; because &quot;people are more willing to trust scientists than politicians.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

So much for science based decisions regarding the fouling of our nest.  Sounds Green = Is Green in the bizarro world of spin.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24039</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 09:06:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ClimateChange</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>GlobalWarming</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Missile Defense and Theodore Postol</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22634/Missile%2DDefense%2Dand%2DTheodore%2DPostol</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/02/national/02MISS.html"&gt;It&apos;s about Time&lt;/a&gt; this guy was recognized with accolades as the premiere whistleblower in the US.   Just think of all the tax money that could be saved if everyone learned what Postol already knows!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; 

Is NMD more theology than science?   It would appear so.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22634</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2003 06:44:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fraud</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>MilitarySpending</category>
		<category>MissileDefense</category>
		<category>MIT</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>TheodorePostol</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14594/</link>
		<description> Scientists in the USA have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/08/health/08CLOC.html&quot;&gt;discovered&lt;/a&gt; [NYTimes] a new cell in the eye responsible for resetting the biological clock. Its being called &quot;heretical&quot;.. &lt;i&gt;Not every day, Dr. Provencio said, do scientists find a new body function.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14594</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 05:54:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>cells</category>
		<category>CircadianRhythm</category>
		<category>eye</category>
		<category>eyes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7383/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/02/national/02LAB.html"&gt;question your science professional&lt;/a&gt; MD, PhD, specialist. I&apos;ve always thought you should seriously question their input on all their advise but most ppl don&apos;t.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7383</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2001 22:50:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>experts</category>
		<category>forensics</category>
		<category>JoyceGilchrist</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>greyscale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


