<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with NewYorkTimes and security</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/NewYorkTimes+security</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'NewYorkTimes' and 'security' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 20:13:36 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 20:13:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20060/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/16/business/media/16EPIC.html"&gt;Preventing Piracy With Krazy Glue.&lt;/a&gt; (NY Times) Man...what will they think of next?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20060</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 20:13:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>krazyglue</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>stew560</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14856/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/17/politics/17SECR.html?todaysheadlines"&gt;U.S. Tightening Rules on Keeping Scientific Secrets [NYTimes free subscription required]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;One White House proposal is to eliminate the sections of articles that give experimental details researchers from other laboratories would need to replicate the claimed results, helping to prove their validity &quot;&lt;/i&gt;  It&apos;s a new monkey to keep See, Hear, and Speak no evil company: Publish no scientifically replicable evil.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14856</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2002 07:39:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>secrecy</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>StateSecrets</category>
		<category>TomRidge</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>srboisvert</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11944/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011030/ts/bush_world_series_1.html"&gt;Bush will observe &quot;high alert&quot; at...the World Series?&lt;/a&gt; Confirmed at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/national/news-attack-bush-baseball.html&quot;&gt;NY Times&lt;/a&gt;.  Is this sort of mixed signal supposed to make us feel better about our safety?  At least &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011030/ts/attacks_investigation_48.html&quot;&gt;officials disclosed that Vice President Dick Cheney [has] been taken to an undisclosed secure location&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  Let&apos;s review: we&apos;re on high alert; the President is going to a sporting event; the Vice-President is safe.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cx/uc/20011025/tt/?u&quot;&gt;Tom Toles got it right.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11944</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:49:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>baseball</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>theworldseries</category>
		<dc:creator>precipice</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3691/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://channel.nytimes.com/partners/anjan/anjan.history"&gt;NYTimes.com has low security&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Even me, the casual passerby, could access secret documents about the mysterious &quot;partners,&quot; while trying to avoid downloading a cookie. Heh, &quot;channel&quot;, &quot;partners&quot;, the number 10. They&apos;re all related somehow?

PS: &quot;channel.nytimes.com&quot; doesn&apos;t give access to pages without logging in. Any ideas?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3691</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:17:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cookies</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


