<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with SpinMagazine</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/SpinMagazine</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'SpinMagazine' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:29:02 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:29:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16672/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spin.com/new/features/videofeatures/april2002top40-1-20.html"&gt;Spin Magazine continues pathetic slide into utter mediocrity.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Our Top 40 may not move as many units as &apos;N Sync once did, but then again, neither does &apos;N Sync.&lt;/i&gt;  And by highlighting such unknown, airplay-deprived and impoverished artists as Jay-Z, U2, Linkin Park and Creed, Spin proves just how far they&apos;ve sunk.  Hey, Spin?  Your cred called to laugh at you.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16672</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:29:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>magazines</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>spinmagazine</category>
		<category>top40</category>
		<dc:creator>solistrato</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13715/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/Music/01/10/music.greatest.reut/index.html"&gt;The Ramones named #2 band of all time&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spin.com&quot;&gt;Spin&lt;/a&gt; magazine, following the Beatles at #1.  I think we all can agree to disagree about the vailidity of the yearly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grammy.com/awards/grammy/nominees.html&quot;&gt;Grammy nominations&lt;/a&gt;, but when given a little more time, you&apos;d think that the editors of Spin could come up with something better than placing The Smiths at #21, or Fugazi at #31.  In other news, Bruce Springsteen was left off the list.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13715</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:28:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bands</category>
		<category>best</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>entertainment</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>Spin</category>
		<category>SpinMagazine</category>
		<dc:creator>padjet1</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


