<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with RIAA and downloading</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/RIAA+downloading</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'RIAA' and 'downloading' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:01:25 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:01:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Illegal Download =/= Lost Sale</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78478/Illegal%2DDownload%2DLost%2DSale</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20090119-judge-17000-illegal-downloads-dont-equal-17000-lost-sales.html&quot;&gt;&quot;[A]lthough it is true that someone who copies a digital version of a sound recording has little incentive to purchase the recording through legitimate means, it does not necessarily follow that the downloader would have made a legitimate purchase if the recording had not been available for free,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; said US District court Judge James P. Jones, in response to the RIAA&apos;s request for restitution against the former admin of Elite Torrents, Daniel Dove, who has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2008/June/08-crm-574.html&quot;&gt;already been found guilty of conspiracy and felony copyright infringement&lt;/a&gt;. The RIAA&apos;s request for restitution claimed that each download was equal to a lost sale. Judge Jones disagreed, and in part of his &lt;a href=&quot;http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/usa_dove_081117OpinionOrder.pdf&quot;&gt;ruling&lt;/a&gt; stated:&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;It is a basic principle of economics that as price increases, demand decreases. Customers who download music and movies for free would not necessarily spend money to acquire the same product. I am skeptical that customers would pay $7.22 or $19 for something they got for free. Certainly 100% of the illegal downloads through Elite Torrents did not result in the loss of a sale, but both Lionsgate and RIAA estimate their losses based on this faulty assumption.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;File sharers should nonetheless be wary of &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/01/despite-riaa-lo.html&quot;&gt;opening the champagne just yet&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78478</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:01:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>downloading</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>riaa</category>
		<category>torrents</category>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Stole the Precious Thing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>RIAA sues computerless family for illegal music sharing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51297/RIAA%2Dsues%2Dcomputerless%2Dfamily%2Dfor%2Dillegal%2Dmusic%2Dsharing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.mywebpal.com/news_tool_v2.cfm?pnpid=728&amp;amp;show=archivedetails&amp;amp;ArchiveID=1180681&amp;amp;om=1"&gt;RIAA sues family&lt;/a&gt; for illegal music file sharing. Wouldn&apos;t be new or noteworthy &#8212; if the family &lt;em&gt;actually had a computer&lt;/em&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8612&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51297</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:45:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>downloading</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>riaa</category>
		<dc:creator>charmston</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>RIAA sues... (again)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30863/RIAA%2Dsues%2Dagain</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/21/technology/riaa_suits/index.htm?cnn=yes"&gt;RIAA sues... (again):&lt;/a&gt; The RIAA has just issued a new lawsuit against 532 more &quot;illegal filesharers&quot;

only this time, they&apos;re also using the &quot;john doe&quot; approach meaning that they dont have to have ascertain your name by strongarming ISPs, but by suing your IP address, they let the judicial system take care of that little detail.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30863</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:30:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>downloading</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>riaa</category>
		<dc:creator>sixtwenty3dc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>LAMP</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29201/LAMP</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://lamp.mit.edu/"&gt;LAMP&lt;/a&gt; is an on-demand music service offered to the MIT campus through its cable TV network. The NYTimes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/27/technology/27mit.html?ex=1067835600&amp;en=1d631b1b90adbb8f&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=GOOGLE&quot;&gt;mulls the copyright implications&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29201</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:47:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>downloading</category>
		<category>LAMP</category>
		<category>mit</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>riaa</category>
		<dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Told Ya!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22964/Told%2DYa</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;cid=575&amp;amp;u=/nm/20030121/wr_nm/tech_music_dc_3&amp;amp;printer=1"&gt;Verizon Must Reveal Internet Song Swapper&lt;/a&gt; In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/22838&quot;&gt;recent discussion&lt;/a&gt; of the Supreme Court&apos;s decision to protect the rights of the individual from the greed and sloth of the  many I warned that the RIAA and MPAA, comically inept though the media paints them, would soon have things their way. This link is to a news report about an important step in their fight for individual rights.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22964</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:18:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>downloading</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>MPAA</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>P2P</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<category>verizon</category>
		<dc:creator>BGM</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11626/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/22327.html"&gt;The RIAA is at it again,&lt;/a&gt; this time there are supposedly plans to DDoS people who are sharing &quot;illegal&quot; files. Via The Register and ZDnet.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11626</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 21:58:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bittorrent</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>DDOS</category>
		<category>downloading</category>
		<category>P2P</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<dc:creator>Maxor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5562/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_1142000/1142663.stm"&gt;Napster caves.&lt;/a&gt; So what is the best alternative for &lt;I&gt;dial-up&lt;/I&gt; connections?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5562</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:13:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>downloading</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<category>riaa</category>
		<dc:creator>aflakete</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1575/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.napster.com"&gt;Uhoh!  Leggo my napster!&lt;/a&gt; So I just tried to load up Napster, and it told me that my connection to the server was refused.  None of the people I&apos;ve talked to have been able to get on either.   Could this be the end of Napster?  Killed in the night while nobody was watching?  The site doesn&apos;t say anything, but grrrr, I want my pirated music!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1575</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2000 18:19:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>downloading</category>
		<category>downloads</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<category>riaa</category>
		<dc:creator>benbrown</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


