<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with SanFranciscoChronicle</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/SanFranciscoChronicle</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'SanFranciscoChronicle' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 20:30:08 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 20:30:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>God Save Us Nelly Queens</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37869/God%2DSave%2DUs%2DNelly%2DQueens</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/12/15/MNGUMAC6LN1.DTL"&gt;Now that we may be renaming&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dot.ca.gov/baybridge/MainSpanReportDraftDec10.1230.pdf&quot;&gt;rebuilt eastern span&lt;/a&gt; [pdf] of the San Francisco - Oakland Bay Bridge after &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfmuseum.org/hist1/norton.html&quot;&gt;19th century character&lt;/a&gt; (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/17732&quot;&gt;sometime MeFi topic&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_A._Norton&quot;&gt;Emperor Norton I&lt;/a&gt;, the question remains: when the time comes, what shall we name after his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/sarria_j.html&quot;&gt;devoted&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.qx.net/jeff/gaylex/jose.htm&quot;&gt;widow&lt;/a&gt;? [&lt;a href=&quot;http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:b33SdbxH0U0J:www.qx.net/jeff/gaylex/jose.htm+widow+norton&amp;hl=en&quot;&gt;cached last link&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37869</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 20:30:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BayBridge</category>
		<category>Court</category>
		<category>drag</category>
		<category>EmperorNorton</category>
		<category>EmperorNortonI</category>
		<category>EmpressNorton</category>
		<category>JoseSarria</category>
		<category>SanFranciscoChronicle</category>
		<category>SFGate</category>
		<category>TheWidowNorton</category>
		<category>WidowNorton</category>
		<dc:creator>expialidocious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>SF Police Indictments, Civic Duty and Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23965/SF%2DPolice%2DIndictments%2DCivic%2DDuty%2Dand%2DJustice</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/03/01/MN67000.DTL&quot;&gt;&quot;I&apos;m the commander in chief of this goddam place, and there is no way the command staff of my Police Department is going to step down at this time.  It&apos;s a matter of public safety.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

So responded San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/03/01/MN190103.DTL&quot;&gt;indictments of ten SFPD members&lt;/a&gt;, which included Police Chief Earl Sanders.  The convictions were passed after police officers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/news/default.jsp?story=n.brawl.1205w&quot;&gt;assaulted two men who wouldn&apos;t hand over a bag of steak fajitas&lt;/a&gt;.  Top brass &lt;a href=&quot;http://beta.kpix.com/news/local/2002/11/28/Alleged_Assault_Involving_Three_Off-Duty_SFPD_Officers_Generates_Controversy.html&quot;&gt;deliberately delayed handing over records to the DA&lt;/a&gt;.  Has Brown committed political suicide standing by an old friend?  Are his words a realistic portrayal of municipal operations?  And what does an indicted command staff still on the job say about justice being served?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23965</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2003 10:19:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>EarlSanders</category>
		<category>fajitas</category>
		<category>Mayor</category>
		<category>police</category>
		<category>SanFrancisco</category>
		<category>SanFranciscoChronicle</category>
		<category>SFGate</category>
		<category>SFPD</category>
		<category>suspension</category>
		<category>WillieBrown</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15503/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2002/03/13/ED89693.DTL"&gt;Are people demonizing Islam to gain publicity?&lt;/a&gt; In an op-ed article in yesterday&apos;s San Francisco Chronicle, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asmahasan.com/aboutTheAuthorFlash.html&quot;&gt;Asma Hasan&lt;/a&gt; wrote that post 9/11, &apos;hating&apos; Islam is getting &apos;intellectualized&apos;. She wrote that those who are framing the debate in &apos;clash of civilization&apos; terms are doing it mainly to gain publicity (or because they dont know better). Her ire was directed more towards Sullivan and Rushdie whose voices as she rightly pointed out carry greater weight than that of people like Buchanan or Graham. &lt;br&gt;
I do see a lot more stuff on the the &apos;clash of civilization&apos; theme now than I have seen before sept 11. Is it because people think and speak a lot more on this subject now and this is what they actually believe or has the subject been getting sensationalized over the last few months?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15503</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 02:02:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>andrewsullivan</category>
		<category>asmahasan</category>
		<category>buchanan</category>
		<category>graham</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>muslims</category>
		<category>salmanrushdie</category>
		<category>sanfranciscochronicle</category>
		<dc:creator>justlooking</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13600/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/01/06/MN107464.DTL"&gt;SF Chronicle article&lt;/a&gt; about a condition that I have seen but didn&apos;t know had a name. . . .&lt;a href=http://www.orthorexia.com&gt;Orthorexia Nervosa&lt;/a&gt;. . .The &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;obsessive quest for healty food&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;. . .I would suspect that your average computer-active person would NOT experience this condition but perhaps you know someone or perhaps live with someone who could be described in this way. . .  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13600</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2002 15:01:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>diet</category>
		<category>eating</category>
		<category>food</category>
		<category>HealthFood</category>
		<category>obsession</category>
		<category>orthoexia</category>
		<category>orthorexic</category>
		<category>RawFood</category>
		<category>SanFranciscoChronicle</category>
		<category>SFGate</category>
		<category>vegan</category>
		<category>VeganTaliban</category>
		<dc:creator>Danf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7643/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/05/12/BU239079.DTL"&gt;Apparently  arrogance isn&apos;t a job qualification&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;ve read some attacks on dot-commers for being self involved yahoos. So the Chron found someone willing to own up to being a self involved yahoo in print. It&apos;s painful to read.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7643</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2001 10:02:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arrogance</category>
		<category>arrogant</category>
		<category>dotcom</category>
		<category>sanfranciscochronicle</category>
		<category>selfinvolved</category>
		<category>sfgate</category>
		<dc:creator>rdr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


