<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with POWs</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/POWs</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'POWs' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:55:00 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:55:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>From The Never Ending Story - The Torture Papers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40410/From%2DThe%2DNever%2DEnding%2DStory%2DThe%2DTorture%2DPapers</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;small&gt;While the proverbial road to hell is paved with good intentions, the internal government memos collected in this publication demonstrate that the path to the purgatory that is Guantanamo Bay, or Abu Ghraib, has been paved with decidedly bad intentions. The policies that resulted in rampant abuse of detainees first in Afghanistan, then at Guantanamo Bay, and later in Iraq, were product of three pernicious purposes designed to facilitate the unilateral and unfettered detention, interrogation, abuse, judgment, and punishment of prisoners: (1) the desire to place the detainees beyond the reach of any court or law; (2) the desire to abrogate the Geneva Convention with respect to the treatment of persons seized in the context of armed hostilities; and (3) the desire to absolve those implementing the policies of any liability for war crimes under U.S. and international law.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Regarding the &lt;a href=&quot;http://scoop.agonist.org/story/2005/2/25/93911/1890&quot; title=&quot;The memoranda that comprise this volume follow a logical sequence: (1) find a location secure not only from attack and infiltration, but also, and perhaps more importantly in light of the December 28, 2001, memo that commences this trail, from intervention by the courts; (2) rescind the U.S.&apos;s agreement to abide by the proscriptions of the Geneva Convention with respect to the treatment of persons captured during armed conflict; and (3) provide an interpretation of the law that protects policy makers and their instruments in the field from potential war crimes prosecution for their acts. The result, as clear from the arrogant rectitude emanating from the memos, was unchecked power, and the abuse that inevitably followed.&quot;&gt;Torture&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2005/02/15/features/bookwed.html&quot; title=&quot;&apos;The Torture Papers,&apos; the new compendium of government memos and reports chronicling the road to Abu Ghraib and its aftermath, definitively blows such arguments to pieces. In fact, the book provides a damning paper trail that reveals, in uninflected bureaucratic prose, the roots that those terrible images had in decisions made at the highest levels of the Bush administration - decisions that started the torture snowball rolling down the slippery slope of precedent by asserting that the United States need not abide by the Geneva conventions in its war on terror.&quot;&gt;Papers&lt;/a&gt;, which detail &lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/free/v51/i20/20a01201.htm#torture&quot; title=&quot;Notable Moments In The Torture Debates&quot;&gt;Torture&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/free/v51/i20/20a01201.htm&quot; title=&quot;A new collection of government memoranda, some written by professors, shows how officials justified prisoner abuse in the campaign against terrorism &quot;&gt;Paper Trail&lt;/a&gt;, and, then there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://bostonreview.net/BR30.1/deborahstone.html&quot; title=&quot;By some unholy coincidence, the terms &apos;water boarding&apos; and &apos;air hunger&apos; entered my vocabulary in the same week. They came by such different routes, though, that I didn&#8217;t know how they were related until some time later. &quot;&gt;Hungry for Air&lt;/a&gt;: Learning The Language Of Torture, and, of course, there&apos;s &lt;small&gt;( more inside)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40410</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>GenevaConvention</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>Guantanamo</category>
		<category>GuantanamoBay</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>POWs</category>
		<category>prisoners</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stock Drops Stolen Honor Dropped</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36402/Stock%2DDrops%2DStolen%2DHonor%2DDropped</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/21/politics/campaign/21sinclair.html?oref=login&amp;amp;adxnnl=1&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1098327705-MPvSBAqs3ONHACS7NoZYzg"&gt;Sinclair Broadcast Group&lt;/a&gt; drops full airing of  &quot;Stolen Honor Wounds That Never Heal&quot; but will only show excerpts concurrent with discussion of its claims. &quot;Sinclair announced on Tuesday that it would not broadcast the entire film and that it planned to use segments in a special news program on 40 of its 62 stations tomorrow night. According to a press release, that program, &quot;A P.O.W. Story: Politics, Pressure and the Media,&quot; will examine how politically charged films like &quot;Stolen Honor&quot; are being used in the campaign and how the news media treat their content.&quot; (NY Times, reg. req&apos;d.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36402</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:04:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>documentaries</category>
		<category>newsmedia</category>
		<category>pows</category>
		<category>sinclairbroadcastgroup</category>
		<category>stolenhonor</category>
		<dc:creator>sierray</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>America&apos;s First POWs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33401/Americas%2DFirst%2DPOWs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.powfoundation.org/AmericasFirstPOWs.htm"&gt;America&apos;s First POWs.&lt;/a&gt; The Department of Defense says there were 4,435 battle deaths during the Revolutionary War.  More than twice as many Americans &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsday.com/extras/lihistory/4/hs425a.htm&quot;&gt;died in British prison ships in New York Harbor&lt;/a&gt;.  You can get an idea of their suffering from the news stories I&apos;ve linked, or read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.panix.com/%7Ecassidy/stilesv1/v1c9/331.html&quot;&gt;a more detailed account written in the 1860s&lt;/a&gt; from Henry R. Stiles&apos;s &lt;em&gt;A History of the City of Brooklyn&lt;/em&gt; (scroll down a bit and keep hitting Next).  There are more links at &lt;a href=&quot;http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~promaine/martyrs/index.html&quot;&gt;this site&lt;/a&gt;, which focuses on the long-neglected &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fortgreenepark.org/pages/prisonship.htm&quot;&gt;Monument for the Prison Ship Martyrs&lt;/a&gt; in Brooklyn&apos;s Fort Greene Park.  A remembrance for Memorial Day.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33401</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 10:00:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>MemorialDay</category>
		<category>POWs</category>
		<category>prisonships</category>
		<category>Revolution</category>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>War is hell.  Call my agent.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26442/War%2Dis%2Dhell%2DCall%2Dmy%2Dagent</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/16/business/media/16CBS.html?pagewanted=print&amp;amp;position="&gt;The CBS News American Idol Power Hour.&lt;/a&gt; Viacom, owner of networks CBS and MTV among many others, is aggresively pushing lucrative &lt;s&gt;bribes&lt;/s&gt; offers for Private Jessica Lynch to get her on CBS News, including the possibility of her own video-hosting program on MTV and special editions of TRL.  Corporate consolidation the way it is, are we in an era where synergy allows news-media-owning companies to offer not just material profit but flat-out media iconization in exchange for a good story?  To put it another way: have we gone beyond using the news to promote entertainment owned by the same company to using entertainment as the currency to flat-out buy the news?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26442</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:29:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CBS</category>
		<category>entertainment</category>
		<category>exploitation</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>jessicalynch</category>
		<category>lynch</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>MTV</category>
		<category>POW</category>
		<category>POWs</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What&apos;s going to happen when this is all over?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24557/Whats%2Dgoing%2Dto%2Dhappen%2Dwhen%2Dthis%2Dis%2Dall%2Dover</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14526-2003Mar23.html"&gt;Iraq breaks the Geneva Convention by showing POWs on TV.&lt;/a&gt; To me, this is the first concrete evidence that Iraq is (potentially) breaking the Geneva Convention.  I say potentially because, if we&apos;re an interloper, then I don&apos;t believe the Geneva Convention applies...we&apos;re basically just murderers and invaders, though I might be wrong.  If this IS a &quot;legal war&quot;, then the Convention should apply and there should be questions afterwards; one of the scariest I&apos;ve been asking myself is &quot;If the ICC or the UN decline to prosecute any Iraqis for Geneva Convention violations, will the US just kidnap whomever they want to prosecute?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24557</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2003 11:34:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>genevaconvention</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>iragwar</category>
		<category>pows</category>
		<category>prisonersofwar</category>
		<dc:creator>taumeson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15509/</link>
		<description> &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,1284,665939,00.html&quot;&gt;Rendition&lt;/a&gt;&quot; is the State Department legal term for when they &lt;i&gt;ship&lt;/i&gt; (its a lot like extradition minus due process ) Al Qaida/Taliban POWs to a friendly 3rd country such as  Egypt or Jordan for questioning. 
&quot;Why not just question them in Guantanamo&quot; you ask? Thats because in some countries, interrogation is less regulated than it is on US soil. Neat, huh?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15509</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 06:35:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>interrogation</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>pows</category>
		<category>prisoners</category>
		<category>rendition</category>
		<category>statedepartment</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<dc:creator>BentPenguin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13764/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34179-2002Jan11.html"&gt;Al Quaeda prisoners arrive at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.&lt;/a&gt; With all the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2001/s20011212-secdef.html&quot;&gt;war talk&lt;/a&gt;, why are these men not being classified as POWs? Simply because they didn&apos;t wear uniforms?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13764</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2002 10:38:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alqaeda</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>enemycombatants</category>
		<category>genevaconventions</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>guantanamo</category>
		<category>militarycommissions</category>
		<category>pows</category>
		<category>prisoners</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Ty Webb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


