<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with OpenSource and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/OpenSource+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'OpenSource' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 04:43:18 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 04:43:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>MS + SCO + Linux...oh my...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31566/MS%2DSCO%2DLinuxoh%2Dmy</link>
		<description> It comes as no surprise that Microsoft seems to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween10.html&quot;&gt;paying&lt;/a&gt; SCO to fight the fight. &lt;small&gt;[via &lt;a href=&quot;irc://irc.freenode.net/joiito&quot;&gt;#joiito&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31566</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 04:43:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>BSD</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>SCO</category>
		<dc:creator>yonderboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Usability in Open Source</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26459/Usability%2Din%2DOpen%2DSource</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tnl.net/blog/2003/6/13#UsabilityBazaar:Goals"&gt;Usability Bazaar&lt;/a&gt; sounds like a crazy idea: getting together a group of people that will create usability guidelines for open source projects. Do you think that can work? Do OSS projects actually have usability problems? And can this actually work? Generally, usability people don&apos;t seem to get involved in open source. Why? (via webword.com)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26459</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:59:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>usability</category>
		<dc:creator>Adman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A &apos;minifesto&apos; for the constitution of virtual, post-national states</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23898/A%2Dminifesto%2Dfor%2Dthe%2Dconstitution%2Dof%2Dvirtual%2Dpostnational%2Dstates</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://v-2.org/displayArticle.php?article_num=339"&gt;The minimal compact: An open-source constitution for post-national states.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;What sorts of arrangements of power between humans can account for the deep variation in beliefs and assumptions among the six billion of us who share this planet, while still providing for a common jurisprudence? What measures can be taken that enhance the common security without unduly infringing on the sovereignty of the individual?
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I believe that a useful model for the desired structure can be found in the open-source or &quot;free&quot; software movement.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Our own &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/user.mefi/14519&quot;&gt;adamgreenfield&lt;/a&gt; has been thinking about &lt;a href=&quot;http://joi.ito.com/static/emergentdemocracy.html&quot;&gt;emergent democracy&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc082bd.html&quot;&gt;widening gap between power and politics&lt;/a&gt;, and has written a &apos;minifesto,&apos; and would like some feedback. Democracy for the rest of us : fascinating, &apos;deep geek&apos; stuff, and worth your time.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23898</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:13:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AdamGreenfield</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>emergent</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<dc:creator>stavrosthewonderchicken</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14417/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://radioqualia.va.com.au/freeradiolinux/"&gt;Free Radio Linux&lt;/a&gt; is about to go online, reading the entire Linux kernel over the internet using the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/index.html&quot;&gt;Ogg Vorbis&lt;/a&gt; codec.  Free as in beer.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14417</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2002 04:42:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>FreeRadioLinux</category>
		<category>kernel</category>
		<category>Linux</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>OS</category>
		<category>SpokenWord</category>
		<dc:creator>j.edwards</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14345/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/copyleft/copyleftart.jsp"&gt;New Scientist release a copyleft article on......wait for it......copyleft.&lt;/a&gt; In it, they discuss what&apos;s going on in the world of Open Source and how the meme is spreading from software into other areas, like encyclopedias and law.  It concludes saying that open source is currently good for things that don&apos;t need to be confidential and do need to be consistently upgraded/changed.  Does open source have a chance, or is it just a passing fad?  &lt;font size=&quot;-1&quot;&gt;via slashdot&lt;/font&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14345</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:39:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>copyleft</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>NewScientist</category>
		<category>OpenSource</category>
		<dc:creator>taumeson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9710/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.excite.com/news/zd/010829/07/nations-uniting-for"&gt;Software Libre!&lt;/a&gt; Local and national governments around the world are legislating in favor of open source, in a challenge to US corporate (read Microsoft) dominance. A liberating movement, or too much government intrusion?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9710</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2001 06:06:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2463/</link>
		<description> &lt;sarcasm&gt;I am shocked - &lt;b&gt;shocked&lt;/b&gt;, I say!- to discover that the Linux/Open Source media would operate using the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.tucows.com/ext2/00/07/articles/ext207112000.shtml&quot;&gt;same sort of shenanigans&lt;/a&gt; as the media covering the Evil Empire!&lt;/sarcasm&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2463</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2000 07:00:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>OpenSource</category>
		<dc:creator>m.polo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1704/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nupedia.com/"&gt;Nupedia is an open source encyclopedia&lt;/a&gt; that anyone can contribute to, much in the spirit of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dmoz.org/&quot;&gt;DMOZ&lt;/a&gt;, the open directory project. It&apos;s an attempt to combine the world&apos;s experts into one knowledge resource. I guess the question is now...can it work?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1704</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2000 13:36:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>encyclopedia</category>
		<category>Nupedia</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


