2 posts tagged with SOciety by troll.
Displaying 1 through 2 of 2.

Related tags:
+ (68)
+ (25)
+ (19)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (14)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (10)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (4)
+ (4)


Users that often use this tag:
reenum (18)
zarq (13)
amberglow (13)
kliuless (11)
Gyan (7)
acb (5)
MiguelCardoso (5)
infini (4)
daksya (4)
Tlogmer (4)
Artw (3)
stbalbach (3)
mr_crash_davis (3)
homunculus (3)
tellurian (3)
modernnomad (3)
Blazecock Pileon (3)
The Whelk (3)
troll (2)
bayani (2)
vidur (2)
- (2)
amyms (2)
blasdelf (2)
MetaMonkey (2)
divabat (2)
Benny Andajetz (2)
wilful (2)
moonbird (2)
plexi (2)
hama7 (2)
five fresh fish (2)
y2karl (2)
crunchland (2)
nickyskye (2)
netbros (2)
In 1989, The Columbia University Seminars on Media and Society (later called the 'Fred Friendly Seminars') produced a ten-part series entitled Ethics in America, hosted by Fred W. Friendly [obit]. The show, which aired on PBS, featured prominent American thinkers of the time -- including psychologists, philosophers, doctors, lawyers, theologians, professors, business leaders, district attorneys, politicians, journalists, and a supreme court justice -- engaged in round-table debate concerning hypothetical ethical dilemmas. It was reprised in 2007 as Ethics in America II. Both incarnations [I; II] are viewable for free at Lerner.org, which describes the original version thus: This series uses the Socratic method to build analytical skills and examine ethical questions. The programs aim to sharpen moral reasoning without favoring a particular position by exploring ethical dilemmas in legal, political, medical, corporate, and military arenas. Panelists include Antonin Scalia, Faye Wattleton, and Peter Jennings. [more inside]
posted by troll on Sep 7, 2011 - 15 comments

Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities: We show how the prevailing majority opinion in a population can be rapidly reversed by a small fraction p of randomly distributed committed agents who consistently proselytize the opposing opinion and are immune to influence. Specifically, we show that when the committed fraction grows beyond a critical value pc ≈ 10%, there is a dramatic decrease in the time, Tc, taken for the entire population to adopt the committed opinion. [.pdf] [more inside]
posted by troll on Jul 26, 2011 - 56 comments

Page: 1