<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Rumsfeld and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Rumsfeld+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Rumsfeld' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 15:05:00 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 15:05:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Not SO Willing And The Not So Able Plus Postwar Window Closing in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27091/The%2DNot%2DSO%2DWilling%2DAnd%2DThe%2DNot%2DSo%2DAble%2DPlus%2DPostwar%2DWindow%2DClosing%2Din%2DIraq</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://publicbroadcasting.net/wnyc/news.newsmain?action=printarticle&amp;ARTICLE_ID=523426&quot; title=&quot;On March 1, Turkey upended Washington&apos;s battle plan by denying the use of Turkish land as a staging area for a northern front. That allowed an escape route for Hussein sympathizers to their traditional strongholds north of Baghdad, where the resistance since the war has been the worst. And on March 5, France, Russia and Germany pledged to oppose a U.N. resolution supporting the war, thwarting the administration&apos;s diplomatic plans. Until then, U.S. strategy was still based on winning U.N. endorsement to act against Iraq -- so the international community would play a larger role both during and after the war. Only days before the assault began, the United States realized it would have only a handful of allies to help it run postwar Iraq.&quot;&gt;Preparing for War, Stumbling to Peace&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;The Bush administration planned well and won the war with minimal allied casualties. Now, according to interviews with dozens of administration officials, military leaders and independent analysts, missteps in the planning for the subsequent peace could threaten the lives of soldiers and drain U.S. resources indefinitely and cloud the victory itself.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/18/international/18CND-GORDON.html?ex=1059192000&amp;en=4596e1cf9e7c2aee&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=GOOGLE&quot; title=&quot;When the administration decided to invade Iraq to remove the Saddam Hussein regime, it adopted a new approach toward coalition-building. The administration wanted a free hand in determining when to go to war, what the plan of attack should be and what political process should be put in place in Iraq afterward to ensure that a new government was both democratic and friendly to the United States... Rather, the current Bush administration would call the shots, and like-minded nations -- the so-called coalition of the able and the willing -- could join in. That approach had the advantage of providing the United States with the maximum flexibility in overseeing the war. But the failure to build broad international backing for the effort also meant that there were relatively few allied forces to help shoulder the military and financial burdens of enforcing the peace. There is a long list of nations that may send forces, but many of the promised foreign deployments are small and largely symbolic. Now that the United States is involved in a messy occupation in Iraq, it has discovered that it is lonely at the top.&quot;&gt;Lonely At The Top&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said last week that he hoped to enlist as many as 30,000 troops from 49 nations. The problem, however, is that many of the recruits the Pentagon has tried to line up so far appear to fall into two categories: the not so willing and the not that able.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://reuters.com/printerFriendlyPopup.jhtml?type=topNews&amp;storyID=3105268&quot; title=&quot;About 146,000 U.S. troops are serving in postwar Iraq amid mounting security threats. The U.S. death toll of 147 combat deaths has now equaled the number killed in the 1991 Gulf War. National Guard soldiers would likely not be deployed until March or April after they complete two or three months of training, the paper said. Their lengths of service could last 12 to 16 months each including training.&quot;&gt;Report: U.S. May Call National Guard for Iraq Duty&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;The Pentagon could start a call-up of as many as 10,000 U.S. National Guard soldiers by this winter to bolster forces in Iraq and offset a lack of troops from allies, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8445-2003Jul17.html?nav=hptop_ts&amp;nav=hptop_ts&quot; title=&quot;While measured in tone and focused on 32 recommendations for rapidly improving conditions in Iraq, the report represents, in many respects, a critical assessment of the Bush administration&apos;s postwar plan. It implicitly faulted the administration for failing to adequately involve the international community and the United Nations in reconstruction activities. &apos;&apos;The scope of the challenges, the financial requirements, and rising anti-Americanism in parts of Iraq argue for a new coalition that includes countries and organizations beyond the original war fighting coalition,&apos;&apos; the report said. The report also noted that the administration, by vesting virtually all reconstruction authority in the Pentagon, chose a new model for postwar management that cut out many agencies more experienced in the field and relied on the Defense Department&apos;s &apos;&apos;relatively untested capacities.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;Postwar Window Closing in Iraq, Study Says&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;A team of outside experts dispatched by the Pentagon to assess security and reconstruction operations in Iraq reported yesterday that the window of opportunity for achieving postwar success is closing and requires immediate and dramatic action by U.S. military and civilian personnel.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.well.com/user/eob/poetry/The_Second_Coming.html&quot; title=&quot;Turning and turning in the widening gyre The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all convictions, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. &quot;&gt;Turning and turning in the widening gyre...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27091</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 15:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>nationalguard</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>for Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26081/for%2DFreedom</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&amp;amp;c=StoryFT&amp;amp;cid=1051390432932&amp;amp;p=1012571727088"&gt;Regime Change Bonanza.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenselink.mil/&quot;&gt;Donald&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.janes.com/&quot;&gt;Rumsfeld&lt;/a&gt; is pushing for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freemedia.at/bitter.htm&quot;&gt;Iran&lt;/a&gt; to be the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iranian.com/AhmadSadri/2002/December/Reform/&quot;&gt;next&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/shirz2.htm&quot;&gt;to&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm&quot;&gt;fall&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26081</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 08:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iran</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>The Jesse Helms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>War Profiteering -- Ordained by Providence?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25482/War%2DProfiteering%2DOrdained%2Dby%2DProvidence</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fortune.com/fortune/articles/0,15114,447429,00.html"&gt;Former N. Korean Nuclear Contractors are&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;pretty sure that at some point Don was involved,&quot; since it was not unusual to seek help from board members &quot;when we needed contacts with the U.S. government.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;  An article in yesterday&apos;s &lt;i&gt;Fortune&lt;/i&gt; mentions and quotes a number of former employees/contractors for a Swiss engineering firm -- headed by &lt;b&gt;Donald Rumsfeld &lt;/b&gt;at the time that Pyongyang began getting its nuke on.  Nevertheless, 

&lt;i&gt;Today Rumsfeld, riding high after the Iraq war, is reportedly discussing a plan for &quot;regime change&quot; in North Korea. But his silence about the nuclear reactors raises questions about what he did--or didn&apos;t do--as an ABB director.&lt;/i&gt;  unsurprisingly,

the media is &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;q=rumsfeld+north+korea+abb&quot;&gt;not exactly &lt;/a&gt;all over this.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25482</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:40:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ABB</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>korea</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>pyongyang</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Reporters vs. Bush administration vs. Saddam&apos;s regime</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24680/Reporters%2Dvs%2DBush%2Dadministration%2Dvs%2DSaddams%2Dregime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/892201.asp?0cv=CA01"&gt;&quot;Journalists&quot; vs. The White House&lt;/a&gt; - MSNBC&apos;s Tom Curry reports on the Bush administration&apos;s frustration with the war coverage. Rumsfeld: &#8220;Fortunately... the American people have a very good center of gravity and can absorb and balance what they see and hear.&#8221;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24680</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 20:23:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<dc:creator>cinematique</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rumsfeld&apos;s comment</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22967/Rumsfelds%2Dcomment</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://start.earthlink.net/newsarticle?cat=6&amp;amp;aid=D7OMUU8G0_story"&gt;Rumsfeld&apos;s comment&lt;/a&gt; about the draft has caused a stir.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/news/politics/200301/PEN20030117a.shtml&quot;&gt;The Hispanic Caucus&lt;/a&gt; is upset and they&apos;re the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/01/21/national1952EST0768.DTL&quot;&gt;major minority &lt;/a&gt;(an oxymoron?).  It has also riled the feathers of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usnewswire.com/topnews/qtr1_2003/0115-116.html&quot;&gt;Vietnam Veterans of America&lt;/a&gt;.  If you Google &quot;Rumsfeld draft&quot; there are the two links above but the only article in a major newspaper is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moscowtimes.ru/stories/2003/01/17/120.html&quot;&gt;The Moscow Times. &lt;/a&gt;   Rumsfeld called his statement at a Pentagon press conference &quot;not eloquently spoken&quot;.  Is this a big story?  Talk amongst yourselves.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22967</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 22:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>draft</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>whatever</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11220/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/secdef_bio.html"&gt;Donald Rumsfeld&lt;/a&gt; from Dep of Defense  biography ....&quot;Mr. Rumsfeld served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of General Instrument Corporation from 1990 to 1993. A leader in broadband transmission, distribution, and access control technologies for cable, satellite and terrestrial broadcasting applications, the company pioneered the development of the first all-digital high definition television (HDTV) technology&quot;.

...boy that must feel like 100 years ago....  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11220</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2001 10:29:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biographary</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>secretaryofdefense</category>
		<dc:creator>Voyageman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


