<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with NetworkSolutions</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/NetworkSolutions</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'NetworkSolutions' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:09:41 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:09:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16299/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.textism.com/article/494/"&gt;Hoopla.com Stolen, Net Sol says, &quot;Oops! Not Our Problem!&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Leslie Harpold&apos;s Hoopla.com was stolen from her through a series of dodgy faxes (or something...) and now, Network Solutions is throwing up their hands and telling her they can&apos;t do anything.  If this doesn&apos;t beg for Metafilter community action, I don&apos;t know what does.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16299</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:09:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domain</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>hoopla</category>
		<category>NetworkSolutions</category>
		<category>NIC</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<category>registry</category>
		<category>textism</category>
		<dc:creator>benbrown</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15990/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nsihorrorstories.com"&gt;While you might want to think so&lt;/a&gt; none of the stories on this site are jokes.  Ever since &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networksolutions.com&quot;&gt;Network Solutions&lt;/a&gt; was assimilated by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verisign.com&quot;&gt;Verisign&lt;/a&gt; (&quot;Trust is the foundation of every human relationship&quot;), their tactics to obtain (or retain) your business have gotten sneakier.  Be warned, non-Verisign domain registrants, you may get an invoice from Verisign that looks like &lt;a href=&quot;http://nsihorrorstories.com/images/front.gif&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.  Ethical?  Hardly.  Try as I might, I can&apos;t find anyone trying to stop Verisign from these practices.  I&apos;m beginning to think Verisign is really &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verizon.com&quot;&gt;run by these folks&lt;/a&gt;.

By the way, this is my first post.  Please be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.superstarbunny.com&quot;&gt;gentle&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15990</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2002 13:53:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>DomainRegistry</category>
		<category>NetworkSolutions</category>
		<category>NSI</category>
		<category>Registrar</category>
		<category>Verisign</category>
		<dc:creator>WolfDaddy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8639/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zeldman.com/coming.html"&gt;Zeldman&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; seemingly constant problems with Network Solutions continue. It raises two questions for me. 1. Why wouldn&apos;t he change the domain and/or name rather cease publication of one of the best independant publications on the web? and 2. How come they haven&apos;t overhauled the domain registration system to have other methods for verification? At the company where I work we have over 50 domains and we&apos;re constantly having problems with peoples&apos; names who are long since gone being on the registration and not being able to remove them. Hope it works out for him, I couldn&apos;t live without my ALA fix.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8639</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:01:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dns</category>
		<category>domain</category>
		<category>networksolutions</category>
		<dc:creator>abosio</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5854/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dotcom.com/services/index.html"&gt;Network Solutions sells out.&lt;/a&gt; The once-monopoly has decided to pool all their domain name registration information and sell it to the spammers of the world. From their marketing website, &quot;Taking advantage of our position as a market leader, we have organized our pool of over 15 million registered domain names into a customer database of over 5 million unique customers. Our data service offers access to the key decision-makers behind millions of leading Web businesses.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

True, there is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/legal/privacy-policy.html&quot;&gt;privacy policy&lt;/a&gt;, and you can try and protect yourself following their instructions, but it would seem that once the cat&apos;s out of the bag... And, what&apos;s to keep someone from purchasing the database of email addresses, fax numbers, telephone numbers, and addresses and selling them off to someone else?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5854</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:12:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>database</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>NetworkSolutions</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>sellout</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>spammers</category>
		<dc:creator>warhol</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5602/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.networksolutions.com"&gt;Feeling Safe about the Keeper of Domain Names&lt;/a&gt; Anyone notice that at least at 10:30am EST that Network Solutions homepage brings up an Error page?  Doesn&apos;t that make us all feel safe.

And then there was the Registrars.com registrar transfer form which didn&apos;t think the domain I was trying to transfer had been registered (but if you used their WHOIS it showed it was).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5602</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:39:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>icann</category>
		<category>networksolutions</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<category>whois</category>
		<dc:creator>matte</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3820/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2000/1020hoard.html"&gt;Network Solutions faces &apos;hoarding&apos; allegations.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Networks Solutions Inc. has illegally restrained trade and willfully maintained monopoly power over expired domain names, according to a class-action lawsuit recently filed by an Alabama businessman.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3820</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:16:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>monopolies</category>
		<category>networksolutions</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<dc:creator>Zool</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2772/</link>
		<description> Read the letter to Jeff Bezos &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/rickvonsloneker/amazon.txt&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Amazon.com.org&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2772</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 08:25:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Amazon</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>domain</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>JeffBezos</category>
		<category>joke</category>
		<category>NetworkSolutions</category>
		<category>spoof</category>
		<dc:creator>DragonBoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1880/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.icann.org/at-large/self-nomination.htm"&gt;Anyone else joined up for this?&lt;/a&gt; With all the grief that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icann.org/&quot;&gt;ICANN&lt;/a&gt; &amp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networksolutions.com&quot;&gt;NSI&lt;/a&gt; seem to be causing these days, I&apos;m curious how many other people out there have joined the ICANN Member-At-Large program, and if anyone has posted any comments yet.  To me, requiring someone to get 10% of the Asian region, to be self-nominated, seems most improbable.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1880</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2000 13:39:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>member-at-large</category>
		<category>NetworkSolutions</category>
		<category>NSI</category>
		<dc:creator>nomisxid</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1342/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/000414-000021.html"&gt;NSI: &quot;We weren&apos;t hacked, we were just stupid.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Ah, I feel reassured.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1342</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:40:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>networksolutions</category>
		<category>serbia</category>
		<category>stupid</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1322/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://greenspun.com/ct/baylink/META-NSI?send_to=http://www.upside.com/News/38f4d30b0.html"&gt;I don&apos;t believe it...&lt;/a&gt; I actually agree with something Network Solutions has done.  They&apos;ve apparently changed their policy to make domain name squatting more difficult.  The story sounds sympathetic to the two ladies in question, but I&apos;m not.  Ok, maybe they should have been a touch more careful in how they *rolled out* the new policy, but the policy itself is about 5 years overdue.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Now, if we could just get them to *do what we tell them to*...
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Cheers,&lt;br&gt;
-- &lt;a href=&quot;http://greenspun.com/ct/baylink/FROM-METANSI?send_to=http://baylink.pitas.com&quot;&gt;jra&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1322</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:00:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cybersquatting</category>
		<category>DomainNames</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>NetSol</category>
		<category>NetworkSolutions</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82/</link>
		<description> I&apos;ve always wondered why no one has made a search engine that indexes URL&apos;s and nothing more. Network Solutions has just released &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.dotcomdirectory.com/nsi/basic.hm&apos;&gt;their dot com search engine&lt;/a&gt;, but unfortunately a few test searches came up with some pretty dismal results.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.82</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1999 22:51:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>networksolutions</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


