<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with OggTheora</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/OggTheora</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'OggTheora' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:19:32 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:19:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The new browser video wars</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/90279/The%2Dnew%2Dbrowser%2Dvideo%2Dwars</link>
		<description> The &lt;a href=&quot;http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#video&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;video tag&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt;, as defined by the HTML5 spec, is an element &quot;used for playing videos or movies&quot;. Which &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codec&quot;&gt;codec&lt;/a&gt; those videos or movies are in is currently undefined, with the two contenders being the free open source &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theora.org/&quot;&gt;Ogg Theora&lt;/a&gt; and the proprietary &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mpegla.com/main/programs/AVC/Pages/Intro.aspx&quot;&gt;H.264&lt;/a&gt;. With the unveiling of &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/03/16/html5-hardware-accelerated-first-ie9-platform-preview-available-for-developers.aspx&quot;&gt;Internet Explorer 9&lt;/a&gt; both Microsoft and Apple are supporting H.264 in their browsers, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://keyj.s2000.ws/?p=356&quot;&gt;comparisons&lt;/a&gt; of the standards seem to bear out H.264 as the better of the two. However Mozilla have taken a stance against incorporating H264 into Firefox on the grounds that it is &lt;a href=&quot;http://shaver.off.net/diary/2010/01/23/html5-video-and-codecs/&quot;&gt;patented and has to be licensed&lt;/a&gt;. Arguments are now being made &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.osnews.com/story/23031/Mozilla_Stick_to_Your_Ideals_Shun_H264&quot;&gt;for&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://briancrescimanno.com/2010/03/17/dear-mozilla-please-dont-kill-html5-video/&quot;&gt;against&lt;/a&gt; Mozilla sticking to its ideals. &lt;a href=&quot;http://daringfireball.net/2010/03/mozilla_video_mobile&quot;&gt;John Gruber&lt;/a&gt; of Daring Fireball points out that Firefox already supports proprietary formats such as GIF. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/node/1772&quot;&gt;Um, perhaps not the best example&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.90279</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:19:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>browsers</category>
		<category>codec</category>
		<category>Firefox</category>
		<category>gif</category>
		<category>H264</category>
		<category>HTML5</category>
		<category>IE9</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>InternetExplorer</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>Mozilla</category>
		<category>OggTheora</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>patents</category>
		<category>proprietary</category>
		<category>proprietry</category>
		<category>Safari</category>
		<category>tags</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<category>W3C</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


