<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with NewYorkTimes and war</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/NewYorkTimes+war</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'NewYorkTimes' and 'war' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:09:27 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:09:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>An Iwo Jima Relic Binds Generations</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85171/An%2DIwo%2DJima%2DRelic%2DBinds%2DGenerations</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/nyregion/20iwo.html?hp=&amp;amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;An Iwo Jima Relic Binds Generations.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(SLNYTTJ - single-link new york times tear-jerker.)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85171</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:09:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>iwojima</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>nyt</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<category>reconciliation</category>
		<category>tearjerker</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>alms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How to screw up a war story</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/77967/How%2Dto%2Dscrew%2Dup%2Da%2Dwar%2Dstory</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;What was so shameful and embarrassing to me, an American journalist whose own Moscow-based newspaper, The eXile, had just been &lt;a href=&quot;http://exiledonline.com/the-exiled-were-back-and-were-very-pissed-off/&quot;&gt;driven out&lt;/a&gt; of existence &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/73320/Exiled&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt; by these same Kremlin bastards, is that Sasha was rightly frustrated. A Kremlin minder right and the Western journalists wrong? What has this world come to when the Kremlin has a better grasp of the truth than the free Western media?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://exiledonline.com/how-to-screw-up-a-war-story-the-new-york-times-at-work/all/1/&quot;&gt;How to screw up a war story: The New York Times at work&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.77967</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:04:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>exiledonline</category>
		<category>georgia</category>
		<category>markames</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>russia</category>
		<category>theexile</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Anything</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Capa Cache</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68559/The%2DCapa%2DCache</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/arts/design/27kenn.html"&gt;The Mexican Suitcase&lt;/a&gt; The rediscovery of &quot;The Mexican Suitcase,&quot; and what untold mysteries it may reveal!  Once considered lost forever, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/arts/design/27kenn.html&quot;&gt;huge cache&lt;/a&gt; of pristine negatives taken by Robert Capa has been rediscovered in Mexico City.  The film could reveal the truth behind his most famous image, Fallen Soldier, which may have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/database/capa_r.html&quot;&gt;been staged&lt;/a&gt;.   Previously &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/54503/The-DDay-Photographs-of-Robert-Capa&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/25/which-came-first-the-chicken-or-the-egg-part-one/?scp=2-b&amp;sq=crimean+war&amp;st=nyt&quot;&gt;Similarly...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68559</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:14:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>discovery</category>
		<category>firstpost</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>mexicansuitcase</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>photojournalism</category>
		<category>robertcapa</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>wowbobwow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>On Policy Discussions in a Never-Ending War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47744/On%2DPolicy%2DDiscussions%2Din%2Da%2DNeverEnding%2DWar</link>
		<description> &quot;&lt;a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10536559/site/newsweek/&gt;I learned this week&lt;/a&gt; that on December 6, Bush summoned Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger and executive editor Bill Keller to the Oval Office in a futile attempt to talk them out of running &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.html?hp&amp;ex=1134795600&amp;en=c7596fe0d4798785&amp;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage&quot;&gt;the story&lt;/a&gt;...&quot; President Bush &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; did not want journalists to reveal his NSA spying program against Americans [discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/47642&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]  And in yesterday&apos;s rare &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2005/12/20/america/web.2012.conferencetext.php&quot;&gt;press conference&lt;/a&gt;, the President said: &quot;An open debate about law would say to the enemy, &apos;Here&apos;s what we&apos;re going to do.&apos; And this is an enemy which adjusts... Any public hearings on programs will say to the enemy, &apos;Here&apos;s what they do. Adjust.&apos; This is a war.&quot; Neocon guru William Kristol &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/19/AR2005121901027.html&quot;&gt;argues&lt;/a&gt; that talk of Bush being an &quot;imperial&quot; president&quot; is &quot;demagogic&quot; and &quot;irresponsible&quot; since &quot;Congress has the right and the ability to judge whether President Bush has in fact used his executive discretion soundly.&quot;  What is the role of &quot;open debate&quot; in a war against terror that may last for decades?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47744</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlQaeda</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Kristol</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>Times</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An Executive Order Along Torture&apos;s Path</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38012/An%2DExecutive%2DOrder%2DAlong%2DTortures%2DPath</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf&quot; title=&quot;&apos;&apos;I have been told that all interrogation techniques previously authorized by the Executive Order are still on the table but that certain techniques can only be used if very high-level authority is granted.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Request for guidance regarding the OGC&apos;s EC regarding detainee abuse, referring to &#8220;interrogation techniques made lawful&#8221; by the &#8220;President&apos;s Executive Order.&#8221;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; comes  from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/&quot;&gt;Records Released in Response to Torture FOIA Request&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/news/NewsPrint.cfm?ID=17216&amp;c=206&quot; title=&quot;The two-page e-mail that references an Executive Order states that the President directly authorized interrogation techniques including sleep deprivation, stress positions, the use of military dogs, and &apos;&apos;sensory deprivation through the use of hoods, etc.&apos;&apos; The ACLU is urging the White House to confirm or deny the existence of such an order and immediately to release the order if it exists. The FBI e-mail, which was sent in May 2004 from &apos;&apos;On Scene Commander--Baghdad&apos;&apos; to a handful of senior FBI officials, notes that the FBI has prohibited its agents from employing the techniques that the President is said to have authorized. &quot;&gt;Smoking Gun ?&lt;/a&gt; asks the ACLU--or just another stepping stone from &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6733558/site/newsweek/print/1/displaymode/1098/&quot; title=&quot;In a Jan. 25, 2002, memo to Bush, Gonzales said the new war on terror &apos;&apos;renders obsolete Geneva&apos;s strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners.&apos;&apos; Some State Department lawyers charge that Gonzales misrepresented so many legal considerations and facts (including hard conclusions by State&apos;s Southeast Asia bureau about the nature of the Taliban) that one lawyer considers the memo to be &apos;&apos;an ethical breach.&apos;&apos; In response, a senior White House official says Gonzales&apos;s memo was only a &apos;&apos;draft&apos;&apos; and just one part of an extensive decision-making process in which all views were aired.&quot;&gt;Torture&apos;s Path&lt;/a&gt; ? As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/16/politics/16jag.html?ei=5090&amp;en=5016ee06544b6bc4&amp;ex=1260939600&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot; title=&quot;Several former high-ranking military lawyers say they are discussing ways to oppose President Bush&apos;s nomination of Alberto Gonzales to be attorney general, asserting that Gonzales&apos;s supervision of legal memorandums that appeared to sanction harsh treatment of detainees, even torture, showed unsound legal judgment.&quot;&gt;Ex-Military Lawyers Object to Bush Cabinet Nominee&lt;/a&gt;, and in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2004/12/17/memo/print.html&quot; title=&quot;Renewed exposure of prisoner abuse, torture and even murder by American military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan is widening already deep divisions between the Pentagon and the intelligence community -- and creating an untenable situation for Donald Rumsfeld, the beleaguered secretary of defense. A recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &apos;&apos;marching orders&apos;&apos; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from the defense secretary himself. In recent days, a coalition of human rights groups led by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights has brought new cases of abuse to public attention. Using the Freedom of Information Act, they have pried thousands of pages of previously secret documents from the Defense Department and other agencies.&quot;&gt;Torture begins at the top&lt;/a&gt;, Joe Conason suggests that a recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &quot;marching orders&quot; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from Defense Secretary Rumsfeld himself and all the while &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5083701-110481,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Fresh allegations about a regime of torture and humiliation inflicted on detainees by their American captors at Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay have been made by a Briton still held there, according to Foreign Office documents seen by the Guardian. The claims by Martin Mubanga, from London, are the latest to surface from the prison where the US holds 550 Muslim men it claims are terrorists in conditions that have sparked worldwide condemnation. &quot;&gt;Guant&amp;#0225;namo torture and humiliation still going on, says shackled Briton&lt;/a&gt;. (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38012</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:53:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>AlbertoGonzales</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>ExecutiveOrder</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>FreedomOfInformationAct</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>Interrogation</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Torture</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Khaki and Camo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26163/Khaki%2Dand%2DCamo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/03/opinion/03KRUG.html"&gt;Paul Krugman&lt;/a&gt; writes that the Bush administration will fight a &quot;khaki election&quot; next year, taking advantage of the general good feeling after the Iraq war. The original khaki election was the British election of 1900, contested during the Boer War. Our armed forces don&apos;t really wear khaki so much anymore and I think we need a new term. I suggest calling 2004 the &quot;Camo Election.&quot; Any better suggestions?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26163</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2003 10:15:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Election2004</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>khaki</category>
		<category>KhakiElection</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>PaulKrugman</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>Mekon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17694/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/10/technology/10BLOG.html"&gt;&quot;A Rift Among Bloggers&quot;&lt;/a&gt; is the name of the article in Monday&apos;s &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; on the state of the blogger these days.  A must read if you&apos;ve ever heard the term &quot;warblogger.&quot;  Its a mostly unbiased and refreshingly accurate piece written by David Gallagher of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lightningfield.com/&quot;&gt;LightningField.com&lt;/a&gt; fame.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17694</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2002 23:02:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bloggers</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>davidgallagher</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>nyukid</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12415/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.harpers.org/online/gaza_diary/?pg=1"&gt;Gaza Diary by Chris Hedges&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s generally not the best idea to post links about the Palestine/Israel conflict, as each day&apos;s news can be debated ad infitum by various sides. However this Gaza Diary is a stunning personal look into the ravages of war and occupation. Written by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/pages/world/middleeast/index.html&quot;&gt;New York Times Mideast&lt;/a&gt; Bureau Chief, and published in Harper&apos;s in October, it&apos;s a meditative reflection on the ways the human spirit can be twisted by conflict, and how a reporter (even a seasoned one) responds to the demons of war. Well worth your time.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12415</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2001 12:38:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chrishedges</category>
		<category>gaza</category>
		<category>harpers</category>
		<category>israel</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>palestine</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>cell divide</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7247/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/25/magazine/25KERREY.html"&gt;Sen. Bob Kerrey tells a personal Vietnam horror story&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; And the NYT has posted an advance copy of its Sunday Magazine story to avoid being scooped, which is a first, I believe.&lt;br&gt;
[via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;http://www.nytimes.com&gt;&lt;/a&gt;] Kerrey, as a lieutenant in Vietnam helped kill a village of Vietnamese women and children in 1969. How many more skeletons in the closets of the current leaders of America? And will this spur the actual beginning of American critical reflection on Vietnam, or will it blow over in a few weeks like when MacNamara&apos;s autobiographical confession came out a few years ago?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7247</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:15:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bobkerrey</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>vietnam</category>
		<category>vietnamwar</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


