<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Spam and Politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Spam+Politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Spam' and 'Politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:16:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:16:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Ron Paul Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66234/Ron%2DPaul%2DSpam</link>
		<description> When &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salberg.org/2007/10/29/ron-paul-using-spam-emails-to-get-out-message/&quot;&gt;Ron Paul email spam&lt;/a&gt; started hitting inboxes in late October, &lt;a href=&quot;http://main.uab.edu/show.asp?durki=114955&quot;&gt;UAB Computer Forensics&lt;/a&gt; Directory Gary Warner published findings on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://garwarner.blogspot.com/2007/10/first-2008-campaign-spamming-virus.html&quot;&gt;spam&apos;s textual patterns&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://garwarner.blogspot.com/2007/11/ron-paul-spam-and-online-support.html&quot;&gt;illicit botnet used to spread it&lt;/a&gt; -- findings which were picked up by media outlets and tech websites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2007/10/31/ron_pauls_botnet/&quot;&gt;Salon&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071031-ron-paul-camp-gets-over-enthusiastic-with-spam.html&quot;&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/&quot;&gt;Wired Magazine&apos;s &quot;Threat Level&quot; blog&lt;/a&gt;, the latter in a set of followup posts by writer Sarah Stirland: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/10/astroturfing-in.html&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/10/more-on-ron-pau.html&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/10/ron-paul-spam-u.html&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;. The Ron Paul fan response was swift and decisive: clearly the botnet was the work of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nolanchart.com/article259.html&quot;&gt;anti-Ron Paul hackers trying to discredit his campaign&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://disinter.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/giuliani-behind-alleged-ron-paul-spam/&quot;&gt; Rudy Giuliani had paid Stirland (and not UAB Computer Forensics) to do a smear piece&lt;/a&gt;   -- as claimed by a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5LgUiz2mBA&quot;&gt;YouTube video&lt;/a&gt; pointing to posts on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rudygiulianiforum.com/index.php?topic=38.0&quot;&gt;RudyGiulianiForum.com&lt;/a&gt;. Thus proving, once again, that the Ron Paul campaign&apos;s greatest liability is not so much his &lt;a href=&quot;http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2007/06/ron-paul-vs-new-world-order.html&quot;&gt;far-right conspiracy-driven antifederal libertarianism&lt;/a&gt;, but rather &lt;a href=&quot;http://suicidegirls.com/news/politics/22557/&quot;&gt;the spittle-flecked anger&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://spaceramblings.blogsome.com/2007/11/02/ron-paul-supporters-gaming-youtube-digg-to-smear-reporter-critical-of-ron-paul/&quot;&gt;his own noisiest supporters&lt;/a&gt;.

Beets are great! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/15/124912/740&quot;&gt;Ron Paul!&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66234</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:16:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>botnet</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>cults</category>
		<category>libertarian</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ronpaul</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>brownpau</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Senate AntiSpam Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29118/Senate%2DAntiSpam%2DBill</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/7079710.htm"&gt;Senate approves  S.887 Can-Spam Bill.&lt;/a&gt; Spammers unhappy.FTC to report to Congress with a plan for creating a Do-Not-E-mail registry.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29118</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2003 04:05:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FTC</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<dc:creator>elpapacito</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Have you been spamvertized?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27788/Have%2Dyou%2Dbeen%2Dspamvertized</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spamvertized.org/updates.html"&gt;Spam and politics&lt;/a&gt; collide at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spamvertized.org/&quot;&gt;Spamvertized&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;small&gt;Via the CNET &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-5065141.html&quot;&gt;Dean spam&lt;/a&gt; story.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27788</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:57:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<category>Spamvertised</category>
		<dc:creator>turbodog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7624/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nandotimes.com/technology/story/0,1643,500559618-500799961-504316963-0,00.html"&gt;Rep. Bob Barr (Georgia) in full support of Spam&lt;/a&gt; The title says it all.  But read his reasoning.   He would rid us of Clinton but protect the right of business to annoy us with spam.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7624</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2001 07:39:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BobBarr</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Nandotimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>usgovernment</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3632/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.echampions2000.com"&gt;The GOP just spammed me. &lt;/a&gt; I received an email sent supposedly on behalf of &quot;Jim Nicholson, Chairman, Republican National Committee&quot; inviting me to become an &quot;eChampion&quot;:
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;I&gt;Once you&apos;ve registered as an eChampion, you will receive fact-filled e-mails twice a week on the upcoming election, the candidates&apos; stands on issues, etc. Your role as an eChampion is to send these e-mails on to AS MANY friends, neighbors and family members as possible, and invite them to register as eChampions themselves at http://www.echampions2000.com. &lt;/I&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
No, I didn&apos;t opt-in to some Republican mailing list. For a start, I&apos;m Canadian, in Canada, and if I was going to vote for a right-wing wing-nut, it would be &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.canadianbusiness.com/magazine_items/2000/sept04_00_memo.shtml&quot;&gt;Stockwell Day&lt;/A&gt;.  Talk about &quot;idea viri&quot;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3632</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:00:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RNC</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


