<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Roe</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Roe</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Roe' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:21:48 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:21:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Then and Now</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58764/Then%2Dand%2DNow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nrlc.org/news/1999/NRL999/mccain.html"&gt;McCain: I would not support repeal of Roe vs. Wade,&lt;/a&gt; Back then our hero said keep abortiion rights.  Now, though, with the gift of a more mature perspective (and a hankering for power), he says: &lt;a href=&quot;http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MCCAIN_2008?SITE=7219&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2007-02-18-20-23-58&quot;&gt;McCain: Roe V. Wade Should Be Overturned&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58764</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:21:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>McCaine</category>
		<category>roe</category>
		<category>versus</category>
		<category>wade</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Culture of Profit</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48505/Culture%2Dof%2DProfit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/012306Q.shtml"&gt;&quot;Culture of life&quot; vs. Culture of Profit ?&lt;/a&gt; Today, by phone, George W. Bush addressed the anti - &lt;i&gt;Roe v. Wade&lt;/i&gt; protestors gathered at the Washington D.C. mall : in support of the crowd gathered in expectation that Samuel Alito - if nominated - would vote to overturn &lt;i&gt;Roe&lt;/i&gt;.  

Meanwhile, Mr. Bush&apos;s administration is proposing EPA rules that would allow testing of pesticides on pregnant women and children. How very curious.

&lt;/userdefined&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48505</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:18:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>pesticidesprofitBush</category>
		<category>Roe</category>
		<category>v.</category>
		<category>Wade</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>...respecting and defending the life and dignity of every human being...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48469/respecting%2Dand%2Ddefending%2Dthe%2Dlife%2Dand%2Ddignity%2Dof%2Devery%2Dhuman%2Dbeing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Roe/"&gt;Roe v. Wade,&lt;/a&gt; 33 years old today. With abortion back in the news due to the Supreme Court nomination of Alito, will the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/01/08/MNGHGGK8O81.DTL&quot;&gt;Ideological Rumble&lt;/a&gt; over the issue ever be settled or are we doomed to see questionable declarations like today&apos;s recognition of  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/01/20060120-5.html&quot;&gt;&quot;National Sanctity of Human Life Day, 2006&quot;&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;i&gt;...creating a society where every life has meaning...&lt;/i&gt;-- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/1/22/175228/539&quot;&gt;every life? Really?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48469</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:47:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>choice</category>
		<category>Court</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>life</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>Roe</category>
		<category>Wade</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Alito&apos;s Roe v. Wade comments</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47810/Alitos%2DRoe%2Dv%2DWade%2Dcomments</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/23/alito.ap/index.html"&gt;NewsFilter: Supreme Court nominee Alito advocated overturning Roe v. Wade in 1985 DOJ Memo.&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archives.gov/&quot;&gt;National Archives&lt;/a&gt; have just released a new collection of records pertaining to Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archives.gov/news/samuel-alito/accession-060-89-1/Acc060-89-1-box18-SG-AbortionsAlt-1985.pdf&quot;&gt;One document in particular (pdf)&lt;/a&gt; will likely draw considerable fire during his nomination hearings.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47810</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:22:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>alito</category>
		<category>roe</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>wade</category>
		<dc:creator>justkevin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Attention Deficit</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45348/Attention%2DDeficit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://mainstreambaptist.blogspot.com/2005/09/repealing-one-civil-right-at-time.html#comments"&gt;The death of Roe v. Wade from a thousand cuts&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;Two weeks ago Paul Pressler, the architect of the fundamentalist takeover of the Southern Baptist Convention, described how the Religious Right intended to deal with Roe v. Wade. After expressing his elation with the selection of John Roberts as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court he said, &quot;Roe v. Wade won&apos;t be revoked, it will die the death of a thousand cuts and qualifications and regulations until it gradually disappears.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 - Dr. Bruce Prescott, from the eyewall of America&apos;s religious wars  (Executive Director of &quot;Mainstream Oklahoma Baptists&quot;), &lt;a href=&quot;http://mainstreambaptist.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;notes&lt;/a&gt;  the culmination of long-laid plans.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45348</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 20:21:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>baptists</category>
		<category>prolife</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>religiousright</category>
		<category>reproductiverights</category>
		<category>roe</category>
		<category>roevwade</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Thou shalt not bear false witness...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43606/Thou%2Dshalt%2Dnot%2Dbear%2Dfalse%2Dwitness</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.republicandictionary.com/"&gt;Republican to Evangelical to English via Babylonfish.&lt;/a&gt; What &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/07/20050719-7.html&quot;&gt;Bush said &lt;/a&gt;about Supreme Court nominee &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103850/&quot;&gt;&lt;strike&gt;Bob Roberts&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://judgeroberts.com/&quot;&gt; John Roberts&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;In my meetings with Judge Roberts, I have been deeply impressed. He&apos;s a man of extraordinary accomplishment and ability. He has a good heart. He has the qualities Americans expect in a judge: experience, wisdom, fairness, and civility. He has profound respect for the rule of law and for the liberties guaranteed to every citizen. He will strictly apply the Constitution and laws, not legislate from the bench....He&apos;s also a man of character who loves his country and his family.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;What it meant to conservative fundamentalist Christians (&lt;em&gt;in comments&lt;/em&gt;):  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43606</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:55:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>Christian</category>
		<category>Church</category>
		<category>Divider</category>
		<category>Evangelicals</category>
		<category>Federalism</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>Roberts</category>
		<category>Roe</category>
		<category>State</category>
		<category>symbolism</category>
		<category>Uniter</category>
		<dc:creator>rzklkng</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An Abortion Clinic Nightmare or An Activism Boon?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23890/An%2DAbortion%2DClinic%2DNightmare%2Dor%2DAn%2DActivism%2DBoon</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2801839.stm&quot;&gt;A Supreme Court ruling with interesting implications&lt;/a&gt;:  All lower court racketeering convictions against pro-life protestors have been effectively overturned.  Operation Rescue is quite free to harass patients and blockade clinics again.  Is this a major dent in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saveroe.com/&quot;&gt;campaign to save &lt;i&gt;Roe vs. Wade&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;?  Or does this open up new possibilities for activists of all stripes?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23890</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:59:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>activism</category>
		<category>activist</category>
		<category>blockade</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>clinic</category>
		<category>conviction</category>
		<category>nightmare</category>
		<category>operationrescue</category>
		<category>patients</category>
		<category>prolife</category>
		<category>racketeering</category>
		<category>roe</category>
		<category>roevwade</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>wade</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14583/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://pewforum.org/deathpenalty/resources/transcript3.php3"&gt;Scalia: Think the dealth penalty wrong? Resign&lt;/a&gt; In particular, he says, any Catholic jurist who agrees with the Vatican&apos;s anti-death penalty stance should resign. One to raise an eyebrow over, given that Scalia - a jurist who just happens to be Catholic - has been a consistent foe of &lt;i&gt;Roe v. Wade &lt;/i&gt; and legalized abortion. He says his opposition to &lt;i&gt;Roe&lt;/i&gt;, however, is mainly legal, and adds that his religious views should play no role in his decisions.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14583</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2002 20:31:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Abortion</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>DeathPenalty</category>
		<category>Roe</category>
		<category>RoeVWade</category>
		<category>Scalia</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>Vatican</category>
		<category>Wade</category>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


