<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Register</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Register</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Register' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:54:52 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:54:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Register that bicycle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37082/Register%2Dthat%2Dbicycle</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/newyork/nyc-bike1118,0,2976740.story?coll=ny-nynews-headlines"&gt;&lt;b&gt;No bicycling in NYC without a license?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; That&apos;s right, a new law -- apparently the first of its kind in the nation --  proposed this week by bike-bashing Bronx Councilwoman Madeline Provenzano, will carry serious fines and even jail sentences for violators who ride unregistered bicycles on city streets.  And yes, there will be a $25 per bike registration fee.  Way to encourage alternative transport in this crowded, congested, polluted town.  What next?  Licenses for rollerblades, skateboards, wheelchairs?  How about my &lt;i&gt;running shoes&lt;/i&gt; -- during peak traffic they&apos;re faster and more hazardous to fellow city dwellers than my beat up old Trek, any day.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37082</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:54:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>axegrindfilter</category>
		<category>bicycle</category>
		<category>brox</category>
		<category>city</category>
		<category>fines</category>
		<category>jail</category>
		<category>license</category>
		<category>madelineprovenzano</category>
		<category>newyork</category>
		<category>nyc</category>
		<category>provenzano</category>
		<category>register</category>
		<category>registration</category>
		<category>sarcasm</category>
		<category>transportation</category>
		<category>violators</category>
		<dc:creator>jellybuzz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The New Kids Domain</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27926/The%2DNew%2DKids%2DDomain</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.kids.us/"&gt;kids.us ready to go.&lt;/a&gt; Hidden amongst the seemingly endless barrage of SOBig virii this morning was an interesting email from that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.resourceshelf.com &quot;&gt;ResourceShelf Guy&lt;/a&gt; on the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kids.us/&quot;&gt;kids Domain&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br&gt;Being billed as &lt;i&gt;&quot;an Internet domain that parents and children can trust for educational and appropriate online fun&lt;/i&gt;&quot; kids.us Launches On September 4, 2003. You can read the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kids.us/policy_overview_files/frame.htm&quot;&gt;Overview of kids.us Policies and Procedures&lt;/a&gt;, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kids.us/buy.html&quot;&gt;Register A Name&lt;/a&gt; (starting next week).
&lt;br&gt;Interestingly they &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kids.us/press/dotkids_pr_05.20.03.pdf&quot;&gt;Say&lt;/a&gt; a company called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cyveillance.com&quot;&gt;cyveillance&lt;/a&gt; will be &quot;monitoring and reviewing&quot; content for the domains.
&lt;br&gt;The domain names will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kids.us/faqs.html#format&quot;&gt;Look&lt;/a&gt; a little funny, but maybe &lt;a href=&quot;http://a.wholelottanothing.org/&quot;&gt;Someone&lt;/a&gt; should snag www.metafilter.kids.us, you know, for the kids. They don&apos;t seem cheap, as &lt;i&gt;&quot;Registrants will be charged a combined registration fee and a non-refundable application fee for five-year registration. &lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27926</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 04:36:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>domain</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>kids</category>
		<category>register</category>
		<category>registry</category>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>take your business elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25057/take%2Dyour%2Dbusiness%2Delsewhere</link>
		<description> Last week some friends of mine launched terroristidkit.com to, as they put it, &quot;[poke] fun at the racial profiling, loss of civil
liberties and terrorist paranoia that is sweeping the US.&quot; Five days later &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.terroridkit.com/censored/&quot;&gt;Register.com seized their domain and refuses to explain why&lt;/a&gt;, despite the fact that they complied with two requests for identity verification and even called Register.com to talk about it; after putting them on hold for twenty minutes, Register.com put the phone down. Today the domain is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.register.com/whois-results.cgi?4760eb844623d327f4548e24ffcccbfd7b2a715d4fa28d8926c8aed415d44f39731a17b78bdda6873ba2cc02140a22a77d20e012bc6c61d8&quot;&gt;now owned by Register.com&lt;/a&gt;. What the hell is going on?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25057</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:28:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>racialprofiling</category>
		<category>register</category>
		<category>terroristidkit</category>
		<category>terroristparanoia</category>
		<dc:creator>lia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13536/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://ml.register.com"&gt;Register International Domain Names&lt;/a&gt; such as &quot;http://www.n&#xeb;rd.com&quot;, which is actually available.  (Note the umlaut on the e.)  If you&apos;ve been looking for an interesting domain name, only to find that they&apos;ve all been registered, this may be just the ticket.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13536</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2002 08:10:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>internationaldomains</category>
		<category>register</category>
		<dc:creator>fnirt</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7100/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/18341.html"&gt;From The Register,&lt;/a&gt; it looks like the UK has implemented an internet police force.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7100</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:02:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cybercops</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>jackstraw</category>
		<category>register</category>
		<dc:creator>paladin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6268/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/17433.html"&gt;Can &quot;blocking software&quot; companies be sued?&lt;/a&gt; This is interesting. &lt;i&gt;The Register&lt;/i&gt; (a respected if somewhat snide computer industry online rag) has somehow managed to land on Cyber Patrol&apos;s block list as a &quot;sex site&quot;. Now they&apos;re conducting something called an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.org.uk&quot;&gt;ABCe audit&lt;/a&gt; and they&apos;re making nasty noises about &quot;restraint of trade&quot;. Which makes me wonder if they&apos;re thinking &quot;lawsuit&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The blocking-software companies have been using rather broad brushes in making their blocking lists. Although some claim that any site they block is checked by a human first, with thousands of new sites appearing every day there simply isn&apos;t any way. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peacefire.org&quot;&gt;Peacefire&lt;/a&gt; has documented hundreds of sites which were blocked inappropriately. I am pretty certain that under US law that blockees have no recourse -- but perhaps the law in the EU is different. Anyone over there care to comment? Is it plausible that an &quot;ABCe audit&quot; could result in a lawsuit? (I&apos;d really &lt;i&gt;love&lt;/i&gt; to see a few high profile big-bucks lawsuits here.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6268</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2001 07:53:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cyberpatrol</category>
		<category>filtering</category>
		<category>filters</category>
		<category>register</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3482/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://staples.register.com/"&gt;Register.com and Staples are offering $1 domains&lt;/a&gt; for a limited time. What&apos;s the catch?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3482</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2000 21:30:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Register</category>
		<category>registration</category>
		<category>Staples</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/234/</link>
		<description> I noticed today that &lt;a href=&apos;http://zipper.com/domains.html&apos;&gt;zipper.com&apos;s available domain name list&lt;/a&gt; isn&apos;t working as well as it used to. Now that &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.register.com&apos;&gt;Register.com&lt;/a&gt; is a registrar, the zipper dictionary database isn&apos;t picking up names registered at Register.com. I also noticed that anything remotely cool or useful on the zipper list has already been bought by domain speculators (squatters).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.234</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:35:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>register</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<category>zipper</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


