<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with NewYorkTimes and iraq</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/NewYorkTimes+iraq</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'NewYorkTimes' and 'iraq' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:26:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:26:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>On Policy Discussions in a Never-Ending War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47744/On%2DPolicy%2DDiscussions%2Din%2Da%2DNeverEnding%2DWar</link>
		<description> &quot;&lt;a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10536559/site/newsweek/&gt;I learned this week&lt;/a&gt; that on December 6, Bush summoned Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger and executive editor Bill Keller to the Oval Office in a futile attempt to talk them out of running &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.html?hp&amp;ex=1134795600&amp;en=c7596fe0d4798785&amp;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage&quot;&gt;the story&lt;/a&gt;...&quot; President Bush &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; did not want journalists to reveal his NSA spying program against Americans [discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/47642&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]  And in yesterday&apos;s rare &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2005/12/20/america/web.2012.conferencetext.php&quot;&gt;press conference&lt;/a&gt;, the President said: &quot;An open debate about law would say to the enemy, &apos;Here&apos;s what we&apos;re going to do.&apos; And this is an enemy which adjusts... Any public hearings on programs will say to the enemy, &apos;Here&apos;s what they do. Adjust.&apos; This is a war.&quot; Neocon guru William Kristol &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/19/AR2005121901027.html&quot;&gt;argues&lt;/a&gt; that talk of Bush being an &quot;imperial&quot; president&quot; is &quot;demagogic&quot; and &quot;irresponsible&quot; since &quot;Congress has the right and the ability to judge whether President Bush has in fact used his executive discretion soundly.&quot;  What is the role of &quot;open debate&quot; in a war against terror that may last for decades?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47744</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlQaeda</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Kristol</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>Times</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>hahah!! history repeats itself.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39182/hahah%2Dhistory%2Drepeats%2Ditself</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_01/005556.php"&gt;United States officials were surprised and heartened today at the size of turnout in [insert country]&apos;s presidential election despite a [insert terror group] terrorist campaign to disrupt the voting.&lt;/a&gt; According to reports from [insert besieged capital city], 83 per cent of the 5.85 million registered voters cast their ballots yesterday. Many of them risked reprisals threatened by the [insert terror group].&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
....A successful election has long been seen as the keystone in President [insert idiotic Texas Republican]&apos;s policy of encouraging the growth of constitutional processes in [insert besieged country]. The election was the culmination of a constitutional development that began in [insert date], to which President [insert idiotic Texas Republican] gave his personal commitment when he met [foreign puppet politician], the chief of state, in Honolulu in February.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Dateline?  Sept. 4th, 1967.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Fact-Checked with archived NYT links at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/1/31/2335/87390&quot;&gt;Daily KOS&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39182</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:49:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dailykos</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>vietnam</category>
		<dc:creator>taumeson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An Executive Order Along Torture&apos;s Path</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38012/An%2DExecutive%2DOrder%2DAlong%2DTortures%2DPath</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf&quot; title=&quot;&apos;&apos;I have been told that all interrogation techniques previously authorized by the Executive Order are still on the table but that certain techniques can only be used if very high-level authority is granted.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Request for guidance regarding the OGC&apos;s EC regarding detainee abuse, referring to &#8220;interrogation techniques made lawful&#8221; by the &#8220;President&apos;s Executive Order.&#8221;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; comes  from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/&quot;&gt;Records Released in Response to Torture FOIA Request&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/news/NewsPrint.cfm?ID=17216&amp;c=206&quot; title=&quot;The two-page e-mail that references an Executive Order states that the President directly authorized interrogation techniques including sleep deprivation, stress positions, the use of military dogs, and &apos;&apos;sensory deprivation through the use of hoods, etc.&apos;&apos; The ACLU is urging the White House to confirm or deny the existence of such an order and immediately to release the order if it exists. The FBI e-mail, which was sent in May 2004 from &apos;&apos;On Scene Commander--Baghdad&apos;&apos; to a handful of senior FBI officials, notes that the FBI has prohibited its agents from employing the techniques that the President is said to have authorized. &quot;&gt;Smoking Gun ?&lt;/a&gt; asks the ACLU--or just another stepping stone from &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6733558/site/newsweek/print/1/displaymode/1098/&quot; title=&quot;In a Jan. 25, 2002, memo to Bush, Gonzales said the new war on terror &apos;&apos;renders obsolete Geneva&apos;s strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners.&apos;&apos; Some State Department lawyers charge that Gonzales misrepresented so many legal considerations and facts (including hard conclusions by State&apos;s Southeast Asia bureau about the nature of the Taliban) that one lawyer considers the memo to be &apos;&apos;an ethical breach.&apos;&apos; In response, a senior White House official says Gonzales&apos;s memo was only a &apos;&apos;draft&apos;&apos; and just one part of an extensive decision-making process in which all views were aired.&quot;&gt;Torture&apos;s Path&lt;/a&gt; ? As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/16/politics/16jag.html?ei=5090&amp;en=5016ee06544b6bc4&amp;ex=1260939600&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot; title=&quot;Several former high-ranking military lawyers say they are discussing ways to oppose President Bush&apos;s nomination of Alberto Gonzales to be attorney general, asserting that Gonzales&apos;s supervision of legal memorandums that appeared to sanction harsh treatment of detainees, even torture, showed unsound legal judgment.&quot;&gt;Ex-Military Lawyers Object to Bush Cabinet Nominee&lt;/a&gt;, and in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2004/12/17/memo/print.html&quot; title=&quot;Renewed exposure of prisoner abuse, torture and even murder by American military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan is widening already deep divisions between the Pentagon and the intelligence community -- and creating an untenable situation for Donald Rumsfeld, the beleaguered secretary of defense. A recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &apos;&apos;marching orders&apos;&apos; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from the defense secretary himself. In recent days, a coalition of human rights groups led by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights has brought new cases of abuse to public attention. Using the Freedom of Information Act, they have pried thousands of pages of previously secret documents from the Defense Department and other agencies.&quot;&gt;Torture begins at the top&lt;/a&gt;, Joe Conason suggests that a recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &quot;marching orders&quot; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from Defense Secretary Rumsfeld himself and all the while &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5083701-110481,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Fresh allegations about a regime of torture and humiliation inflicted on detainees by their American captors at Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay have been made by a Briton still held there, according to Foreign Office documents seen by the Guardian. The claims by Martin Mubanga, from London, are the latest to surface from the prison where the US holds 550 Muslim men it claims are terrorists in conditions that have sparked worldwide condemnation. &quot;&gt;Guant&amp;#0225;namo torture and humiliation still going on, says shackled Briton&lt;/a&gt;. (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38012</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:53:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>AlbertoGonzales</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>ExecutiveOrder</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>FreedomOfInformationAct</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>Interrogation</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Torture</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>State Dept. Study Foresaw Trouble Now Plaguing Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29061/State%2DDept%2DStudy%2DForesaw%2DTrouble%2DNow%2DPlaguing%2DIraq</link>
		<description> Beginning in April 2002, the State Department project assembled more than 200 Iraqi lawyers, engineers, business people and other experts... to study topics ranging from creating a new justice system to reorganizing the military to revamping the economy. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/19/international/worldspecial/19POST.html?ei=5062&amp;en=68b5f9f75d404f05&amp;ex=1067140800&amp;partner=GOOGLE&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot; title=&quot;The year-long study accurately forecast many of the problems besetting US-led forces. It said that, far from hailing the American troops as liberators, Iraqi society had been so brutalised by the former regime that the people would react coolly to US attempts to build democracy. &quot;&gt;Their findings&lt;/a&gt; included a much more dire assessment of Iraq&apos;s dilapidated electrical and water systems... warned... many Iraqis might react coolly to Americans&apos; notion of quickly rebuilding civil society. Several officials said that many of the findings in the $5 million study were ignored by Pentagon officials until recently... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4778043-103550,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Among other forecast outcomes was the risk associated with quickly disbanding the Iraqi army, which the US promptly did. The report said that jobs would need to be found for the decommissioned troops to prevent them turning against coalition troops. Many of the attacks on US soldiers are believed to have been carried out by former members of the Iraqi army.&quot;&gt;The work&lt;/a&gt; is now being relied on heavily as occupation forces struggle to impose stability in Iraq.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29061</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:33:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>statedepartment</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How bad is it really in Iraq?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28616/How%2Dbad%2Dis%2Dit%2Dreally%2Din%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20030923/5523696s.htm"&gt;How bad is it really in Iraq?&lt;/a&gt; The majority of the media stories have covered the attacks on American troops and the unrest among Iraqi citizens. But is that the full story? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cathnews.com/news/309/154.php&quot;&gt;An Iraqi Catholic bishop thinks the media is lying about the postwar state of the country.&lt;/a&gt; An Iraqi journalist writes that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iraq-today.com/news/religion/00007.html&quot;&gt;Basrah is moving towards religious stability&lt;/a&gt;. There are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20030925/5532524s.htm&quot;&gt;other stories of the renewed economic opportunities in Iraq&lt;/a&gt;. An American federal judge visited the country and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/6307.htm&quot;&gt;found overwhelming support for Americans&lt;/a&gt;. Even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,98200,00.html&quot;&gt;a Democratic Congressman thinks the negative media coverage is dangerous&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcentralstation.com/092303E.html&quot;&gt;More coverage from in-country&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/24/international/middleeast/24BAGH.html&quot;&gt;polls (NY Times)&lt;/a&gt; that show Iraqi optimism&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28616</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:03:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<dc:creator>marcusb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Osama, wild and free, is pleased...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27808/Osama%2Dwild%2Dand%2Dfree%2Dis%2Dpleased</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/20/opinion/20STER.html?pagewanted=print&amp;amp;position="&gt;Terrorist playground: How America created a terrorist haven in Iraq&lt;/a&gt; Jessica Stern, a lecturer at Harvard University&apos;s Kennedy School of Government and author of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/08/19/earlyshow/leisure/books/printable569179.shtml&quot;&gt;&quot;Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill&quot;&lt;/a&gt; argues, in a New York Times op ed piece, that U.S. negligence has allowed Iraq to metastasize into a terrorist training camp to which Islamic militants from all over the Middle East are now flocking for a chance to attack American troops,  and in which the Iraq/Al-Qaeda links alleged by the Bush Administration are becoming a reality.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onpointradio.org/shows/2003/08/20030822_a_main.asp&quot;&gt;Listen to Jessica Stern on &quot;On Point&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  tonight (a WBUR production and will be archived if you miss it).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27808</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:27:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>harvard</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>oped</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Top 10 ways to cope with power outages</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27678/Top%2D10%2Dways%2Dto%2Dcope%2Dwith%2Dpower%2Doutages</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Blackout-Iraqs-Top-10.html"&gt;Top 10 ways to cope with power outages&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;From the Iraqis, who&apos;ve had plenty of exeprience with this recently. (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/weblog&quot;&gt;Tapped&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27678</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2003 09:49:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>electricity</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Khaki and Camo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26163/Khaki%2Dand%2DCamo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/03/opinion/03KRUG.html"&gt;Paul Krugman&lt;/a&gt; writes that the Bush administration will fight a &quot;khaki election&quot; next year, taking advantage of the general good feeling after the Iraq war. The original khaki election was the British election of 1900, contested during the Boer War. Our armed forces don&apos;t really wear khaki so much anymore and I think we need a new term. I suggest calling 2004 the &quot;Camo Election.&quot; Any better suggestions?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26163</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2003 10:15:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Election2004</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>khaki</category>
		<category>KhakiElection</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>PaulKrugman</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>Mekon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


