<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with RalphNader and georgebush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/RalphNader+georgebush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'RalphNader' and 'georgebush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:07:59 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:07:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>is Nedra Pickler the author?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36106/is%2DNedra%2DPickler%2Dthe%2Dauthor</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2004/10/07/tv_station_reports_t.html"&gt;No need to actually vote, folks: the Election result has already been written by the AP:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;At this hour, President Bush has won re-election as president by a 47 percent to 43 percent margin in the popular vote nationwide. Ralph Nader has 1 percent of the vote nationwide. That&apos;s with 51 percent of the precincts reporting.
&lt;/i&gt; (they say it&apos;s a test article, but who ever heard of an election results article being pre-written?)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36106</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:07:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>algore</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7187/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/23/politics/23LIVE.html"&gt;Unrepentant Nader&lt;/a&gt; Is Nader a Sancho Panza, the realist, or Don Quixote, the dreamer, when he says Bush policies toward environment help ignite attention to our needs and thus good to have?
Or is he just a guy who can&apos;t believe he might have been wrong?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7187</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2001 06:02:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000election</category>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6257/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=85000676"&gt;Nader editorial in the WSJ&lt;/a&gt; (with another guy). They were prolly watered down a lot and given that &quot;two cheers for the president&quot; sub-title, but Nader still seems remarkably sanguine about Bush&apos;s plans to rein in corporate welfare.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6257</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2001 14:40:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editorial</category>
		<category>essay</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>oped</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<category>wallstreetjournal</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3854/</link>
		<description> The true culprit behind the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/detail.cfm?link_ID=3811&quot;&gt;Bush/Gore billboard&lt;/a&gt; has been revealed. No, it&apos;s not Nader -- it&apos;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20001023/el/brf_gore_bush_billboard_2.html&quot;&gt;publicity-grubbing dot-com&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3854</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:29:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>algore</category>
		<category>dotcom</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3163/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.workingforchange.com/news/column_dsp.cfm?ItemId=6915"&gt;Maybe Dubya needs a pinch-hitter&lt;/a&gt;  to take his place opposite Gore at the debates planned by the Commission on Presidential Debates.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3163</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2000 13:08:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>debates</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<dc:creator>harmful</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2750/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.votenader.com/materials/WhyRalphIsRunning.html"&gt;Well here&apos;s why Ralph is running.&lt;/a&gt; Do the other guys have anything this succinct and clear-cut? I can&apos;t find on the &apos;Net any page, nor have I heard in any of their speeches, where Bush or Gore come straight out and state exactly why they&apos;re running.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2750</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2000 17:42:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>algore</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<dc:creator>ZachsMind</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


