<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Technology and security</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Technology+security</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Technology' and 'security' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:45:47 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:45:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Looky Here</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66225/Looky%2DHere</link>
		<description> Say hello to the newest police method for human identification: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bi2technologies.com/index.html&quot;&gt;iris&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.securimetrics.com/solutions/hiide.html#&quot;&gt;scanning.&lt;/a&gt; The Alameda County Sheriff&apos;s Office is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/11/05/MN2NT4QLR.DTL&quot;&gt;preparing to become the first public agency in the Bay Area to scan the irises of convicted sex offenders.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66225</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:45:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fingerprint</category>
		<category>iris</category>
		<category>scan</category>
		<category>scanning</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>fandango_matt</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What do you know about CALEA?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27019/What%2Ddo%2Dyou%2Dknow%2Dabout%2DCALEA</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030710.html"&gt;Bob Cringely thinks the government&apos;s information gathering capability is a disaster waiting to happen.&lt;/a&gt; Does our government have too much faith in computers as a solution to our problems?  Just as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/21377&quot;&gt;electronic voting&lt;/a&gt; is looked at skeptically by the computer-savvy among us, so should the use of computers to gather information.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27019</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:27:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BobCringely</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>Cringely</category>
		<category>eavesdropping</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>RobertCringely</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>TedW</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Reasonable security measures or invasion of privacy?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21867/Reasonable%2Dsecurity%2Dmeasures%2Dor%2Dinvasion%2Dof%2Dprivacy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/PEstory/TGAM/20021125/UAMERN/International/international/international_temp/5/5/20/"&gt;This article is about new border crossing security measures that are supposedly in the works.&lt;/a&gt; Cross the U.S. border in a few years, and a hidden camera may zero in on you from 150 metres away, able to recognize you by the shape of your face, perhaps by the telltale markings of your eyeball or even in the way you walk past the border guard.

In milliseconds, a supercomputer would sift through a massive &quot;data warehouse,&quot; able to dip into your life: Credit-card purchases, travel patterns, health and banking records would all be scanned. Your old telephone conversations -- in any language -- would be instantly available, along with e-mails that you sent years ago.

Perhaps they&apos;ll even be able to read your MetaFilter posts.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21867</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:05:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>internationalborders</category>
		<category>privacyissues</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>orange swan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18174/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992483"&gt;Did you install it yet?&lt;/a&gt; You may want to think twice. That new software update for Windows Media Player isn&apos;t just a security update, if you read the End User License Agreement carefully, it states: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;In order to protect the integrity of content and software protected by digital rights management &apos;Secure Content&apos;, Microsoft may provide security related updates to the OS Components that will be automatically downloaded onto your computer.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Does anyone know anything more about this? How about recommendations for a suitable replacement for WMP?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18174</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 19:05:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>Hackworth</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17337/</link>
		<description> Does &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,52739,00.html&quot;&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt; have a place in society anymore?  Or is it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privacy.org/&quot;&gt;incompatible&lt;/a&gt; with a crowded and technologically-advanced world?  If we must submit to constant surveillance, who should we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/02.06.97/cover/brin1-9706.html&quot;&gt;trust to watch&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17337</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2002 09:23:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>tech</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13612/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wherifywireless.com/corp_home.htm&quot;&gt;For Paranoid Parents everywhere&lt;/a&gt;. A global satellite positioning wristwatch, in happy-happy day-glo colours, that you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wherifywireless.com/prod_watches.htm&quot;&gt;security-clamp onto your kid&apos;s wrist&lt;/a&gt;. Then, at your office terminal, you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wherifywireless.com/screen2.html&quot;&gt;find out &lt;b&gt;exactly&lt;/b&gt;where they are&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;b&gt;Love&lt;/b&gt; the 911 button. How about actually &lt;i&gt;playing&lt;/i&gt; with your kids, rather than launching them out into the urban wilderness, on a wireless tether? &quot;Latch-key&quot; takes on a whole new dimension.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13612</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 04:36:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>GPS</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>tracking</category>
		<category>watches</category>
		<dc:creator>theplayethic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9419/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/20766.html"&gt;Anti-rip CD system bypassed.&lt;/a&gt; heh.  nice try, boyos.  i&apos;ve never understood how people can believe something digitized can possibly be protected in such a manner as to be foolproof.  what one process can scramble, another can undo. [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slashdot.org&quot;&gt;/.&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9419</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2001 11:16:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CDs</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>cracked</category>
		<category>Macrovision</category>
		<category>mp3</category>
		<category>ripping</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>TheRegister</category>
		<dc:creator>fuzzygeek</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9373/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010730/ts/tech_codered_dc.html"&gt;Code Red.&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft NT, 2000, and ISS users beware, and resurgance of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/9144&quot;&gt;code red&lt;/a&gt; virus may rear it head again tomorrow. Be sure to get all &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalisland.net/codered/&quot;&gt;patched&lt;/a&gt; up  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9373</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2001 19:04:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>Hackworth</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9075/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20433.html&quot;&gt;Win XP&apos;s Product Activation as a breeze to hack.&lt;/a&gt;  Provided that RC1 still ships as is and you keep your RAM locked at a fixed number of sticks, it&apos;s simply a matter of keeping a backup of a DBL file.  For all the ballyhoo, it&apos;s amazing that something this obvious slipped under the cracks.  With WPA this sloppy, is this the only half-hearted facet of Windows XP?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9075</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:04:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>activation</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>hacked</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5913/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/magazine/mar01/print_version/schmidt.html"&gt;Beyond the bar code:&lt;/a&gt; Tags on retail products will send radio signals to their manufacturers, collecting information about consumer habits -- and raising privacy concerns. Radio tag technology is already here, used in fields such in livestock, freight-train cargo and highway tolls. The only barrier to widespread use is consumer products is price. When they can be made for a penny, expect to see them everywhere. From the March issue of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technologyreview.com/&quot;&gt;MIT Technology Review&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5913</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:51:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>barcode</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>radio</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>jhiggy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5906/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/01/02/19/010219hnnsa.xml?p=br&amp;amp;s=7"&gt;NSA has lost the techno war. It says.&lt;/a&gt; But do we believe them? Or is this merely intended to lull us into complacency?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5906</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:18:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>it</category>
		<category>nsa</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5568/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/29/technology/29CAP.html"&gt;John Draper says he&apos;s going straight for good &lt;/a&gt; and looking to &quot;pay back society for [his] deeds in the past,&quot; by working with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shopip.com/&quot;&gt;software security outfit&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5568</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:01:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>hacker</category>
		<category>JohnDraper</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>phonephreak</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>idiolect</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3340/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.networkice.com/altivore/"&gt;Roll your own Carnivore.&lt;/a&gt;  A network security firm has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/13412.html&quot;&gt;released its own software package&lt;/a&gt; to duplicate the abilities of the FBI&apos;s packet-sniffing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.robertgraham.com/pubs/carnivore-faq.html&quot;&gt;black box&lt;/a&gt;. Or at least, its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20000720.html&quot;&gt;admitted&lt;/a&gt; abilities.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3340</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:23:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>altivore</category>
		<category>blackice</category>
		<category>carnivore</category>
		<category>networkice</category>
		<category>networksecurity</category>
		<category>packetsniffing</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>harmful</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2509/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.kgw.com/tech/story.html?StoryID=2953"&gt;Mitnick is free to use computers for work&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&quot;[The] federal judge has ruled that such blanket restrictions are unacceptable and job offers should be considered on a case-by-case basis.&quot;

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2509</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2000 11:56:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>hacker</category>
		<category>kevinmitnick</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1148/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/features/00/03/28/183219.shtml"&gt;jon kats on &quot;geek profiling&quot;:&lt;/a&gt; &quot;W.A.V.E joins new sofware &quot;security&quot; programs ... being tested in public schools in America to compile and computerize information on students believed to be dangerous or potentially violent. This new rat-on-kids industry is an offshoot of the Geek Profiling anti-Net hysteria that broke out all across the United States after the Columbine High School killings, whose first anniversary is fast approaching. Despite the fact that horrific incidents like Columbine are extremely rare, and that the FBI and Justice Department have both reported that youth violence has dropped to its lowest levels in more than half a century, the belief persists in much of America that technologies like the Internet (and activities like computer gaming) are turning otherwise healthy school children into mass murderers.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1148</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:44:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>columbine</category>
		<category>development</category>
		<category>geek</category>
		<category>jonkats</category>
		<category>profiling</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>palegirl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/731/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.discovery.com/area/technology/hackers/hackers.html"&gt;The Discovery Channel has a pretty good &quot;Hackers Hall of Fame&quot;&lt;/a&gt; but of course they get hacking/phreaking/cracking all munged up. There&apos;s a brief bio and short synopsis of activities for each person.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.731</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2000 09:37:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>discovery</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


