<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Salon and election</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Salon+election</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Salon' and 'election' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:03:56 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:03:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The best PR ends up looking like news. You never know when a PR agency</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30706/The%2Dbest%2DPR%2Dends%2Dup%2Dlooking%2Dlike%2Dnews%2DYou%2Dnever%2Dknow%2Dwhen%2Da%2DPR%2Dagency</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/01/13/dean_media/"&gt;&quot;The Media vs. Howard Dean.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Salon (subscription or Flash ad viewing required) observes that the media have been doing everything in their power to attach negative labels to US presidential candidate Howard Dean. Will the adage that &quot;there&apos;s no such thing as bad publicity&quot; prevail? Meanwhile, the Internet is increasing in relevance as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ap/20040111/ap_on_el_pr/media_politics&quot;&gt;news source&lt;/a&gt;, according to a recent survey. Which websites do you peruse for political coverage, if any?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30706</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:03:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>HowardDean</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>publicity</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Eloquence</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6315/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.crummy.com/articles/purple/"&gt;Red v. Blue v. . . . Purple?&lt;/a&gt; Was America really so divided in the 2000 election? A map created as a retort to Salon&apos;s &quot;Red v. Blue&quot; map tells the real story. Any and all Prince references/jokes permitted.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6315</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:48:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>map</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4318/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/11/16/ballots/print.html"&gt;More nonsense&lt;/a&gt;  from everyone&apos;s favorite biased &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.salon.com/&quot;&gt;website&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;They screw up their own point of course:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;I&gt;&quot;The surge of presidential candidates in the wake of Revision 11 had little impact on counties that use more sophisticated voting procedures and don&apos;t have to worry about crowded ballot space.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The problem is with the outdated voting procedures, not with third parties.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4318</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:17:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>2000election</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<dc:creator>Mr. skullhead</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4017/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/11/03/gays/index.html"&gt;Bob Jones 2?&lt;/a&gt; Mr. &lt;a href=&quot;http://metafilter.com/detail.cfm?link_ID=4015&quot;&gt;DUI&lt;/a&gt; makes another misstep. Regardless of the outcome, the past 24 hours have been satisfying for Democrats  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4017</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2000 23:05:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>antigay</category>
		<category>bigotry</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>CornerstoneUniversity</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>homophobia</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>Michigan</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<category>school</category>
		<category>university</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3555/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/10/04/nader/index.html"&gt;More Hot Nader Action Coming At You.&lt;/a&gt; Because you cannot post enough links about Ralph Nader on Metafilter.  The curious thing about this article comes at the end, with the analysis of Nader&apos;s message.  Yeah, Ralph&apos;s against a lot of stuff, but what is he &lt;i&gt;for&lt;/i&gt;?  What are his plans and agendas?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3555</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2000 07:58:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>Salon</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>solistrato</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3165/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/09/07/debates/index.html"&gt;Yo dawg, peep Bush, he be up and on that whitecrib thang.&lt;/a&gt; Believe it Yo.  My pager goin off when I saw this word scribble...&lt;p&gt;Bush (shaking his head mournfully): &quot;Dude, dude. You must be loaded, Holmes. You&apos;re cut off on the bong, ace. Your lameness is of a sameness. If every time you&apos;re sippin&apos; on a 40 you start quoting Grouchy Marx, my man, you can&apos;t be hanging at Epsilon House. Major league bummer!&quot;&lt;p&gt;True.  True.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3165</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2000 21:30:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Salon</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Brilliantcrank</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2318/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://salon.com/politics/feature/2000/06/28/perot/index.html"&gt;Oh, happy day!&lt;/a&gt; Just when thought the 2000 US Presidential Race was going to be a woebegone contest between &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.algore2000.com/&quot;&gt;Dull&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.georgebush.com/&quot;&gt;Duller&lt;/a&gt;, the impish whackjob returns for yet another round of merry hi-jinks and paranoiac delusions presented as fact!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2318</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:29:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>presidential</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<dc:creator>m.polo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


