<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with UK and election</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/UK+election</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'UK' and 'election' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 11:37:42 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 11:37:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Let&apos;s</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/103193/Lets</link>
		<description> Today, the UK is voting on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13284737&quot;&gt;a series of national and local elections&lt;/a&gt; along with a referendum on whether to adopt the Alternative Vote system. The referendum has caused &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/av-referendum/8490194/AV-referendum-Chris-Huhne-in-Cabinet-bust-up-with-David-Cameron-and-George-Osborne-in-Cabinet-over-voting-reform-leaflets.html&quot;&gt;fierce rows&lt;/a&gt; within the Coalition, with &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/factcheck-av-round-up-the-truth-behind-the-claims/6364&quot;&gt;accusations of lies&lt;/a&gt; flying around, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/factcheck-clegg-huhne-and-the-250m-question-who%E2%80%99s-right-about-the-cost-of-av/6410&quot;&gt;the supposed high cost of an AV system&lt;/a&gt;. Most polls indicate that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/may/04/av-referendum-nick-clegg-defeat-predicted?intcmp=239&quot;&gt;AV will not be adopted&lt;/a&gt;, spelling yet another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/may/04/av-referendum-pre-mortem-voting-reform?intcmp=239&quot;&gt;potential disaster&lt;/a&gt; for the Liberal Democrats.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2011:site.103193</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 11:37:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>av</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>fptp</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>adrianhon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Swiftboating considered harmful.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/97330/Swiftboating%2Dconsidered%2Dharmful</link>
		<description> UK (ex)MP Phil Woolas has indicated he will seek a  judicial review of the decision today to void his election victory of earlier this year. He was found guilty of &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11699888&quot;&gt;knowingly making false statements about [rival candidate] Mr Watkins in campaign literature&lt;/a&gt;&quot;. Woolas claims the ruling will &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politics.co.uk/news/general-election-2010/court-strips-woolas-of-saddleworth-seat-$21385427.htm&quot;&gt;inevitably chill political speech&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, whereas the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11701978&quot;&gt;Justices&apos; ruling&lt;/a&gt; found that his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/gallery/2010/nov/05/phil-woolas-campaign-literature#/?picture=368405600&amp;index=0&quot;&gt;Election Literature&lt;/a&gt; breached UK laws.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.97330</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:16:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>oldham</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>woolas</category>
		<dc:creator>samworm</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Indecision day UK style</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/91853/Indecision%2Dday%2DUK%2Dstyle</link>
		<description> Following days of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/gordon-brown/7707887/A-Labour-Lib-Dem-coalition-is-not-what-we-voted-for.html&quot;&gt;uncertainty&lt;/a&gt; not witnessed since &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_general_election,_February_1974&quot;&gt;1974&lt;/a&gt;, David Cameron makes a hasty entrance to 10 Downing Street, an hour or so after &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8673608.stm&quot;&gt;Gordon Brown&lt;/a&gt; made a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8675913.stm&quot;&gt;surprisingly hasty exit&lt;/a&gt;. We began today with the unlikely, but possible prospect of seeing a Liberal Democrat/Labour &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/bradshaw-backs-browns-progressive-coalition-1968607.html&quot;&gt;progressive coalition&lt;/a&gt;&quot; government following last week&apos;s UK general election &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/&quot;&gt;ending up as a hung parliament&lt;/a&gt;.

But talks between Labour and the Lib Dems did &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/11/labour-liberal-democrat-coalition-revolt-mps&quot;&gt;not meet with success&lt;/a&gt;, and so earlier this evening, Gordon Brown went to Buckingham Palace to tender his resignation to the Queen, forcing the hand somewhat of the Tories and the Lib Dems, who have not finished their coalition negotiations at the time of writing.

The upshot is that David Cameron, as leader of the biggest Party post-election, went to see the Queen shortly after Brown left her, asking permission to try and form a government.

With permission granted, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8675265.stm&quot;&gt;he is now in No. 10 Downing Street&lt;/a&gt;. We know there is to be a full coalition government for a fixed term (unheard of in UK politics), with some cabinet seats going to the Liberal Democrats, but we as yet do not know the details - and crucially for Liberal Democrats, whether we are to have any possibility of proportional representation the next time we go to the polls.

&lt;small&gt;I bet someone else has posted something in the time it has taken me to write this&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.91853</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 13:59:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cameron</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>davidcameron</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>general</category>
		<category>libdems</category>
		<category>liberaldemocrats</category>
		<category>tories</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>idiomatika</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dr Evan Harris - The Liberal Democrat&apos;s Dr Death?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/91244/Dr%2DEvan%2DHarris%2DThe%2DLiberal%2DDemocrats%2DDr%2DDeath</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/cristinaodone/100035241/the-lib-dems-are-a-jekyll-and-hyde-party-forget-nice-mr-clegg-what-about-dr-death/"&gt;The new focus on the Liberal Democrats sees the Daily Telegraph&apos;s Cristina Odone profiling Dr Evan Harris.&lt;/a&gt; That&apos;s &quot;profiling&quot; in the sense that the FBI might profile a criminal. A criminal the papers are calling Dr Death. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk&quot;&gt;The Daily Telegraph&lt;/a&gt;, the standard bearer of British conservatism and the best-selling broadsheet paper in the UK, has been caught, like the rest of the country, slightly on the hop by the strong showing of Nick Clegg in the first televised debate between the leaders of the three leading British political parties. Clegg has been elevated in the public eye over the Lib Dem&apos;s previous biggest gun, the highly respected Treasury Spokesman and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TS3cSXigmLM&quot;&gt;ballroom dancer&lt;/a&gt; [YT] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vincentcable.org.uk/&quot;&gt;Vince Cable&lt;/a&gt;.

Cristina Odone, former editor of the Catholic Herald and deputy editor of the New Stateman, is now a columnist-slash-blogger for the Telegraph, and chose to focus on a relatively little-known character, the Shadow Science Minister Dr Evan Harris. And how.

Noting that his critics call him &quot;Dr Death&quot;, Odone takes strong issue with Harris&apos; position on voluntary euthanasia (for), the freer availability of abortion (for), God (anti) and abortion levels in the United Kingdom (indifferent). She warns that:

&lt;b&gt;Labour still has a rump of Christian socialists. The Tories are relatively sympathetic to faith. The Lib Dems are now the most secular party in the Britain &#8211; and not in a good way. There&#8217;s something sinister about a movement that, in my view, doesn&#8217;t hold all life precious; that thinks that less than perfect lives can be dispensed with on grounds of &#8220;compassion&#8221;. Remember that creepy side of the Lib Dems next time you see Clegg bouncing with vitality.&lt;/b&gt;

It&apos;s interesting to see, post-Twitter, how the comments run. Up to 11am today, the comments universally support Odone and criticise Harris and the Liberal Democrats. After that, it&apos;s one-way traffic the other way.

Matters of policy and etiquette aside, Odone does raise an interesting question - to what extent should Britain expect its leaders to be religious? After all, the country still has an established church, although one to which neither Harris nor Odone belong. She has also drawn unexpected attention to Dr Harris. So, since this appears to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/91185/Who-knows-Clegg-they-would-say&quot;&gt;Liberal&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/91117/I-agree-with-Nick-youre-no-Jack-Kennedy&quot;&gt;Democrat&lt;/a&gt; week, Dr. Evan Harris:

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1118497/&quot;&gt;In 2000, he volunteered to be injected with a trial AIDS vaccine.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2003/oct/21/NHS.medicineandhealth&quot;&gt;In 2003, he stepped down as Health Spokesman to care for his terminally ill partner.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;li&gt;He appears not to be a huge fan of homeopathy - he took part &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpIyhEOEy8g&quot;&gt;in the symbolic mass overdose of homeopathic remedies outside Boots&lt;/a&gt; [YT]. Before that, he got quite snarky about the importance of shaking homeopathic remedies, on page 108 of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scribd.com/doc/27285329/Evidence-Check-2-Homeopathy&quot;&gt;Health Check on Homeopathy&lt;/a&gt;. Video of his questions &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3W0X_44YYI&amp;NR=1&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, in which he asks (at 6:45) why the waters in homeopathic remedies retain the memory of the medicine placed in them pre-dilution, but not the memory of poo.

&lt;li&gt;He was awarded a &quot;Golden Ammonite&quot; for his work to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.secularism.org.uk/lordsapproveabolitionofblasphemy1.html&quot;&gt;remove the crimes of blasphemy and blasphemous libel from the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill&lt;/a&gt;. He is also a Vice President of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.humanism.org.uk/home&quot;&gt;British Humanist Association&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;li&gt;He wanted to&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7841775.stm&quot;&gt; reform the Act of Settlement, which bars the heir to the throne from marrying a Catholic.&lt;/a&gt;
Damien Thompson, then editor of the Catholic Herald, clearly preferred the idea to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/8163131/Evan_Harris_let_me_tell_you_where_you_can_shove_your_attempt_to_reform_the_Act_of_Settlement/&quot;&gt;proponent&lt;/a&gt;. Oh, and what do you know? He actually is called Dr Death.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

He also has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://drevanharrismp.wordpress.com/&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;. All of which leaves me wondering - why do Liberal Democrats&apos; resum&amp;eacute;s seem so much more &lt;i&gt;colourful&lt;/i&gt; than their counterparts in the major parties? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.91244</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:37:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cristinaodone</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>evanharris</category>
		<category>liberaldemocrats</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>Telegraph</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>ukpress</category>
		<dc:creator>DNye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I agree with Nick: you&apos;re no Jack Kennedy.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/91117/I%2Dagree%2Dwith%2DNick%2Dyoure%2Dno%2DJack%2DKennedy</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7596178/TV-election-debate-Nick-Cleggs-star-rises-in-great-showdown.html&quot;&gt;Yesterday, the leaders of the three largest political parties in the UK&lt;/a&gt; engaged in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7099620.ece&quot;&gt;live televised election debate&lt;/a&gt; for the first time in history. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/15/leaders-debate-nick-clegg-tv&quot;&gt;Most&lt;/a&gt; commentators &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7596570/Nick-Cleggs-TV-debate-performance-changed-election-dynamic-says-Ashdown.html&quot;&gt;seem&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Leaders-Debates-Tory-Leader-David-Cameron-Says-Nick-Clegg-Had-A-Good-Debate/Article/201004315604524?f=rss&quot;&gt;agree&lt;/a&gt; that Nick Clegg, the leader of Britain&apos;s perennial third party the Liberal Democrats, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/election_2010/8625850.stm&quot;&gt;made the best impression&lt;/a&gt; in yesterday&apos;s first of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_general_election_debates,_2010&quot;&gt;three weekly debates&lt;/a&gt; leading up to the general election on May 6. The  progressive-leaning Guardian even goes so far as to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/16/nick-clegg-guardian-icm-poll-pm&quot;&gt;claim that he is now prime ministerial material&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This being Metafilter you will undoubtedly ask, &quot;how does Cory Doctorow figure into all of this?&quot; Well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/apr/16/digital-economy-act-cory-doctorow&quot;&gt;he agrees&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/lib-dems-will-call-for-repeal-of-digital-economy-act-683988&quot;&gt;with Nick&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Economy_Act_2010&quot;&gt;Digital Economy Act&lt;/a&gt;. Then again, Nick is &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.twitter.com/search?q=iagreewithnick&quot;&gt;agreed with&lt;/a&gt; quite a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/16/leaders-tv-debates-jonathan-freedland&quot;&gt;lot&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.91117</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:05:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>clegg</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>davidcameron</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>debates</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>ge2010</category>
		<category>generalelection</category>
		<category>gordonbrown</category>
		<category>iagreewithnick</category>
		<category>labour</category>
		<category>libdem</category>
		<category>libdems</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>nickclegg</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>tories</category>
		<category>tory</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>ukpolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>UK Election Statisitics Brain-Candy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/90839/UK%2DElection%2DStatisitics%2DBrainCandy</link>
		<description> Hurtling &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/90758/General-Election-called-in-the-UK&quot;&gt;as we are&lt;/a&gt; towards an election that will be the most closely contested for a generation, where can we in the UK get a hit of statistical brain-candy? Well, no-one&apos;s going to do it quite as well as FiveThirtyEight did it for our transatlantic chums (though they will be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/search/label/United%20Kingdom&quot;&gt;posting on the UK&lt;/a&gt;), but try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/&quot;&gt;Electoral Calculus&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/&quot;&gt;UK Polling Report&lt;/a&gt;. For information about voting, try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aboutmyvote.co.uk/default.aspx&quot;&gt;About My Vote&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.90839</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:10:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>UKelection</category>
		<dc:creator>hydatius</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>General Election called in the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/90758/General%2DElection%2Dcalled%2Din%2Dthe%2DUK</link>
		<description> UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown has &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8603591.stm&quot;&gt;called for an election on the 6th of May&lt;/a&gt;.  Parliament will be dissolved on &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8496591.stm&quot;&gt;April 12th&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://itn.co.uk/0aaf55269728611811d5b5e6c1a67502.html&quot;&gt;The Conservative lead in the polls has been cut in the last few months&lt;/a&gt;, and while they &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/interactive/2010/apr/06/general-election-2010-polling&quot;&gt;still lead overall&lt;/a&gt; according to some surveys, a hung parliament is looking &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8335377.stm&quot;&gt;increasingly likely&lt;/a&gt;.  This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/feb/14/hung-parliament-not-weak-economy&quot;&gt;may&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economicvoice.com/pound-follows-gravity-at-prospect-of-hung-parliament/5007328#axzz0kJkL0eyV&quot;&gt;may not&lt;/a&gt; be a good thing for the UK economy.  Of course, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-uk-election-polls-can-be-misleading-2010-04-06?reflink=MW_news_stmp&quot;&gt;polls can be misleading&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2010/apr/06/general-election-cabinet-ministers-under-threat&quot;&gt;Some members of the current cabinet are particularly under threat.&lt;/a&gt;

From the second link, there will be further TV debates on the 15th, 22nd and 29th of April. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.90758</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:22:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>gordonbrown</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>iso_bars</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What happens if David Cameron loses?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/90460/What%2Dhappens%2Dif%2DDavid%2DCameron%2Dloses</link>
		<description> Most people assumed the Tories would walk the coming election. But with their poll lead evaporating, what would a Conservative defeat mean for Britain &#8211; and David Cameron? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/mar/25/general-election-what-if-tories-lose&quot;&gt;What happens if David Cameron loses?&lt;/a&gt; Sidebar: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/mar/25/britain-hung-parliament-1974&quot;&gt;Britain&apos;s last hung parliament&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.90460</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:16:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>davidcameron</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>generalelection</category>
		<category>gordonbrown</category>
		<category>hungparliament</category>
		<category>labour</category>
		<category>liberaldemocrats</category>
		<category>nickclegg</category>
		<category>parliament</category>
		<category>tories</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Hate Wins</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82284/Hate%2DWins</link>
		<description> The far-right, whites-only&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8088607.stm&quot;&gt; British&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8088381.stm&quot;&gt;National&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/5474602/European-elections-2009-BNP-successes-horrific-say-main-parties.html&quot;&gt;Party&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stopthebnp.org.uk/&quot;&gt;BNP&lt;/a&gt;) has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/jun/08/european-elections-bnp-gordon-brown&quot;&gt;won&lt;/a&gt; two seats (Andrew Brons, Nick Griffin) in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/07/european-elections-manchester-liverpool&quot;&gt;the&lt;/a&gt; European Parliament. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_National_Party&quot;&gt;According to its constitution, the BNP is &quot;committed to stemming and reversing the tide of non-white immigration and to restoring, by legal changes, negotiation and consent the overwhelmingly white makeup of the British population that existed in Britain prior to 1948.&quot; The BNP also proposes &quot;firm but voluntary incentives for immigrants and their descendants to return home.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82284</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:40:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bnp</category>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>eu</category>
		<category>farright</category>
		<category>fascism</category>
		<category>hate</category>
		<category>mep</category>
		<category>neonazi</category>
		<category>nickgriffin</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>racism</category>
		<category>thebnp</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>chuckdarwin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>George Galloway</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41790/George%2DGalloway</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/news_web/video/9012da68000c040/bb/09012da68000c156_bb_16x9.asx"&gt;Highlight of the election coverage:&lt;/a&gt; George Galloway is the leader of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.respectcoalition.org&quot;&gt;Respect&lt;/a&gt; and won a historic and unexpected victory against the Blairite Oona King, on an anti-war ticket. He was then interviewed by Jeremy Paxman, an increasingly controversial interviewer well known for asking questions absurd numbers of times until they get answered - a technique which arguably backfires here. You might want to watch Galloway&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/news_web/video/9012da68000c040/bb/09012da68000c155_bb_16x9.asx&quot;&gt;acceptance speech &lt;/a&gt;first. &lt;small&gt;[Windows Media. My two cents: Paxman is an egregious cock, more interested in getting his eternally righteous indignation across than any issues.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41790</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 06:18:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amusing</category>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>Britain</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>election2005</category>
		<category>GeorgeGalloway</category>
		<category>Labour</category>
		<category>OonaKing</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Respect</category>
		<category>RespectTheUnityCoalition</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>Pretty_Generic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Blair wins third term in UK</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41778/Blair%2Dwins%2Dthird%2Dterm%2Din%2DUK</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/vote_2005/frontpage/4519863.stm"&gt;Blair wins third term in UK&lt;/a&gt; overcoming public outcry against his handling of the war in Iraq. His Labour party was elected despite attracting votes from only 22% of those eligible to do so.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41778</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 21:58:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2005</category>
		<category>blair</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>general</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>drewlondon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>UK Election 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41768/UK%2DElection%2D2005</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/election2005/archives/2005/05/05/follow_the_election_with_guardian_unlimited.html"&gt;Psephologists rejoice!&lt;/a&gt; The Guardian will be blogging the UK election as it happens, and there&apos;s already some comments and links to other online discussions. As the UK polls close at 10:00 pm, this means that early results and exit polls will be in late afternoon for US poll-watchers.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41768</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 11:41:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>carter</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s a basic irony, folks...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41735/Its%2Da%2Dbasic%2Dirony%2Dfolks</link>
		<description> I&apos;m amused by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,31-2005200954,00.html&quot;&gt;today&apos;s Editorial in The Sun&lt;/a&gt;. It starts off with how a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,19809-1595686,00.html&quot;&gt;protest vote against Labour&lt;/a&gt; may mean &apos;you could be signing a young person&apos;s death warrant&apos; due to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/quote.jsp?id=84&quot;&gt;Liberal Democrat party&apos;s drugs policy&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The second half of the newspaper&apos;s editorial is a tribute to &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4505047.stm&quot;&gt;Anthony Wakefield&lt;/a&gt;... whose death came, of course, as part of the Blair government&apos;s war in Iraq... a basic irony that the newspaper has failed to pick up on. [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2005/05/desperate.asp&quot;&gt;Bloggerheads&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For those who don&apos;t know, The Sun - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3255626a12,00.html&quot;&gt;which backs Blair&lt;/a&gt;, though not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.backingblair.co.uk&quot;&gt;like this&lt;/a&gt; - is the UK&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.netimperative.com/2004/09/13/Online_readers_Sun&quot;&gt;biggest selling newspaper&lt;/a&gt; and is owned by Rupert Murdoch.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41735</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 22:04:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blair</category>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>labour</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>murdoch</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>tapeguy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lee and Dan&apos;s Excellent Adverts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41658/Lee%2Dand%2DDans%2DExcellent%2DAdverts</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/special-reports-storypage.jsp?id=67"&gt;The truth behind the spin?&lt;/a&gt; - three party political broadcasts (.wmv) made by &lt;a href=&quot;http://leeanddan.com/&quot;&gt;Lee and Dan&lt;/a&gt;, the men behind the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/38736&quot;&gt;VW Suicide Bomber&lt;/a&gt; advert, and commissioned by the UK&apos;s Channel 4  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41658</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:23:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Advertising</category>
		<category>Conservative</category>
		<category>Election</category>
		<category>Labour</category>
		<category>Liberal</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Spoof</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Navek Rednam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rock the vote</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41220/Rock%2Dthe%2Dvote</link>
		<description> In 21 days the UK will be holding a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/vote_2005/basics/4351315.stm&quot;&gt;general election&lt;/a&gt;, and people around the country will be &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/vote2005/voters_guide/html/default.stm&quot;&gt;voting&lt;/a&gt; for the next government. Can&apos;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aboutmyvote.co.uk/&quot;&gt;choose&lt;/a&gt; between the different &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/vote2005/issues/html/grid.stm&quot;&gt;parties&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whoshouldyouvotefor.com/&quot;&gt;Who should you vote for?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41220</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:44:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>vote</category>
		<dc:creator>Mwongozi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>...and a robber button is?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41040/and%2Da%2Drobber%2Dbutton%2Dis</link>
		<description> &quot;Before, during and after the upcoming [United Kingdom] general election campaign, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/&quot;&gt;Channel 4 FactCheck&lt;/a&gt; will provide the most reliable analysis of what the political parties and their leaders are saying. The site will scrutinise interviews, speeches and manifesto pledges - informing public debate by creating a popular resource for an information-hungry electorate.&quot; A UK cousin to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.factcheck.org/&quot;&gt;FactCheck.org&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41040</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 02:14:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>scrutiny</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>nthdegx</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8151/</link>
		<description> Unfortunately, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.news.yahoo.com/010608/80/bubpc.html&quot;&gt;Jam Wrestling Party&lt;/a&gt; failed to win a seat in the UK Elections. I think this is a real shame. I mean, can anyone else think of a better use for the Millennium Dome?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8151</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2001 01:52:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>jam</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>wrestling</category>
		<dc:creator>davehat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Vote early, vote often.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8130/Vote%2Dearly%2Dvote%2Doften</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news8.thdo.bbc.co.uk/cgi-bin/vvmain.fcgi"&gt;Vote early, vote often.&lt;/a&gt; (With apologies for sticking this on the front page.) Using your skill and judgement, predict the winning party in the UK general election, size of the majority, and the number of seats won by the Lib Dems. Closest to the actual result gets a gift subscription to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.private-eye.co.uk&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Private Eye&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the fortnightly antidote to British politics and media, or the equivalent value in that international currency: Amazon vouchers.  (And if you&apos;ve emailed me already, there&apos;s no need to post a prediction.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8130</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2001 12:18:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


