<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with QueenElizabethII</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/QueenElizabethII</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'QueenElizabethII' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:28:53 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:28:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>My government will achieve triangulation and synegry in its key competencies</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29921/My%2Dgovernment%2Dwill%2Dachieve%2Dtriangulation%2Dand%2Dsynegry%2Din%2Dits%2Dkey%2Dcompetencies</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2003/11/29/do2905.xml&amp;amp;sSheet=/portal/2003/11/29/ixportal.html"&gt;Was the Queen&apos;s Speech Too Political?&lt;/a&gt; The Queen&apos;s speech at the state opening of Parliament is entirely written by 10 Downing Street. But is it appropriate for Her Majesty to talk like a Blairite? (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page4897.asp&quot;&gt;Full text&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29921</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:28:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>NewLabor</category>
		<category>QueenElizabethII</category>
		<category>UKParliament</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13298/</link>
		<description> &lt;a title=&quot;Sorry, The Sun seem to have the only online picture.&quot; href=&quot;http://www.thesun.co.uk/picture/0,,2001590087,00.jpg&quot;&gt;The Queen&apos;s latest portrait&lt;/a&gt; was bound to cause controversy, what with the artist being &lt;a title=&quot;A small bio and some of his works if you are unfamiliar with the artist&quot; href=&quot;http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/freud/&quot;&gt;Lucien Freud&lt;/a&gt;. Today a photograph of it was plastered over the front pages of nearly every major newspaper. &lt;a title=&quot;The Sun, Murcoch&apos;s finest shouting piece&quot; href=&quot;http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2001590268_1,00.html&quot;&gt;The tabloid press&lt;/a&gt; are, as ever, &apos;up in arms&apos; about it. I rather like it, but the &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.news.yahoo.com/011221/80/cm8z4.html&quot;&gt;palace isn&apos;t commenting as yet.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13298</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 04:37:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>Freud</category>
		<category>LucienFreud</category>
		<category>painting</category>
		<category>paintings</category>
		<category>portaiture</category>
		<category>portraits</category>
		<category>QueenElizabeth</category>
		<category>QueenElizabeth2</category>
		<category>QueenElizabethII</category>
		<category>RoyalFamily</category>
		<category>royalty</category>
		<category>TheQueen</category>
		<dc:creator>davehat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13116/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_1707000/1707903.stm"&gt;Queen to issue spam.&lt;/a&gt;  Since 1932 the UK monarchy has &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/20001014222845/http://www.royal.gov.uk/today/duties.htm&quot;&gt;broadcast a christmas message&lt;/a&gt; (on TV since 1957). From next year, it may also be sent in &quot;shortened form&quot;, by SMS. Meanwhile SMS usage has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.totaltele.com/view.asp?articleID=46095&amp;Pub=TT&amp;categoryid=625&amp;kw=SMS+market&quot;&gt;increased more than double&lt;/a&gt; in the last year, and British companies are considering &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2693045,00.html&quot;&gt;banning unsolicited text messages&lt;/a&gt; to mobile phones. I&apos;ve never received an SMS spam, but I&apos;m not looking forward to it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13116</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 01:13:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Christmas</category>
		<category>message</category>
		<category>monarchy</category>
		<category>QueenElizabeth</category>
		<category>QueenElizabeth2</category>
		<category>QueenElizabethII</category>
		<category>SMS</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>textmessage</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>walrus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


