<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Spam and microsoft</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Spam+microsoft</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Spam' and 'microsoft' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:40:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:40:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The dry, technical language of Microsoft&apos;s October update did not indicate anything particularly untoward.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82489/The%2Ddry%2Dtechnical%2Dlanguage%2Dof%2DMicrosofts%2DOctober%2Dupdate%2Ddid%2Dnot%2Dindicate%2Danything%2Dparticularly%2Duntoward</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227121.500-the-inside-story-of-the-conficker-worm.html"&gt;Its reach is impossible to measure precisely, but more than 3 million vulnerable machines may ultimately have been infected.&lt;/a&gt; : The inside story on the Conficker Worm at  New Scientist.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82489</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:40:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Kaspersky</category>
		<category>malicious</category>
		<category>Malware</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Security</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>TrendMicro</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>worm</category>
		<category>Zombiebotarmy</category>
		<dc:creator>The Whelk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>With our powers combine we are captain bandiwth leech</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37316/With%2Dour%2Dpowers%2Dcombine%2Dwe%2Dare%2Dcaptain%2Dbandiwth%2Dleech</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4051553.stm"&gt;Bwahahahahaha&lt;/a&gt; - Take a shot back. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_gates&quot;&gt;Bill Gates&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3426367.stm&quot;&gt;promised&lt;/a&gt; to end &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spamming&quot;&gt;spam.&lt;/a&gt; Now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lycos.com&quot;&gt;lycos&lt;/a&gt; is letting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/stud/fachschaften/fs-angl/images/unclsam.gif&quot;&gt;you&lt;/a&gt; take a shot back ala &lt;a href=&quot;http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/&quot;&gt;SETI&lt;/a&gt;.  Get your copy and &lt;a href=&quot;http://makelovenotspam.com/intl/&quot;&gt;make love not spam.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37316</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:39:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antispam</category>
		<category>BillGates</category>
		<category>Lycos</category>
		<category>MakeLoveNotSpam</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>screensaver</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<dc:creator>sourbrew</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Slicing off the spam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26466/Slicing%2Doff%2Dthe%2Dspam</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2999126.stm"&gt;So... Microsoft sue some spammers.&lt;/a&gt; Isn&apos;t this an unique case of the nut trying to hit back at the sledgehammer?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26466</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 22:48:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>spammers</category>
		<dc:creator>apocalypse miaow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Two Faces of AOL and Microsoft&apos;s Spam Policies</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25675/The%2DTwo%2DFaces%2Dof%2DAOL%2Dand%2DMicrosofts%2DSpam%2DPolicies</link>
		<description> Perhaps you&apos;ve seen the new MSN commercials that use M$&apos;s &quot;spam-blocking&quot; technology to support their ISP service. Maybe you&apos;ve read fluff pieces like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;node=&amp;contentId=A37742-2003Feb20&amp;#0172;Found=true&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt;, where AOL and Microsoft execs are allowed to wax poetic about their deep anti-spam convictions:

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;&apos;I get spam too, and I am as fed up with it as all of our members are,&apos; AOL chief executive Jonathan F. Miller said yesterday.&quot; 

&quot;&apos;To help keep intruders at bay,&apos; Microsoft said, &quot;we must all do our part.&apos;&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

So what&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/5476163.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; all about?

&quot;&apos;AOL and Microsoft argue there is a place for legitimate unsolicited e-mail in the marketplace,&apos; said Marc Berejka, Microsoft&apos;s senior director of public policy.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25675</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 09:08:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericaOnline</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>Email</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>ISP</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Policy</category>
		<category>SPAM</category>
		<dc:creator>Pinwheel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9389/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.electric-find.com/microsoft_email.htm"&gt;MSN blocks its subscribers&lt;/a&gt; from sending mail with non-Outlook mail clients, as of last week.  Like AOL, MSN hasn&apos;t allowed its subscribers to check their MSN mail with non-MS mail clients &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?th=8a6cf29a124cd83f,2&quot;&gt;since the beginning&lt;/A&gt;.  Last April, they &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?th=1579aab776ababdb,25&quot;&gt;banned access&lt;/A&gt; to non-MSN SMTP servers (&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-5531362.html?tag=bplst&quot;&gt;to block spam relaying&lt;/A&gt;), but you could still send mail to other ISPs through MSN&apos;s SMTP server using your mail client of choice with a &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://supportservices.msn.com/us/content/qanda/_email_port25.htm&quot;&gt;simple fix&lt;/A&gt;.  Now, you can only do so if you switch to Outlook or Outlook Express (quietly announced &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://supportservices.msn.com/us/announcements.asp&quot;&gt;on their site&lt;/A&gt; and via &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://snowmane.julianhaight.com/pipermail/spamcop-help/2001-June/010544.html&quot;&gt;e-mail&lt;/A&gt;).  All others (&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?q=author:doofkater%40eudoramail.com&amp;selm=9jn841%24js5%241%40news.netmar.com&quot;&gt;Eudora&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?th=9dd87156ccf82b82,5&quot;&gt;Pegasus&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?th=2e6e9a911cb0e70b,15&quot;&gt;Agent&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?th=3964a28d0c306128,7&quot;&gt;Yahoo Mail&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?th=e0011342d71b4157,5&quot;&gt;Netscape Messenger&lt;/A&gt;) are left cold.  &lt;FONT SIZE=&quot;-2&quot;&gt;(more inside...)&lt;/FONT&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9389</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<dc:creator>waxpancake</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


