<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Parist</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Parist</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Parist' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2001 12:23:22 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2001 12:23:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12932/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.filmcomment.com/fcm/11-12-2001/amelie.htm"&gt;Is &lt;i&gt;Amelie&lt;/i&gt; a racist tract? &lt;/a&gt; Yes, it paints a homogenous portrait of Paris, but it&apos;s also obviously a fairy tale. Jeunet&apos;s other films have had a similar cultural makeup yet were never decried as racist - but they were not this successful. Does the outrageous success of the film mean that it should be more representative of France? Should we demand a retroactive revision of a film&apos;s intent as it does more business?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12932</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2001 12:23:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Amelia</category>
		<category>films</category>
		<category>jeunet</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>Parist</category>
		<category>racism</category>
		<dc:creator>videodrome</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


