<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Prediction</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Prediction</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Prediction' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:45:13 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:45:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>What we really want to discover in the near future</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87784/What%2Dwe%2Dreally%2Dwant%2Dto%2Ddiscover%2Din%2Dthe%2Dnear%2Dfuture</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/12/22/2159108.aspx"&gt;Decades of Future Science.&lt;/a&gt; In which advances of the next few decades are wishfully thought up.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.87784</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:45:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>discovery</category>
		<category>fools_errand</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>jjray</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Guitar music is on its way out.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80500/Guitar%2Dmusic%2Dis%2Don%2Dits%2Dway%2Dout</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://wrongtomorrow.com/&quot;&gt;Wrong Tomorrow&lt;/a&gt; is a bit like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.longbets.org/&quot;&gt;Long Bets&lt;/a&gt;, except shorter and without the bets. &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/15836&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/26597/Its-all-for-charidee&quot;&gt;Long&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/55319/Miracles-You%19ll-See-In-The-Next-Fifty-Years&quot;&gt;Bets&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.canada.com/vancouversun/columnists/story.html?id=48bcbef0-f32d-41ae-8525-54eaf71c172f&quot;&gt;articles&lt;/a&gt; about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.articlesworld.com/should-we-believe-the-experts-part-i/&quot;&gt;expert&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/17/pf/experts_Tetlock.moneymag/index.htm&quot;&gt;predictions&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80500</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:24:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cnbc</category>
		<category>expert</category>
		<category>experts</category>
		<category>longbets</category>
		<category>longnow</category>
		<category>longnowfoundation</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>predictions</category>
		<category>pundit</category>
		<category>punditry</category>
		<category>pundits</category>
		<category>righttoday</category>
		<category>toldyouso</category>
		<category>wrongtomorrow</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Economist: The World in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76924/The%2DEconomist%2DThe%2DWorld%2Din%2D2009</link>
		<description> In 2009, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12574162&quot;&gt;a remarkably gifted politician, confronting a remarkably difficult set of challenges&lt;/a&gt;, will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12375981&quot;&gt;have to learn to say &quot;No we can&apos;t&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12574165&quot;&gt;Guant&amp;#0225;namo will prove a moral minefield&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12574168&quot;&gt;economic recovery will be invisible to the naked eye&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494430&quot;&gt;governments must prepare for the day they stop financial guarantees&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494427&quot;&gt;we will judge our commitment to sustainability&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494436&quot;&gt;scientists should research the causes of religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12499877&quot;&gt;we will all be potential online paparazzi&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494445&quot;&gt;English will have more words than any other language&lt;/a&gt; (but it&apos;s meaningless), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494516&quot;&gt;Afghanistan will see a surge of Western (read: American) troops&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494545&quot;&gt;Iran will continue its nuclear quest&lt;/a&gt; while &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494575&quot;&gt;diplomacy lies in shambles&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494593&quot;&gt;the sea floor is the new frontier&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494596&quot;&gt;we should rethink aging&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494470&quot;&gt;(non-)voters will continue to thwart the European project&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494473&quot;&gt;but cheap travel will continue to buoy it&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494503&quot;&gt;though it has some unfinished business to attend to&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494485&quot;&gt;a Nordic defence bond will blossom&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/&quot;&gt;The Economist: The World in 2009&lt;/a&gt;. Previously: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/66976/The-Economist-The-World-in-2008&quot;&gt;2008&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/56666/The-Economist-The-World-in-2007&quot;&gt;2007&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494578&quot;&gt;How did we do&lt;/a&gt; last time around? And what will we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494581&quot;&gt;probably be wrong about&lt;/a&gt; this time?


Guest contributions:

President of Brazil Luiz In&amp;#0225;cio Lula da Silva &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494572&quot;&gt;seeks greater international cooperation and sees a growing global role for the larger emerging economies&lt;/a&gt;.

Queen of Jordan Rania &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494560&quot;&gt;calls for education reform&lt;/a&gt;.

Prime Minister of Australia Kevin Rudd &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494537&quot;&gt;calls upon mid-size powers to be creative and effective with their influence&lt;/a&gt;.

Prime Minister of Spain Jos&amp;#0233; Luis Rodr&amp;#0237;guez Zapatero &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494491&quot;&gt;emphasizes the importance of transparency and solidarity in Europe&lt;/a&gt;.

Prime Minister of Ukraine Yulia Tymoshenko, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494497&quot;&gt;wedged between Russia and the EU, cites historical precedent&lt;/a&gt;.

Former Secretary of State of the United States, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Henry Kissinger &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12574180&quot;&gt;argues America will be less powerful, but will still be the essential nation in creating a new world order&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494497&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Mayor Boris Johnson of London &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494467&quot;&gt; argues against over-regulation&lt;/a&gt;.


Elections to watch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494563&quot;&gt;Brazil, Chile&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494470&quot;&gt;European Parliament&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494476&quot;&gt;Germany&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494534&quot;&gt;Indonesia&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494548&quot;&gt;Israel&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494528&quot;&gt;Japan&lt;/a&gt;.


Also: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494494&quot;&gt;Russia will enter its first real difficult years under Putin&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494452&quot;&gt;Brown might not make it&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494433&quot;&gt;we won&apos;t ban nukes but we can pretend&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494569&quot;&gt;Ontario will receive economic help from other provinces&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494531&quot;&gt;Australians will grow ever more thirsty&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494458&quot;&gt;Britain needs to make stuff again&lt;/a&gt;.


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/blogs/theworldin2009/&quot;&gt;World in 2009 blog&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76924</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:00:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2009</category>
		<category>afghanistan</category>
		<category>arctic</category>
		<category>barackobama</category>
		<category>creditcrisis</category>
		<category>creditcrunch</category>
		<category>cuba</category>
		<category>currentaffairs</category>
		<category>currentevents</category>
		<category>diplomacy</category>
		<category>economist</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>endofyear</category>
		<category>endofyearlists</category>
		<category>english</category>
		<category>eu</category>
		<category>europe</category>
		<category>europeanunion</category>
		<category>facebook</category>
		<category>financialcrisis</category>
		<category>gas</category>
		<category>guantanamo</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>iran</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>magiceightball</category>
		<category>myspace</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>nuclearpower</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>nuke</category>
		<category>nukes</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>ocean</category>
		<category>oceanfloor</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>petrol</category>
		<category>petroleum</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>predictions</category>
		<category>presidentobama</category>
		<category>sea</category>
		<category>seabed</category>
		<category>seafloor</category>
		<category>surge</category>
		<category>sustainability</category>
		<category>sustainable</category>
		<category>theeconomist</category>
		<category>thesurge</category>
		<category>theworldin</category>
		<category>theworldin2009</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>world</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Brief History of the Twenty-First Century</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75474/Brief%2DHistory%2Dof%2Dthe%2DTwentyFirst%2DCentury</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/chuck-klostermans-america/brief-history-21st-century-1008"&gt;A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75474</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:34:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>esquire</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>klosterman</category>
		<category>mccain</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>phrontist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lies, Damn Lies, Statistics...and Voter Polls</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74703/Lies%2DDamn%2DLies%2DStatisticsand%2DVoter%2DPolls</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2008/09/05/02"&gt;Margins of Error&lt;/a&gt; We can&apos;t seem to let the future alone.  Even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2189135/pagenum/all/&quot;&gt;though we often get predictions about it so wrong&lt;/a&gt;.  Because, as Niels Bohr once said, &quot;Prediction is very difficult.  Especially if it is about the future.&quot;  What are the origins of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~tonya/309m/class/paper4/bowser/opinpoll.htm&quot;&gt;political polling&lt;/a&gt; (beware of awful interface design)?  And how &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2008/09/05/03&quot;&gt;is political polling evolving&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74703</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:40:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>margins</category>
		<category>politicalpolls</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<dc:creator>jeanmari</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bricks from ashes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74124/Bricks%2Dfrom%2Dashes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iftf.org/node/2098"&gt;Superstruct:&lt;/a&gt; An alternate reality game of future survival from the woman who brought you I Love Bees. Starting soon.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74124</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:55:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2019</category>
		<category>alternatereality</category>
		<category>alternaterealitygame</category>
		<category>ARG</category>
		<category>forecast</category>
		<category>free</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>futurecast</category>
		<category>game</category>
		<category>instituteofthefuture</category>
		<category>JaneMcGonigal</category>
		<category>McGonigal</category>
		<category>narrative</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>scifi</category>
		<category>sci-fi</category>
		<category>speculative</category>
		<category>text-based</category>
		<dc:creator>klangklangston</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dopamine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74066/Dopamine</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/08/a_new_state_of_mind.php"&gt;A New State of Mind.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;New research is linking &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dopamine&quot;&gt;dopamine&lt;/a&gt; to complex social phenomena&lt;/a&gt; and changing neuroscience in the process.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74066</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:30:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Addiction</category>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Chemistry</category>
		<category>Cognition</category>
		<category>Dopamine</category>
		<category>Evolution</category>
		<category>fMRI</category>
		<category>Hyper-scanning</category>
		<category>Ideas</category>
		<category>Learning</category>
		<category>Loins</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Neurons</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Neurotransmitters</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Prediction</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Rewards</category>
		<category>Smoking</category>
		<category>Society</category>
		<category>StockMarket</category>
		<category>TDRL</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>IBM&apos;s next 5 in 5</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71793/IBMs%2Dnext%2D5%2Din%2D5</link>
		<description> IBM&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibm.com/ibm/ideasfromibm/ca/en/five_in_five/20080512/index.shtml?sa_campaign=message_ca_en/leadspace/all/innovation&quot;&gt;the next 5 in 5&lt;/a&gt; &quot;forecasts the five innovations that will change the way that we live, work and play in the next five years.&quot; An interesting list that covers a lot of landscape. I for one doubt that my socialized Canadian medicine will pay for a 3-D digital medical record. I would imagine only the rich, professional athletes, and cosmetic surgery aficionados  will take part. However, I do agree that my life will increasingly, and depressingly, revolve more around my cellphone.

Also, a link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibm.com/ibm/ideasfromibm/us/five_in_five/010807/index.shtml&quot;&gt;last year&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; . </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71793</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:26:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>IBM</category>
		<category>innovation</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<dc:creator>dobie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This thread will end well. Buy at 61.7; sell at 60.1.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71714/This%2Dthread%2Dwill%2Dend%2Dwell%2DBuy%2Dat%2D617%2Dsell%2Dat%2D601</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/320/5878/877&quot;&gt;The Promise of Prediction Markets&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt; (full text link; .pdf &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/320/5878/877.pdf&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;. A group of distinguished economists and other scholars has published a call to exempt &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market&quot;&gt;prediction markets&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(previously on MeFi: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/57068/Open-source-markets&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/45394/Google-starts-an-internal-futures-market&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt; from American laws that restrict internet gambling. The group was supported by the American Enterprise Institute&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reg-markets.org/index.php&quot;&gt;Reg-Markets Center&lt;/a&gt;, which includes several of the authors on its advisory board. They suggest that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission - which recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cftc.gov/newsroom/generalpressreleases/2008/pr5493-08.html&quot;&gt;sought public comment&lt;/a&gt; on the issue - establish a &quot;safe harbor&quot; for small-stakes markets. PM boosters are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.knowledgeproblem.com/archives/002492.html&quot;&gt;ambivalent&lt;/a&gt; about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.midasoracle.org/tag/cftc/&quot;&gt;idea&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71714</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:54:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>crowds</category>
		<category>exchange</category>
		<category>forecasting</category>
		<category>markets</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>speculation</category>
		<dc:creator>googly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Solar Cycle 24 Prediction</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60664/Solar%2DCycle%2D24%2DPrediction</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sec.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/SC24/index.html"&gt;This is interesting.&lt;/a&gt; Presented by the NOAA Space Environment Center (SEC)

The official NOAA, NASA, and ISES Solar Cycle 24 prediction was
released by the Solar Cycle 24 Prediction Panel on April 25, 2007. The
Prediction Panel included members from NOAA, NASA, ISES and other US
and International representatives. Press Briefings and presentations at
the SEC Space Weather Workshop, plus additional announcements and
information from the Panel are linked below. The Panel expects to
update this prediction annually.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60664</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:13:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Prediction</category>
		<category>SolarCycle24</category>
		<dc:creator>RoseyD</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Biggest breakthroughs of the next 50 years</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56402/Biggest%2Dbreakthroughs%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dnext%2D50%2Dyears</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/channel/opinion/science-forecasts"&gt;What will be the biggest scientific breakthroughs of the next 50 years?&lt;/a&gt; As part of their 50th anniversary celebration, the New Scientist asked 70 prominent minds for ideas on the subject. You can read the thoughts of scientists like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sns.ias.edu/~dyson/&quot;&gt;Freeman Dyson&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.math.yale.edu/mandelbrot/&quot;&gt;Benoit Mandelbrot&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.janegoodall.org/&quot;&gt;Jane Goodall&lt;/a&gt; individually, or browse by topic. For example, eight thinkers have something to say about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/search.ns?doSearch=true&amp;query=keyword%3A50th+AND+keyword%3Aforecast+AND+keyword%3Aalien%2Blife&quot;&gt;alien life&lt;/a&gt;. The links to browse by topic can be found at the beginning of the main link. Also, compare with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/55319&quot;&gt;this thread&lt;/a&gt; about similar predictions from 1950.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56402</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:52:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Dyson</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>Goodall</category>
		<category>Mandelbrot</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>jeffmshaw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Miracles You&#8217;ll See In The Next Fifty Years</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55319/Miracles%2DYou%3Fll%2DSee%2DIn%2DThe%2DNext%2DFifty%2DYears</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/10/05/miracles-youll-see-in-the-next-fifty-years/"&gt;Miracles You&#8217;ll See In The Next Fifty Years&lt;/a&gt; (Feb, 1950)&lt;br /&gt; Some more up-to-date predictions: &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6119231548215342323&quot;&gt;science&lt;/a&gt;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://encarta.msn.com/column_GreatInventions/Great_Inventions_of_the_Next_Fifty_Years.html&quot;&gt;invention&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spacedaily.com/2003/031016024357.yvvtcqwo.html&quot;&gt;space&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviationspace/c78c5b4a1db84010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html&quot;&gt;travel&lt;/a&gt;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,750783,00.html&quot;&gt;colonisation&lt;/a&gt;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1489635,00.html&quot;&gt;immortality&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,20148421-5001028,00.html&quot;&gt;water&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/water/story/0,,1851712,00.html&quot;&gt;shortage&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://flood.firetree.net/&quot;&gt;flooding&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://smalley.rice.edu/smalley.cfm?doc_id=5336&quot;&gt;nanotech&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2465/is_7_30/ai_66457050&quot;&gt;techno-apocalypse&lt;/a&gt;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ranprieur.com/readings/weeds.html&quot;&gt;extinction&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/conferences/easyread/show_paper.asp?section=000100030002&amp;confcode=000200060005&amp;page=5&quot;&gt;mental health&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000AAAC0-5762-1C75-9B81809EC588EF21&quot;&gt;smart machines&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kwiley/mindRamblings/robotsMindUploading.html&quot;&gt;robots, mind uploading&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/featured_articles/v12n02_AI_gone_awry.html&quot;&gt;AI&lt;/a&gt;, 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2004/01/12/357912/index.htm&quot;&gt;Asia&lt;/a&gt;, 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://in.rediff.com/money/2003/oct/28india.htm&quot;&gt;economics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/agenda/displaystory.cfm?story_id=1291056&quot;&gt;demographics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brook.edu/comm/transcripts/20011220.htm&quot;&gt;goverance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/5094602.stm&quot;&gt;cities&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nickbostrom.com/2050/world.html&quot;&gt;What&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hackwriters.com/Readingrunes.htm&quot;&gt;is&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hackwriters.com/FutureResponse.htm&quot;&gt;your&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.longbets.org/predictions&quot;&gt;prediction&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55319</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:24:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2050</category>
		<category>ai</category>
		<category>apocalypse</category>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>climate</category>
		<category>collapse</category>
		<category>demographics</category>
		<category>ecology</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>extinction</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>invention</category>
		<category>mars</category>
		<category>mentalhealth</category>
		<category>miracles</category>
		<category>nanotechnology</category>
		<category>population</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>robots</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>systems</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>virtualreality</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>water</category>
		<dc:creator>MetaMonkey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Handicapping the midterms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52897/Handicapping%2Dthe%2Dmidterms</link>
		<description> As in the 2004 elections, several useful sites have sprung up to keep track of the 2006 midterms for House, Senate and state gubernatorial races.  Some have a political point of view, others don&apos;t, but they don&apos;t differ significantly on the outcome at this point.  One of the veterans in this game is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electionprojection.com/&quot;&gt;ElectionProjection.com&lt;/a&gt;, which was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electionprojection.com/elections2004.html&quot;&gt;pretty close to actual results&lt;/a&gt; in &apos;04.  (A creation of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electionprojection.com/bloggingcaesar.html&quot;&gt;&quot;the Blogging Caesar&quot;)&lt;/a&gt;.  From the right, there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myelectionanalysis.com/&quot;&gt;MyElectionAnalysis.com&lt;/a&gt;, while &lt;a href=&quot;http://electionpredictions.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;ElectionPredictions&lt;/a&gt; seems to come from a neutral corner.  All of these track statewide polls as they are published; they may differ in how they weight results.  For a more subjective approach, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/&quot;&gt;Larry Sabato&apos;s Crystal Ball&lt;/a&gt; or the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cookpolitical.com/&quot;&gt;Cook Political Report&lt;/a&gt;.   Overall, the consensus seems to be that the GOP will hold both houses, but with slimmer margins, and lose on the gubernatorial front.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52897</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:54:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>governor</category>
		<category>house</category>
		<category>midterms</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<dc:creator>beagle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gaze into my crystal ball...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47813/Gaze%2Dinto%2Dmy%2Dcrystal%2Dball</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.btplc.com/Innovation/News/timeline/index.htm"&gt;BT Technology Timeline 2006-2051&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s interesting to see a major company such as BT set a timeline such as this, especially as they say thier 1990 timeline has had around 80% accuracy. They predict a supercomputer as powerful as the human mind in 2006, self aware computers that pass the turing test by 2020, and the rise of a global computer dictator by and artificial brain around 2040. After that its hard to predict, you know with the singularity coming and all...

Some of the interesting things they predict: genetically engineered teddy bears; androids form 10% of the population around 2015; the Matrix is created, 2030; thought recognition as input device by 2014; the list goes on and on. 

Discuss. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/76557/bt-looks-into-the-future.html&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47813</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:33:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>singularity</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>daHIFI</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Probability senses tingling batman!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47494/Probability%2Dsenses%2Dtingling%2Dbatman</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/critics/books/articles/051205crbo_books1&quot;&gt;Experts can suck at predicting the future.&lt;/a&gt;  Their intuitive sense of probability is no more developed than lay-people&apos;s.  A classic experiment is to present two indistinguishable choices are presented, but with unequal probability of reward.  Humans look for complex patterns, which don&apos;t exist, and preform quite poorly.  Rats quickly recognize the choice with higher probability, and preform optimally.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47494</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:38:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>batman</category>
		<category>expert</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>probability</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<dc:creator>jeffburdges</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Consensus of Crowds</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45206/The%2DConsensus%2Dof%2DCrowds</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.consensusview.com/"&gt;Consensus View&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/&quot;&gt;New Yorker&lt;/a&gt; columnist James Surowiecki&apos;s book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.randomhouse.com/features/wisdomofcrowds/&quot;&gt;The Wisdom of Crowds&lt;/a&gt; &quot;explores a deceptively simple idea that has profound implications: large groups of people are smarter than an elite few, no matter how brilliant&#8212;better at solving problems, fostering innovation, coming to wise decisions, even predicting the future.&quot; Now this idea has been put into practice with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consensusview.com/&quot;&gt;Consensus View&lt;/a&gt;, a site where you can enter your predictions on stocks, commodities, and currencies, and view the group consensus. (from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wsj.com/&quot;&gt;wsj.com&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45206</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 17:52:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>consensus</category>
		<category>crowds</category>
		<category>markets</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>stocks</category>
		<dc:creator>reverendX</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;A Possible Declining Trend for Worldwide Innovation,&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42492/A%2DPossible%2DDeclining%2DTrend%2Dfor%2DWorldwide%2DInnovation</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://accelerating.org/articles/huebnerinnovation.html&quot;&gt;Review of &quot;A Possible Declining Trend for Worldwide Innovation,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; by Jonathan Huebner, who says the rate of human innovation has been steadily declining since the industrial revolution, and is headed toward an &quot;economic limit&quot; of very low apparent innovation that will be reached circa 2038. As one potential explanation, we must consider the possibility that human-initiated innovation, like energy consumption and population growth, is a process that naturally saturates with rising global income levels and technological intelligence--as technological progress increasingly satisfies current human needs, individuals become less concerned with technological development and turn more toward personal growth. More articles from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.accelerationwatch.com/&quot;&gt;Acceleration Watch&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42492</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:22:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>huebner</category>
		<category>innovation</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The future of war is thus: information technology grows no potatoes.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40457/The%2Dfuture%2Dof%2Dwar%2Dis%2Dthus%2Dinformation%2Dtechnology%2Dgrows%2Dno%2Dpotatoes</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;small&gt;It is more likely than not that most of America&#8217;s enemies in the near future will continue to be at least as awkwardly and inconveniently asymmetrical as they have been over the past 15 years. However, it would be grossly imprudent to assume that they will all be led by politicians as incompetent at grand strategy as Saddam Hussein or Slobodan Milosevic. There is probably a General Aideed lurking out there, not to mention a General Giap. A no-less-troubling thought is recognition of the certainty that America&#8217;s strategic future will witness enemies initially of the second-rate, and eventually of the first... One may choose to recall the old aphorism that &#8220;unless you have fought the Germans, you don&#8217;t really know war.&#8221; That thought, though one hopes not its precise national example, holds for the future.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usawc/parameters/05spring/gray.htm&quot; title=&quot;All things are possible, but they are not all equally probable. By the 2020s and then beyond, the defining threats of the century most likely will stem from a dangerous combination of the return of active great-power geopolitical rivalry and an accelerating global environmental crisis. Those theorists who would have us believe that in the information age geography does not matter will be shown to have been comprehensively in error. Global warming inevitably will place a premium upon old-fashioned territoriality. To coin a phrase, &apos;information technology grows no potatoes.&apos; Land, indeed access to material resources, will be at a premium, as it has been throughout history.&quot;&gt;How Has War Changed Since the End of the Cold War?&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#0160;The answer seems to be not that much at all: &lt;em&gt;The truth of the matter is that war is not changing its character, let alone miraculously accomplishing the impossible and changing its nature. &lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40457</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:10:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>forecast</category>
		<category>futurism</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>strategy</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Imagining the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38497/Imagining%2Dthe%2DInternet</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.elon.edu/predictions/"&gt;Imagining the Internet.&lt;/a&gt; What will become of the internet?  And how far off have prognosticators been about it thus far?  Submit your own predictions, if you dare.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38497</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:11:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Election 2004: Step Right Up and Win Some Crap</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36366/Election%2D2004%2DStep%2DRight%2DUp%2Dand%2DWin%2DSome%2DCrap</link>
		<description> Two weeks from today, John Kerry will win the popular vote by &quot;23% or more&quot; over George W. Bush, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.5starpsychicadvice.com/PsychicPredictionsFor2004.html&quot;&gt;5 Star Psychic Advice&lt;/a&gt;. See if you can do better than the spirit world by predicting the electoral and popular vote totals in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/stories/2001/05/24/presidential-election-predictions.html&quot;&gt;second&lt;/a&gt; quadrennial MetaFilter Presidential Contest ...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36366</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:56:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2004</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>contest</category>
		<category>kerry</category>
		<category>metafilter</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>president</category>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Electorometrics?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32959/Electorometrics</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://newyorker.com/talk/content/?040510ta_talk_mcgrath"&gt;More Election Predictions.&lt;/a&gt; Not based on ideological politics, but on the way &lt;a href=&quot;http://newyorker.com/talk/content/?040510ta_talk_mcgrath&quot;&gt;they speak&lt;/a&gt;, or perhaps on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/vote2004/index2.htm&quot;&gt;way the economy moves&lt;/a&gt;, on top of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/&quot;&gt;futures markets&lt;/a&gt;. Are we moving toward Electorometrics?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32959</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 19:28:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>markets</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<dc:creator>weston</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Why 2004 will be like 1984</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30579/Why%2D2004%2Dwill%2Dbe%2Dlike%2D1984</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit029.html#mspath"&gt;A dim view of Microsoft&apos;s 2004.&lt;/a&gt; Not that there aren&apos;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20040101.html&quot;&gt;plenty&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.esj.com/enterprise/article.asp?EditorialsID=797&quot;&gt; of &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slashnot.com/article.php3?story_id=346&quot;&gt;predictions&lt;/a&gt; out there, but this is the most in-depth look at the new face of our favourite anti-competitor I&apos;ve seen yet.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30579</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2004 20:53:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>stock</category>
		<dc:creator>bonaldi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Phillip K. Dick is God</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28891/Phillip%2DK%2DDick%2Dis%2DGod</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.infinitematrix.net/faq/editorials/index.html"&gt;Science fiction writers on Arnold Schwarzenegger&apos;s election&lt;/a&gt; as California gov.  (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28891</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2003 04:48:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>futurism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>schwarzenegger</category>
		<category>sciencefiction</category>
		<category>sf</category>
		<dc:creator>Tlogmer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>polyphonic HSS</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24232/polyphonic%2DHSS</link>
		<description> Based on a software analysis of 250,000 CDs for mathematical patterns, and further analysis of the last 5 years of Billboards&apos; Top 30, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.polyphonichmi.com/about_us.html&quot;&gt; Polyphonic HMI&lt;/a&gt; thinks they know what it takes to rock your world (i.e., cause a song to shoot up the charts). Of course, major labels &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/12/arts/music/12POPL.html&quot;&gt;are interested&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(NYT link, scroll halfway down).&lt;/small&gt; Will this cause &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swingmusic.net/WHAT.html&quot;&gt;mainstream radio &lt;/a&gt;to be overrun with inane, soul-crushingly similar music, and crowd out anything different or interesting? Because I wouldn&apos;t like that!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24232</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:08:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Clearchannel</category>
		<category>homogenization</category>
		<category>Music</category>
		<category>Polyphonic</category>
		<category>Prediction</category>
		<category>Tastemaking</category>
		<dc:creator>luser</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19658/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/17339"&gt;Remember that MeFi post on earthquake prediction?&lt;/a&gt; They did it again. There was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Quakes/ci09818433.htm&quot;&gt;4.6 quake&lt;/a&gt; yesterday near Santa Barbara that hit the bullseye. Compare the map of &lt;a href=&quot;http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Maps/118-34.gif&quot;&gt;where the quake hit&lt;/a&gt; to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pnas.org/content/vol99/issue90001/images/large/pq0125818004.jpeg&quot;&gt;prediction map&lt;/a&gt;. 

That&apos;s at least five accurate predictions since the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/99/suppl_1/2514.pdf&quot;&gt;scientific paper&lt;/a&gt; (pdf) was released earlier this year.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19658</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2002 06:13:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>earthquake</category>
		<category>earthquakeprediction</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


