<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with TLD and domains</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/TLD+domains</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'TLD' and 'domains' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2001 01:40:33 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2001 01:40:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7715/</link>
		<description> More info about the soon to be released .biz and .info TLDs...this time, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icann.org/announcements/icann-pr15may01.htm&quot;&gt;straight from the horses mouth&lt;/a&gt;, so to speak.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7715</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2001 01:40:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biz</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>icann</category>
		<category>info</category>
		<category>tld</category>
		<category>topleveldomains</category>
		<dc:creator>canoeguide</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6278/</link>
		<description> Last week, we got news of new.net, who decided to make a big splash in the alternative Top Level Domain (.com/.net/etc) game, with some moronic, un-coordinated with the other people scheme including some &quot;patented new technology&quot; that amounted to &apos;set new.net as the search path in your DNS setup&apos;.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Well, apparently they&apos;ve started a trend, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tch.org/tld/press.html&quot;&gt;now there&apos;s another player in the market&lt;/a&gt;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6278</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2001 19:00:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>TLD</category>
		<category>TLDs</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6196/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.new.net/"&gt;New.net lauched today,&lt;/a&gt; with their attempt to create their own TLD registrar that seems like a bastardization of DNS. Most people will need to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.new.net/help_faq.tp#tc-3&quot;&gt;download a plugin&lt;/a&gt;, is there any chance this could be successful? Is ICANN doing anything to stop them or will they just die on their own?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6196</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2001 11:01:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>DomainNames</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>new.net</category>
		<category>registrar</category>
		<category>TLD</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4449/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/14999.html"&gt;Maybe ICANN really can&apos;t.&lt;/a&gt; There may be a revolt among all those Europeans who think that they own their parts of the Internet. (Who do they think they are, anyway? Don&apos;t they realize that they&apos;re just electronic colonies of the US?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually, I&apos;m with them; I think ICANN is getting just a little too full of itself.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4449</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2000 08:14:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>icann</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>tld</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4176/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.icann.org/tlds/report/"&gt;New top level domains?&lt;/a&gt; It looks like we&apos;re one step closer to the creation of some new domains. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icann.org/&quot;&gt;ICANN&lt;/a&gt; has posted their staff recommendations. How did your favorite fare?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4176</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2000 05:37:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>TLD</category>
		<dc:creator>Aaaugh!</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2548/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-16jul00.htm"&gt;ICANN&apos;s Report on new Top Level Domains&lt;/a&gt; came out a few days ago, and I saw a list in a paper of some of the new proposed TLDs. These include: .shop, .travel, .news, .sex or .xxx, .web, .arts, .store. Two things worthy of discussion - what&apos;s the difference between .shop .store and .web (and where are other CONTENT based divisions such as .gay, .fan, .info, .zine, .kids) and secondly, why are these supposedly GLOBAL domain names all in full uncompressed English?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2548</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2000 06:50:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>TLD</category>
		<dc:creator>barbelith</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


