<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Presidentbush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Presidentbush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Presidentbush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:10:54 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:10:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Zen and the Art of Mountain Biking with the President</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53736/Zen%2Dand%2Dthe%2DArt%2Dof%2DMountain%2DBiking%2Dwith%2Dthe%2DPresident</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://asap.ap.org/stories/560965.s"&gt;Mountain Bike One.&lt;/a&gt; What it&apos;s like to hit the trails with the President: a little Zen, a few &lt;a href=&quot;http://asap.ap.org/stories/1650.s&quot;&gt;Band&lt;/a&gt;-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/06/bush.bike/&quot;&gt;aids&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53736</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:10:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bike</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>involuntarydismount</category>
		<category>mountainbike</category>
		<category>president</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<dc:creator>gottabefunky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Happy birthday, Mr President. Here&apos;s a present.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52817/Happy%2Dbirthday%2DMr%2DPresident%2DHeres%2Da%2Dpresent</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/president-bush/nintendo-gifts-ds-lite-to-president-bush-185282.php"&gt;For his 60th birthday,&lt;/a&gt; Nintendo of America sends President Bush a present: a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nintendo.com/channel/ds&quot;&gt;DS Lite&lt;/a&gt; and a copy of the smash-hit game &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/ds/brainage&quot;&gt;Brain Age: Train Your Brain In Minutes A Day&lt;/a&gt; along with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/president-bush/nintendo-gifts-ds-lite-to-president-bush-185282.php&quot;&gt;great covering letter&lt;/a&gt;. An astute piece of marketing? An honest gift? Or just a nice bit of guerrilla humour?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52817</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:36:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>birthday</category>
		<category>brainage</category>
		<category>nintendods</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<dc:creator>Hogshead</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Someone steal a Diebold and reverse engineer pls tia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45069/Someone%2Dsteal%2Da%2DDiebold%2Dand%2Dreverse%2Dengineer%2Dpls%2Dtia</link>
		<description> At this challenging time for President Bush, let us &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chuckherrin.com/hackthevotedemo.htm&quot;&gt;reminisce&lt;/a&gt; about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.diebold.com/dieboldes/GEMS.htm&quot;&gt;system&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.equalccw.com/deandemo.html&quot;&gt;elected&lt;/a&gt; him. Will the next election be different? Do you want it to be? What are you going to do about it&lt;a href=&quot;http://o-ox-ox1.org/cthulhuchick/&quot;&gt;?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45069</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:25:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>PresidentBush</category>
		<category>UnitedStatesofAmerica</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Pretty_Generic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Wrong War &amp;amp; Exit Strategy:Civil War &amp;amp; News From Kirkuk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42777/The%2DWrong%2DWar%2Dand%2DExit%2DStrategyCivil%2DWar%2Dand%2DNews%2DFrom%2DKirkuk</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;A distinction between &#8220;old&#8221; and &#8220;new&#8221; wars is vital. &#8220;Old wars&#8221; are wars between states where the aim is the military capture of territory and the decisive encounter is battle between armed forces. &#8220;New wars&#8221;, in contrast, take place in the context of failing states. They are wars fought by networks of state and non-state actors, where battles are rare and violence is directed mainly against civilians, and which are characterised by a new type of political economy that combines extremist politics and criminality... I argue in this article that the United States viewed its invasion of Iraq as an updated version of &#8220;old war&#8221; that made use of new technology. The US failure to understand the reality on the ground in Iraq and the tendency to impose its own view of what war should be like is immensely dangerous and carries the risk of being self-perpetuating. It does not have to be this way. &lt;/small&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/articles/ViewPopUpArticle.jsp?id=2&amp;articleId=2591&quot; title=&quot;In early June 2005, it is hard to be optimistic. The insurgency is escalating - more attacks, more casualties, more groups and more names are reported daily. The idea of Bush as a successful wartime leader, pioneering the new technology-intensive form of warfare, helped contribute to his November 2004 election victory; the more hawkish elements of his first administration have been reappointed and promoted. The American pursuit of a moral crusade reinforces the insurgents&#8217; notion of a global jihad. Indeed, the new war in Iraq can increasingly be viewed as the stage for a global new war, which will be hard to contain as the ideas and experiences spread and hard to end because of the bitterness, fear and hate that are mobilised in war... Will reality bring about a questioning of the story of old war and its contemporary relevance? Are other actors - the United Nations, the European Union, together with Iraqi civil society - able, even at this late stage, to develop an alternative strategy: one based on constructive, democratic, forward-thinking principles that could offer a convincing way forward for Iraq&#8217;s people, and might help to avert a global new war?&quot;&gt;Iraq: the wrong war &lt;/a&gt; - Mary Kaldor writes of what was happening in pre-invasion Iraq, what happened thereafter and what the alternatives were. Well, there is always &lt;a href=&quot;http://207.44.245.159/article9099.htm&quot; title=&quot;Against all odds, a national liberation front is emerging in Iraq. Washington hawks may see it coming, but they certainly don&apos;t want it. Many groups in this front have already met in Algiers. The front is opposed to the American occupation and permanent Pentagon military bases; opposed to the privatization and corporate looting of the Iraqi economy; and opposed to the federation of Iraq, ie balkanization... The Bush administration though is pulling no punches with Iraqification. It&apos;s a Pandora&apos;s box: inside one will find the Battle of Algiers, Vietnam, El Salvador, Colombia. All point to the same destination: civil war. This deadly litany could easily go on until 2020 when, in a brave new world of China emerging as the top economy, Sunni Arabs would finally convince themselves to perhaps strike a deal with Shi&apos;ites and Kurds so they can all profit together by selling billions of barrels of oil to the Chinese oil majors. If, of course, there is any semblance of Iraq left at that point.&quot;&gt;Exit strategy: Civil war.&lt;/a&gt;  And on that, note this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/14/AR2005061401828_pf.html&quot; title=&quot;Police and security units, forces led by Kurdish political parties and backed by the U.S. military, have abducted hundreds of minority Arabs and Turkmens in this intensely volatile city and spirited them to prisons in Kurdish-held northern Iraq, according to U.S. and Iraqi officials, government documents and families of the victims. Seized off the streets of Kirkuk or in joint U.S.-Iraqi raids, the men have been transferred secretly and in violation of Iraqi law to prisons in the Kurdish cities of Irbil and Sulaymaniyah, sometimes with the knowledge of U.S. forces. The detainees, including merchants, members of tribal families and soldiers, have often remained missing for months; some have been tortured, according to released prisoners and the Kirkuk police chief.&quot;&gt;Kurdish Officials Sanction Abductions in Kirkuk&lt;/a&gt;--a city from which, I am afraid, we will hear more and more as time goes by.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42777</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:17:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>exitstrategy</category>
		<category>failedstates</category>
		<category>failingstates</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqWar</category>
		<category>MaryKaldor</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>strategy</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WMDs</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>stem cell immortality russia godless</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40564/stem%2Dcell%2Dimmortality%2Drussia%2Dgodless</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id=160&amp;msg_id=5464269&amp;startrow=1&amp;date=2005-03-16&amp;do_alert=0&quot;&gt;&quot;Russian Oligarachs Want Immortality&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.  Vladimir Bryntsalov has had a course of stem cell injections and feels no older than 20, though his biological age is about 60. Treatment will cost you $10,000-20,000 in Moscow.  In many Western countries, such clinics would not even get the opportunity to open their doors. During a recent speech, President Bush denounced stem cell therapy as &quot;godless.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40564</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:51:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>moscow</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>russian</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<category>Vladimirbryntsalov</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>not one damn dime</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38549/not%2Done%2Ddamn%2Ddime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.notonedamndime.com"&gt;Boycott&lt;/a&gt; Bush&apos;s inauguration by not spending any money on inauguration day  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38549</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 02:24:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>boycott</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>inaugaration</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<dc:creator>three blind mice</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What&apos;s with the scuffles this weekend?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37127/Whats%2Dwith%2Dthe%2Dscuffles%2Dthis%2Dweekend</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thecarolinachannel.com/news/3937064/detail.html"&gt;George &quot;Don&apos;t mess with my homies&quot; Bush.&lt;/a&gt; So, evidently, our president got in a scuffle.  Yes, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A2550-2004Nov21?language=printer&quot;&gt;scuffle.  &lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37127</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 20:17:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chile</category>
		<category>fisticuffs</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>nicktrotta</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>scuffle</category>
		<category>secretservice</category>
		<dc:creator>_sirmissalot_</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This is what happens when you give people civil rights... damn hippies</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36320/This%2Dis%2Dwhat%2Dhappens%2Dwhen%2Dyou%2Dgive%2Dpeople%2Dcivil%2Drights%2Ddamn%2Dhippies</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1015-06.htm"&gt;Protecting our civil rights?&lt;/a&gt; We&apos;ve seen the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amconmag.com/12_15_03/feature.html&quot;&gt;free speech zones&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/09/21/414fd61e0a541&quot;&gt;kicking &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://talkleft.com/new_archives/007851.html&quot;&gt;hair-pulling&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/_/id/6417592?pageid=rs.Politics&amp;pageregion=single5&amp;rnd=1098026825211&amp;has-player=true&amp;version=6.0.12.1040&quot;&gt;loyalty oaths&lt;/a&gt;/&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/10/12/191834/48&quot;&gt;essays&lt;/a&gt; - but did you think that just mentioning the protection of &lt;a href=&quot;http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/funddocs/billeng.htm&quot;&gt;civil rights &lt;/a&gt;would get you thrown out of a Bush speech?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36320</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:35:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<dc:creator>bashos_frog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sleeping with the president is not a good idea.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35699/Sleeping%2Dwith%2Dthe%2Dpresident%2Dis%2Dnot%2Da%2Dgood%2Didea</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/wire/World/ap20040919_81.html"&gt;Sleeping with the president is not a good idea.&lt;/a&gt; Bush had no answers to big questions, such as &apos;what happens on the morning after.&apos; The Daily Telegraph reports that documents show Prime Minister Tony Blair signed up to the U.S. policy of regime change in March 2002, a year before the conflict started... after he was warned that postwar stability would be difficult and the U.S. had few answers. Oh, no problem. This week, &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/18/bush.iraq/index.html&quot;&gt;Bush said he is &apos;pleased with the progress&apos; in Iraq.&apos;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35699</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:18:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanHistory</category>
		<category>Blair</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>lapdogs</category>
		<category>MiddleEast</category>
		<category>Mideast</category>
		<category>PresidentBush</category>
		<category>TonyBlair</category>
		<category>USHistory</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>fleener</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Worth Sharing II</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33446/Worth%2DSharing%2DII</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/06/20040602.html"&gt;Remarks by President Bush&lt;/a&gt; Long, but worth it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33446</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 01:45:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airforce</category>
		<category>airforceacademy</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>commencement</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>speech</category>
		<category>speeches</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>usafa</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>David Dark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>George Says</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32449/George%2DSays</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.george-says.com/"&gt;George Says&lt;/a&gt; Did the president fail to answer your questions tonight? Put the words right in his mouth.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32449</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:06:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<dc:creator>ColdChef</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>George W Bush and the real state of the Union</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30841/George%2DW%2DBush%2Dand%2Dthe%2Dreal%2Dstate%2Dof%2Dthe%2DUnion</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=482947"&gt;George W Bush and the real state of the Union.&lt;/a&gt; Today the President gives his annual address. As the election battle begins, how does his first term add up? It&apos;s all been said before but it&apos;s good (?) to see it all nicely put together.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30841</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 06:32:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>IRAQ</category>
		<category>PresidentBush</category>
		<category>SOTU</category>
		<category>speeches</category>
		<category>StateoftheUnion</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>acrobat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dear George</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29692/Dear%2DGeorge</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,1087583,00.html"&gt;Dear President Bush,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;I&apos;m sure you&apos;ll be having a nice little tea party with your fellow war criminal, Tony Blair. Please wash the cucumber sandwiches down with a glass of blood, with my compliments.  
Harold Pinter, Playwright. &lt;/em&gt;  

Some caustic open letters in The Guardian for the big state visit.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29692</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:33:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blair</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>haroldpinter</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>letters</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>tonyblair</category>
		<dc:creator>serafinapekkala</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I poo on Godwin&apos;s Law, but this isn&apos;t GW&apos;s fault....</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29036/I%2Dpoo%2Don%2DGodwins%2DLaw%2Dbut%2Dthis%2Disnt%2DGWs%2Dfault</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/101903I.shtml"&gt;Trading with the Enemy (Prescott Bush was a bad man)&lt;/a&gt; - The mainstream press &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.com/news?q=Union+Bank,+Thyssen,+Prescott+Bush&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;c2coff=1&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=nn&quot;&gt;decides to bring up the Bush/Nazi connection&lt;/a&gt; - Newly declassified documents shed new light on the shady beginnings of the Bush family&apos;s dynastic wealth: through GW Bush&apos;s grandfather Prescott Bush&apos;s work as a director of a US bank which was both controlled by the German industrialist Thyssen (who played a key role in bankrolling Hitler&apos;s rise to power) and which continued to launder Thyssen Group profits after the US declaration of war against Germany. But if you&apos;ve been reading Metafilter closely, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/24180#452037&quot;&gt;you would have known the facts&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/22481#407983&quot;&gt;almost&lt;/a&gt; a year ago. &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;( * executes clannish, self/Metafilter congratulatory victory jig * )&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;.  Will the mainstream press pick up the trail of the story, to the US government secret importation of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/22196#400836&quot;&gt;Nazi scientists&lt;/a&gt; immediately after WW2? (don&apos;t hold yr. breath)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29036</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2003 18:00:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GeorgeHBush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>germany</category>
		<category>Godwin</category>
		<category>Hitler</category>
		<category>Nazis</category>
		<category>PrescottBush</category>
		<category>PresidentBush</category>
		<category>Thyssen</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WW2</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>September 11th And The Bush Administration</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28055/September%2D11th%2DAnd%2DThe%2DBush%2DAdministration</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4582.htm"&gt;&amp;#0171;Clearly, one of the most critical questions&lt;/a&gt; of the twenty-first century concerns why the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 were not prevented. As I outline below, there are numerous aspects regarding the official stories about September 11th which do not fit with known facts, which contradict each other, which defy common sense, and which indicate a pattern of misinformation and coverup. The reports coming out of Washington do very little to alleviate these concerns.&amp;#0187; 

22 questions to chose from and decide which ones are nightmares of a conspiracy theorist and which ones must be answered.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28055</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2003 07:30:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>conspiracies</category>
		<category>newyork</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<category>wtc</category>
		<dc:creator>acrobat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Attack of the Gores.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27544/Attack%2Dof%2Dthe%2DGores</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.moveon.org/gore-speech.html"&gt;Al Gore calls the Bush administration on their lies, says he won&apos;t run but will pick a candidate in the near future.&lt;/a&gt; Insightful excerpt: &quot;Robust debate in a democracy will almost always involve occasional rhetorical excesses and leaps of faith, and we&apos;re all used to that. I&apos;ve even been guilty of it myself on occasion. But there is a big difference between that and a systematic effort to manipulate facts in service to a totalistic ideology that is felt to be more important than the mandates of basic honesty.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27544</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 02:17:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>americanpolitics</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I love you Mr. President!  Please desecrate my flag!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27253/I%2Dlove%2Dyou%2DMr%2DPresident%2DPlease%2Ddesecrate%2Dmy%2Dflag</link>
		<description> And thus, the new poster child for opposition to flag desecration amendments &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/030725/168/4s8z4.html&quot;&gt;was born&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wyethwire.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_wyethwire_archive.html#105915666121974904&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27253</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2003 10:09:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>flag</category>
		<category>flagburning</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Terror alert level goes orange</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23397/Terror%2Dalert%2Dlevel%2Dgoes%2Dorange</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/07/threat.level/index.html"&gt;Bush will &lt;a href=http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/07/threat.level/index.html&gt;raise the national terror threat level today from yellow to orange&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (CNN).  This means little to us here in NYC where we&apos;ve already been at orange.  (At least that&apos;s what I&apos;ve heard, although orange looks like a brownish color on my TV screen and a sort of muddy green on my computer monitor.) What, if anything, will your town, city, state, company, family do in response to this heightened threat level?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23397</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2003 08:54:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>publicsafety</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>terrorists</category>
		<category>threatalert</category>
		<category>WTC</category>
		<dc:creator>jellybuzz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A Republican&apos;s View of George Bush, Compassionate Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22670/A%2DRepublicans%2DView%2Dof%2DGeorge%2DBush%2DCompassionate%2DConservative</link>
		<description> It&apos;s thoughtful, not angry or insulting.  It appears to make sense and it doesn&apos;t upset me. Is this really how they think of themselves? Required reading for the liberal opposition: &lt;a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/05/opinion/05FRUM.html?pagewanted=all&amp;position=top&gt;A Republican&apos;s View of George Bush, Compassionate Conservative&lt;/a&gt;. (NYTimes, free registration required)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22670</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2003 12:51:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>compassionateconservative</category>
		<category>conservatism</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<dc:creator>alms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Whose Side Are You On, Mr. President?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22638/Whose%2DSide%2DAre%2DYou%2DOn%2DMr%2DPresident</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/printstory.hts/editorial/1722302"&gt;Whose Side Are You On, Mr. President?&lt;/a&gt; The former Dean of the White House press corps, Helen Thomas, asks the question. I didn&apos;t know there was any question about this matter.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22638</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2003 07:25:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>HelenThomas</category>
		<category>President</category>
		<category>Presidentbush</category>
		<category>WhiteHousePressCorps</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20674/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fpif.org/commentary/2002/0210unres.html"&gt;&quot;And due to the flagrant violations of U.N. resolutions, we now order Israel, Turkey, Morocco, and most every other country to bow before us...&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Otherwise known as &apos;things George Bush overlooked when planning his Cincinnati speech.&apos; Numerous UN resolutions have been disregarded and have gone unpunished-Israel being one of the most serious violators. Who else believes that their most hard-assed university professors would fail them for using the rather weak, subjective arguments that have been popping up in political speeches lately?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20674</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 17:24:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Cincinnati</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>Israel</category>
		<category>PresidentBush</category>
		<category>UN</category>
		<category>UnitedNations</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>tgrundke</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20403/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washtimes.com/national/20020927-500715.htm"&gt;Agency disavows report on Iraq arms&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The International Atomic Energy Agency says that a report cited by President Bush as evidence that Iraq in 1998 was &apos;six months away&apos; from developing a nuclear weapon does not exist. &apos;There&apos;s never been a report like that issued from this agency,&apos; Mark Gwozdecky, the IAEA&apos;s chief spokesman, said yesterday in a telephone interview from the agency&apos;s headquarters in Vienna, Austria.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20403</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:41:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>IAEA</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>nukes</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>WMDs</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19684/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27592-2002Sep2.html"&gt;Bush By The Numbers...&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Bush has spent a whopping total of 250 days of his presidency at Camp David (123 days), Kennebunkport (12) and his Texas ranch (115). That means Bush has spent 42 percent of his term so far at one of his three leisure destinations.&quot; More fun numbers about &quot;43&quot; in the story...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19684</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2002 00:40:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>campdavid</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>vacations</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18120/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=topnews&amp;amp;StoryID=1145724"&gt;Angered Bush to Give Speech on Corporate Reforms.&lt;/a&gt; Bush will devote his Saturday radio address to the subject of corporate responsibility and will travel to New York on July 9 to stress the need for better governing at the top level of American businesses.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18120</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2002 10:02:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>CEOs</category>
		<category>corporatereform</category>
		<category>corporatewelfarebums</category>
		<category>Enron</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>PresidentBush</category>
		<category>scandals</category>
		<dc:creator>Ty Webb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14014/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020118-10.html"&gt;President Bush seems to think that abortion is unconstitutional.&lt;/a&gt; Does anyone smell hypocrisy here?  I would suggest that he examine the constitutionality of his own actions before throwing stones.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14014</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2002 01:55:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>usconstitution</category>
		<dc:creator>jack-o</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


