<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with US and women</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/US+women</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'US' and 'women' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:55:06 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:55:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>&quot;Never, ever let anybody use your gender as an excuse.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/127399/Never%2Dever%2Dlet%2Danybody%2Duse%2Dyour%2Dgender%2Das%2Dan%2Dexcuse</link>
		<description> &quot;Women get flustered under fire. They&apos;re too fragile, too emotional. They lack the ferocity required to take a life. They can&apos;t handle pain. They&apos;re a distraction, a threat to cohesion, a provocative tease to close-quartered men. These are the sort of myths you hear from people who oppose the U.S. military&apos;s evolving new rules about women in combat. But for women who have already been in combat, who have earned medals fighting alongside men, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gq.com/news-politics/newsmakers/201305/united-states-military-women-gq-may-2013?printable=true&quot;&gt;the war stories they tell don&apos;t sound a thing like myths&lt;/a&gt;&quot; Multi-page &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gq.com/news-politics/newsmakers/201305/united-states-military-women-gq-may-2013&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; to the article.

&lt;strong&gt;Additional Feature&lt;/strong&gt;
* &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gq.com/news-politics/newsmakers/201305/military-women-101st-airborne&quot;&gt;Women of the 101st Airborne Division&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;As part of Nathaniel Penn&apos;s &quot;Natural Born Killers&quot;&#8212;an oral history documenting the experiences of American female soldiers on the field that marks the official lifting of the U.S. military ban on women in combat roles&#8212;in the May issue of GQ, we spoke to a group of female servicewomen currently stationed in Fort Campbell, K.Y. as they prepare for deployment to Afghanistan this spring. These soldiers were assigned to the 4th Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division roughly a year ago as part the Women in The Service Review program. The program first introduced women to historically male-held roles in combat arms battalions&#8212;an experiment, in part, to make sure that they could handle it. Mission accomplished. Here, five of them talk to us about past deployments, navigating expectations, and their changing roles in the Army.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Video&lt;/strong&gt;
* &quot;Natural Born Killers: &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.gq.com/watch/natural-born-killers-battle-tested&quot;&gt;Battle Tested&lt;/a&gt;&quot;
* &quot;Natural Born Killers: &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.gq.com/watch/natural-born-killers-battle-ready&quot;&gt;Battle Ready&lt;/a&gt;, Women of the 101st Airborne&quot; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2013:site.127399</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:55:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>afghanistan</category>
		<category>airborne</category>
		<category>army</category>
		<category>brigade</category>
		<category>combat</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>interview</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>soldier</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>stereotypes</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>warfare</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Makers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120564/Makers</link>
		<description> In February, PBS and AOL launched &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.makers.com&quot;&gt;Makers&lt;/a&gt;, a video archive containing personal stories and anecdotes told in the first person by women, many of whom have sparked groundbreaking changes in American culture. The project aims to become &quot;the largest and most dynamic collection of women&apos;s stories ever assembled.&quot; A three-hour &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.makers.com/blog/makers-documentary&quot;&gt;documentary&lt;/a&gt; is being prepared for PBS from selections of the site&apos;s footage, which will air next year.

* &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.makers.com/makersblog&quot;&gt;Blog&lt;/a&gt; 
* &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.makers.com/moments/&quot;&gt;Search the site&lt;/a&gt; 
* &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.makers.com/browse#all&quot;&gt;Browse&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(Link goes to their entire archive. You can also review by category.)&lt;/small&gt;
* &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.pbs.org/video/2262701296&quot;&gt;Short video&lt;/a&gt; promoting the site. 
* Trailer for the documentary, which will be called &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.pbs.org/video/2273015711&quot;&gt;&quot;Makers: Women Who Make America&quot;&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2012:site.120564</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:24:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>american</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>change</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>documentary</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>makers</category>
		<category>pbs</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>trailblazers</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stag Party</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/114273/Stag%2DParty</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/gop-women-problem-2012-4/&quot;&gt;The GOP&#8217;s woman problem is that it has a serious problem with women.&lt;/a&gt; Frank Rich on George Stephanopoulos&apos;s unanswered question,  how the Republicans have shifted to being the party of misogyny since the 70s, and why Mitt Romney would be just as bad as Rick Santorum.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2012:site.114273</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:01:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2012</category>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>birthControl</category>
		<category>contraception</category>
		<category>Election</category>
		<category>Family</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>fertility</category>
		<category>FrankRich</category>
		<category>GeorgeStephanopoulos</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>misogyny</category>
		<category>MittRomney</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>RickSantorum</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>thepill</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>warOnWomen</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Blame Brit for pitch shift!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/110414/Blame%2DBrit%2Dfor%2Dpitch%2Dshift</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/12/vocal-fry-creeping-into-us-speec.html"&gt;American Woman:&lt;/a&gt; Vocal fried. On the partial glottalization of speech in young English speaking American women.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2011:site.110414</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:11:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>English</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>linguistics</category>
		<category>speechpatterns</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>vocalfry</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>emilycardigan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Abortion Not OK in OK</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/91537/Abortion%2DNot%2DOK%2Din%2DOK</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/202373/Oklahomas_unconscionable_new_abortion_laws"&gt;Provoking pro-choice advocates,&lt;/a&gt; Oklahoma passed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/28/us/28abortion.html&quot;&gt;two highly restrictive abortion laws&lt;/a&gt; on Tuesday. &lt;a href=&quot;http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/2009-10bills/HB/HB2780_ENR.RTF&quot;&gt;One&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(rtf file)&lt;/small&gt; requires doctors to show women an ultrasound of their fetus and point out its physical characteristics &#8212; even if the patient was impregnated through rape or incest.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/2009-10HB/HB2656_int.rtf&quot;&gt;second&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(rtf file)&lt;/small&gt; stipulates that doctors cannot be sued if they decide to lie to an expectant mother regarding her baby&apos;s birth defects.  A third &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126308988&quot;&gt;requires clinics to post signs&lt;/a&gt; telling patients they cannot be forced to have an abortion.  The first law &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsok.com/new-oklahoma-abortion-law-faces-battle/article/3457384&quot;&gt;prompted&lt;/a&gt; an immediate &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsok.com/hearing-set-on-abortion-lawsuit/article/3457614&quot;&gt;lawsuit&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=16&amp;articleid=20100429_16_A1_Theonl668772&quot;&gt;Tulsa&apos;s only abortion clinic&lt;/a&gt;. Reactions: 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=12394175&quot;&gt;Oklahoma Patients&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/04/28/carr.abortion.oklahoma/index.html?hpt=T2&quot;&gt;National Institutes of Reproductive Health&lt;/a&gt;

The Week: &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/202399/Americas_5_strictest_abortion_laws&quot;&gt;America&apos;s Five Strictest Abortion Laws&lt;/a&gt;

Alternet: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/146662/&quot;&gt;Shocking Law&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/83454/&quot;&gt;Women Seeking Abortions Must Have Ultrasounds Against Their Will&lt;/a&gt;

Mary Spaulding Balch, Director of the Department of State Legislation at the National Right to Life Committee &lt;small&gt;(This quote only addresses the first law)&lt;/small&gt;: &lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;This is a victory for the women of Oklahoma and their unborn children. Abortion is a business, the least time spent with a woman, the least information given to her, the more sales made. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lifenews.com/state5036.html&quot;&gt;This law protects a mother&apos;s right to know something about her developing unborn child.&lt;/a&gt; It gives her a window to her womb. It help to prevent her from making a decision she may regret for the rest of her life and it empowers her with the most accurate information about her pregnancy so that she can make a truly informed &apos;choice&apos;.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.91537</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:42:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>birthdefects</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>fundamentalism</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>hippocraticoath</category>
		<category>hypocrisy</category>
		<category>incest</category>
		<category>informedconsent</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>OK</category>
		<category>oklahoma</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>pregnancy</category>
		<category>prochoice</category>
		<category>prolife</category>
		<category>rape</category>
		<category>reproduction</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>roe</category>
		<category>RoevWade</category>
		<category>selectivereduction</category>
		<category>transparency</category>
		<category>tulsa</category>
		<category>ultrasounds</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>veto</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Jimmy Carter gets out</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83422/Jimmy%2DCarter%2Dgets%2Dout</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jul/12/jimmy-carter-womens-rights-equality"&gt;Jimmy Carter leaves the Southern Baptist Church&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;[M]y decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention&apos;s leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be &quot;subservient&quot; to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service. This was in conflict with my belief - confirmed in the holy scriptures - that we are all equal in the eyes of God.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83422</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:32:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>baptist</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>jimmycarter</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>thisiswhatafeministlookslike</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>ThePinkSuperhero</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Team Lioness - Female Soldiers in Combat in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76538/Team%2DLioness%2DFemale%2DSoldiers%2Din%2DCombat%2Din%2DIraq</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=18513&quot;&gt;Team Lioness&lt;/a&gt; is the name given to a group of female soliders, (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/lioness/film.html&quot;&gt;the&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lionessthefilm.com/&quot;&gt;documentary&lt;/a&gt; about them) who were some of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91698225&quot;&gt;first&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/03/2008_12_wed.shtml&quot;&gt;women&lt;/a&gt; in modern American warfare to engage in frontline combat &#8212; something that is officially forbidden by the military. &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arktimes.com/Articles/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=403cb6c1-f8ea-4b99-bc72-2391d1ade68d&quot;&gt;The&lt;/a&gt; female support soliders were assigned to the 1st Engineer Battalion and they were recruited to accompany Marine units during raids. Originally, the female soldiers were there to search and detain any women they came upon and to guard the unit&apos;s Arabic interpreter. Over time, however, as the situation in Ramadi deteriorated, the Marine units transitioned into a more offensive role, baiting insurgents into firefights in order to draw them out. Until officers higher up the chain got spooked over the possibility of a female soldier killed in combat and quietly disbanded the unit, members of Team Lioness were often right in the thick of things, including some of the fiercest urban firefights of the Iraq War.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76538</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:49:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>army</category>
		<category>combat</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>marines</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>nooneyouknow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Forever Pregnant II: Morality Boogaloo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52078/Forever%2DPregnant%2DII%2DMorality%2DBoogaloo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.glamour.com/features/healthandbody/articles/060403fewohe"&gt;The new lies about women&apos;s health&lt;/a&gt; (image slightly NSFW) according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.glamour.com&quot;&gt;Glamour&lt;/a&gt;. More on why &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/51727&quot;&gt;every egg is sacred&lt;/a&gt; to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/32766&quot;&gt;Bush administration&lt;/a&gt;.  [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/sex/index.blog?entry_id=1493865&quot;&gt;Sex Drive Daily&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52078</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 18:43:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abstinence</category>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>birthcontrol</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Christian</category>
		<category>condoms</category>
		<category>daterape</category>
		<category>diseases</category>
		<category>doctors</category>
		<category>FDA</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>HIV</category>
		<category>HMO</category>
		<category>HPV</category>
		<category>morality</category>
		<category>ob-gyn</category>
		<category>preganacy</category>
		<category>pregnant</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>STDs</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>boost ventilator</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&#8220;Jewish Women and the Feminist Revolution&#8221; -- an online exhibit</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49819/Jewish%2DWomen%2Dand%2Dthe%2DFeminist%2DRevolution%2Dan%2Donline%2Dexhibit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.jwa.org/feminism/"&gt;&#8220;Jewish Women and the Feminist Revolution&#8221; -- an online exhibit&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49819</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 11:51:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>feminist</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>Jewish</category>
		<category>Judaism</category>
		<category>progress</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>UShistory</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<category>womensissues</category>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Kicken it in sunny Southern France</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47259/Kicken%2Dit%2Din%2Dsunny%2DSouthern%2DFrance</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/051128ta_talk_surowiecki&quot;&gt;Unions are much of the source of the E.U. vs. U.S. lifestyle difference.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47259</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 10:08:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Europe</category>
		<category>France</category>
		<category>freetime</category>
		<category>lifestyle</category>
		<category>unions</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<dc:creator>jeffburdges</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Violence Against Women</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25510/Violence%2DAgainst%2DWomen</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/templates/misc/printstory.jsp?slug=ny%2Dvpcoc293259146apr29&amp;amp;section=%2Fnews%2Fcolumnists"&gt;Violence against women&lt;/a&gt; is one issue where the current administration aligns itself with the &quot;axis of evil&quot; and &quot;known terrorist supporting countries.&quot;  I suppose they might feel it&apos;s oo bad the Taliban doesn&apos;t still rule Afghanistan so they could have one more ally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;For too long, the feminists have been pushing a radical, special-interest agenda under the erroneous mantra made rhetorical cliche by Hillary Clinton: &apos;Women&apos;s rights are human rights,&apos;&quot; writes Janice Crouse, an official of the conservative group Concerned Women for America and a member of the U.S. delegation.    ...&lt;br&gt;The alliance isn&apos;t new - it took root when the Bush administration took over. But it is often unseen. The United States has frequently sided at the UN with countries such as Algeria, Libya, Sudan, Iran and Iraq - when it was still controlled by Saddam Hussein - in battles over language involving women and children&apos;s rights.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25510</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 05:14:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>violence</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


