<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Nonlethal</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Nonlethal</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Nonlethal' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:54:01 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:54:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Don&apos;t say it, spray it</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68253/Dont%2Dsay%2Dit%2Dspray%2Dit</link>
		<description> Did the Victorian police &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/01/16/2139340.htm&quot;&gt;overreact&lt;/a&gt; in spraying capsicum spray into &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neoskosmos.com.au/080117/nkew/community/community_index.shtml&quot;&gt;spectators&lt;/a&gt;  at the Australian open tennis on Tuesday night? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/01/16/2140068.htm?section=sport&quot;&gt;The officers say they were protecting themselves&lt;/a&gt;, it seems &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/what-were-the-police-thinking/2008/01/16/1200419885248.html&quot;&gt;not all agree &lt;/a&gt;and legal action might ensue. Is the Australian  Open &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23060432-2,00.html&quot;&gt;(or any international sporting contest in Australia) &lt;/a&gt;still a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.police.vic.gov.au/content.asp?Document_ID=13821&quot;&gt;family friendly&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://canberra.yourguide.com.au/news/local/general/reputation-gets-a-spray-as-dustups-mar-friendly-slam/1163819.html&quot;&gt;environment&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68253</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:54:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>nonlethal</category>
		<category>pepperspray</category>
		<category>police</category>
		<category>tennis</category>
		<dc:creator>mattoxic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stay out of trouble.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54778/Stay%2Dout%2Dof%2Dtrouble</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/09/12/usaf.weapons.ap/index.html"&gt;One link political newsfilter.&lt;/a&gt; Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne says non-lethal weapons should be tested on US crowds first. Riots dont ensue.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54778</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:58:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>nonlethal</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<category>wynne</category>
		<dc:creator>wilful</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nonlethal weapons</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34494/Nonlethal%2Dweapons</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.aquafoam.com/papers/Bunker.pdf"&gt;Does a mindboggling inventory of nonlethal weapons&lt;/a&gt; (pdf) depress you as further evidence of man&apos;s inhumanity to man? Or does it offer you the welcome relief of knowing there are  enforcement options more palatable than &lt;i&gt;&quot;Time to get mediaeval on yo&apos; ass, mofo&quot;&lt;/i&gt;? (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://jrobb.mindplex.org/2004/07/20.html#a5123&quot;&gt;John Robb&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34494</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 06:03:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Inventory</category>
		<category>Nonlethal</category>
		<category>Weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>RichLyon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11080/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/COMMUNITY/10/03/alexander.cnna/index.html"&gt;The G-Rated War: Blowing Smoke, Pipe Dream, or The Real Hashish?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I want to spin antiwar arguments a slightly different way. Previous threads have been quite dim. This Cnn chat transcript focuses on the use of non-lethal weapons, the need to separate innocents from terrorists and separate terrorist networks from Islamic states, and the interviewee is as much as suit as they come. You could cut a diamond on that crew cut. I have several questions: 1) Is the US military actually going to use non-lethal weapons, or is this the new &quot;smart bomb?&quot; 2) Do the &apos;pacificists&apos; among us consider this to be pacificist? 3) If you do favor peace over war, do you think this is a good compromise between peace and war, or is the issue by definition binary? More &gt; &gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11080</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 19:36:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>nonlethal</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


