<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with USA and congress</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/USA+congress</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'USA' and 'congress' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:22:18 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:22:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Former United States Senator Jesse Helms, 1921 - 2008.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73042/Former%2DUnited%2DStates%2DSenator%2DJesse%2DHelms%2D1921%2D2008</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jessehelmscenter.org/news/default.asp?ID=194&quot;&gt;Fmr. US Senator&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/642/story/255955.html&quot;&gt;Jesse&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1871&quot;&gt;Helms&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blackpressusa.com/news/Article.asp?SID=3&amp;Title=National+News&amp;NewsID=4342&quot;&gt;1921&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/04/obit.helms/index.html&quot;&gt;2008&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Helms&quot;&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Jesse_Helms&quot;&gt;Wikiquote&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://home.att.net/~jrhsc/helms.html&quot;&gt;Collection of attributed quotes (unsourced)&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73042</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:22:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>congressman</category>
		<category>helms</category>
		<category>jessehelms</category>
		<category>nc</category>
		<category>northcarolina</category>
		<category>obit</category>
		<category>obituary</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>raleigh</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>senateforeignrelationscommittee</category>
		<category>snator</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What&apos;s the difference between Democratic and Republican congressmen? $55,000.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71317/Whats%2Dthe%2Ddifference%2Dbetween%2DDemocratic%2Dand%2DRepublican%2Dcongressmen%2D55000</link>
		<description> Want to live it up at the U.S. party conventions and get access to Senators and Congressmen? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-04-30-donors-conventions_N.htm&quot;&gt;USA Today&lt;/a&gt; has posted the campaign committee price lists:&lt;br&gt;
Democratic &lt;a href=&quot;http://i.usatoday.net/news/croigpdf/donorpdfs/dems2.pdf&quot;&gt;Senate&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://i.usatoday.net/news/croigpdf/donorpdfs/dems1.pdf&quot;&gt;Congress&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Republican &lt;a href=&quot;http://i.usatoday.net/news/croigpdf/donorpdfs/gop2.pdf&quot;&gt;Senate&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://i.usatoday.net/news/croigpdf/donorpdfs/gop1.pdf&quot;&gt;Congress&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you&apos;ve got the dough, you may conveniently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dscc.org/conventionPAC&quot;&gt;request a convention package&lt;/a&gt; online from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dscc.org/&quot;&gt;Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee&lt;/a&gt;.

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrcc.org/&quot;&gt;National Republican Congressional Committee&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrsc.org/&quot;&gt;NRSC&lt;/a&gt; have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrcc.org/about/default.asp?ID=37&quot;&gt;other&lt;/a&gt; price &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrsc.org/membership/&quot;&gt;lists&lt;/a&gt; on their sites, but it seems like the DSCC and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dccc.org/&quot;&gt;DCCC&lt;/a&gt; sites keep theirs under wraps.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71317</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:48:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>fundraising</category>
		<category>lobbyists</category>
		<category>lobbys</category>
		<category>money</category>
		<category>PAC</category>
		<category>PACs</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>TheOnlyCoolTim</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&#8220;A Congresswoman must look like a girl, act like a lady, think like a man, speak on any given subject with authority and most of all work like a dog.&#8221; -- Rep. Florence Dwyer, R-NJ, 1957-73</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60065/%3FA%2DCongresswoman%2Dmust%2Dlook%2Dlike%2Da%2Dgirl%2Dact%2Dlike%2Da%2Dlady%2Dthink%2Dlike%2Da%2Dman%2Dspeak%2Don%2Dany%2Dgiven%2Dsubject%2Dwith%2Dauthority%2Dand%2Dmost%2Dof%2Dall%2Dwork%2Dlike%2Da%2Ddog%3F%2DRep%2DFlorence%2DDwyer%2DRNJ%2D195773</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://womenincongress.house.gov/"&gt;Women in Congress.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60065</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 11:16:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>legislative</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Every generation needs a new revolution.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56131/Every%2Dgeneration%2Dneeds%2Da%2Dnew%2Drevolution</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/americas/06/vote_usa/html/899.stm"&gt;It&apos;s official.&lt;/a&gt; Democrats have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/senate&quot;&gt;taken&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/house/&quot;&gt;control&lt;/a&gt; of the United States &lt;a href=&quot;http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/continental/&quot;&gt;Congress&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56131</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:32:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>plexi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ah, unity</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51841/Ah%2Dunity</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/25/raid.on.congress.ap/index.html"&gt;Seperation of Power? (newsfilter)&lt;/a&gt; In a strange move, both the Rs and the Ds are livid that the FBI raided the congressional offices of Rep. William Jefferson, D-Louisiana, (who may have accepted substantial bribes). House speaker &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/html/20060524T210000-0500_105293_OBS_RAID_ON_US_CONGRESSMAN_S_OFFICE_SEEN_AS_THREAT_TO_SEPARATION_OF_POWERS.asp&quot;&gt;Hastert spoke directly with the president&lt;/a&gt;,  so, The president steps in an orders the documents sealed as a cooling off period as congress demands this is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/separationofpowers.htm&quot;&gt;separation of Powers&lt;/a&gt; issue. 
Some predict it will go to the SCOTUS.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51841</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 14:06:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>SeparationOfPowers</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WilliamJefferson</category>
		<dc:creator>edgeways</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Zoe and the DMCA</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24125/Zoe%2Dand%2Dthe%2DDMCA</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.house.gov/lofgren/congress/digital_rights.htm"&gt;Rep. Zoe Lofgren&apos;s BALANCE act attempts to protect &quot;Fair Use&quot; rights from harmful legislation like the DMCA.&lt;/a&gt; Some related links: [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.house.gov/lofgren/news/2002/summarybalance2003.htm&quot;&gt;summary&lt;/a&gt;]   [&lt;a href=&quot;http://anti-dmca.org/whats-wrong.html&quot;&gt;whats wrong with the DMCA?&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24125</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 17:18:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>DigitalRights</category>
		<category>DMCA</category>
		<category>FairUse</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>ZoeLofgren</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18529/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/DailyNews/DODcards020717.html"&gt;The U.S. Army pays for lapdances.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;In addition to the inappropriate purchases, the GAO said more than 1,200 Army employees wrote bad checks to pay their government credit card bills. Last year alone, that cost taxpayers $3.8 million in higher fees and lost rebates.&quot;  You mean, the government practices bad accounting?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.house.gov/paul/&quot;&gt;Ron Paul&lt;/a&gt; points out that the Congress commits the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul43.html&quot;&gt;worst accounting fraud of all&lt;/a&gt;.  But the most important issue of all is, with the government paying for Strip Club tips, gambling, and wine, does this mean that God will no longer bless America?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18529</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2002 07:25:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>accounting</category>
		<category>Army</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>GAO</category>
		<category>GeneralAccountingOffice</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>LewRockwell</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RonPaul</category>
		<category>spending</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnyuk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16280/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thestreet.com/funds/belowradar/10016126.html"&gt;A 401(k) is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; a Pension!&lt;/a&gt; In a pension plan, your employer invests some money and gives you some of it when you retire.  In a 401(k), they, um, don&apos;t. &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=533&amp;ncid=533&amp;e=2&amp;u=/ap/20020411/ap_on_bi_ge/enron_pensions_21&quot;&gt;Congress seems a little confused&lt;/a&gt; on this issue, however. It turns out that the 401k might be more boondoggle than boon to average people planning to retire before they die.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16280</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:19:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>401k</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>finance</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>pension</category>
		<category>pensions</category>
		<category>retirement</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>ilsa</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14148/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/24/politics/24CND-CAMP.html"&gt;Is this a real chance at campaign finance reform&lt;/a&gt; or are we just in for more partisan back and forth that in the end won&apos;t change much of anything? (NY Times link) And how long will the &quot;Enron effect&quot; last?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14148</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:47:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>CampaignFinance</category>
		<category>CampaignFinanceReform</category>
		<category>campaigns</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>funding</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>willrich</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13909/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/WolfFiles/wolffiles.html"&gt;Happy November 31st!&lt;/a&gt; Senators and Congressmen Order Botched Calendars With an Extra Day.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13909</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:18:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>31st</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>calendars</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>November</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>scottymac</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12717/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/29/national/29PORN.html"&gt;Congress is legislating free speech on the internet&lt;/a&gt; again.  Passed shortly after the Communications Decency Act was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.epic.org/cda/&quot;&gt;thrown out&lt;/a&gt; by the Supreme Court, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/court/beeson_01.html&quot;&gt;Child Online Protection Act&lt;/a&gt; isn&apos;t as broad as the CDA but does it still go too far in an effort to protect children?  Shouldn&apos;t parents be responsible for their own children?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12717</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:21:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CDA</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>COPA</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>porn</category>
		<category>pornography</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>pooldemon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11649/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,36844,00.html"&gt;Congress on Thursday chose not to extend a 1998 ban on taxes that target the Internet, meaning that, theoretically, state and local governments could begin imposing Internet taxes on Monday.&lt;/a&gt; Wow, we&apos;ve been watching over our shoulders for terrorist and congress slips us a fast one!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11649</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2001 12:09:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>FoxNews</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Sal Amander</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10814/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bennett.senate.gov/bennett_introduces_bill_to_pro.html"&gt;Silicon Valley backs Senate bill&lt;/a&gt; that would allow companies to report computer network attacks to the government without having to worry about the public finding out. The reasoning: it would encourage 
more companies to report the problems and help the 
government track down the culprits. A &lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?c107:./temp/~c10798SyQF&quot;&gt;similar bill&lt;/a&gt; is in the House.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10814</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:22:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>Mafiaboy</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>thescoop</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10769/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/57/21836.html"&gt;The register&lt;/a&gt; chimes in on new anti-terrorist bills that attack due process, the fourth amendment, and encryption.  Sample letters and information on how to contact your reps are available at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/alerts/20010921_eff_wiretap_alert.html&quot;&gt;Electronic Frontier Foundation.&lt;/a&gt; Act quickly, because congress sure will.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10769</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:33:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilLiberties</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>EFF</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>MATA</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9962/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,33854,00.html"&gt;It seems as though Gary Condit will quit Congress&lt;/a&gt; - but not until his current term expires (he&apos;ll get a bigger pension that way).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9962</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2001 12:05:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>GaryCondit</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>MuadDib</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9076/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010717/ts/congress_flag_dc_1.html"&gt;It&apos;s that time of year again!&lt;/a&gt; Yes kids, it&apos;s time once again for the &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/1153&apos;&gt;annual &lt;/a&gt; introduction of the Flag-Protection Amendment, currently being debated in the House of Reps.  Last year the bill passed the House 305-124 and was defeated in the Senate by only six votes.  It&apos;s again expected to pass the House and again expected to get shot down in the Senate, but considering the zany sitcom that 21st century American politics has become, who knows what that wacky Legislative branch will do?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9076</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:29:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>FlagBurning</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Shadowkeeper</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8691/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61471-2001Jun28.html"&gt;Muslim congressional intern removed from White House&lt;/a&gt; During a meeting between Muslim community leaders and the White House office of faith-based initiatives, too. Random administrative error, or religious profiling?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8691</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 08:03:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>Intern</category>
		<category>Muslim</category>
		<category>profiling</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6600/</link>
		<description> A giant loophole in McCain-Feingold &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ucac/20010322/cm/the_trillion-dollar_loophole_in_campaign_finance_reform__1.html&quot;&gt;will give oil companies a total exemption&lt;/a&gt; from all its propsed spending restrictions. This is levelling the playing field?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6600</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:51:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaignfinance</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>feingold</category>
		<category>johnmccain</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>mccain</category>
		<category>mccainfeingold</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>russfeingold</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6133/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/02/politics/02CENS.html"&gt;US Census not to be adjusted for undercounts.&lt;/a&gt; (NY Times, req&apos;d registration)
&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Many political strategists, Democrats and Republicans alike, say that reliance on unadjusted population figures favors Republicans in the drawing of Congressional districts, since, they say, adjustment through statistical sampling would add to customarily Democratic neighborhoods most of those who have been uncounted.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;They visited my home/office four times and never once brought the Long Form. Damnation.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6133</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2001 06:02:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>Census</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>congressional</category>
		<category>districts</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<category>undercount</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>methylsalicylate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5087/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dreier.house.gov/pr010401.htm"&gt;House Republican introduces resolution to protect ISPs&lt;/a&gt; from criminal liability for third party content. Californian David Dreier&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://dreier.house.gov/ISP_bill.pdf&quot;&gt;proposal&lt;/a&gt; isn&apos;t an actual bill but would put the House on record as supporting such protections.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5087</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2001 10:31:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>ISP</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>liability</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>thescoop</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2288/</link>
		<description> Another day, another piece of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsbytes.com/pubNews/00/151219.html&quot;&gt;unconstitutional net-censorship legislation&lt;/a&gt; in Congress. And this time it&apos;s authored by your pal and mine, John &quot;Watch Out for Charlies!&quot; McCain. Perhaps we should start a deadpool for all these bills, giving out some cash to whoever guesses the dates on which the courts throw them out?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2288</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:52:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>JohnMcCain</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>McCain</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1469/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.motherjones.com/news_wire/methweb.html"&gt;speed limit&lt;/a&gt; -- A bill banning Internet sites which publish or even link to drug-making information looks set to sail through Congress  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1469</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 16:55:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>palegirl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1153/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40691-2000Mar29.html"&gt;Yay!  The flag burning amendment is dead&lt;/a&gt; , at least for another year.  What offends me most is: why did 63 Senators vote for this?  Second most: do these people actually believe themselves when they preach that people have fought and died for the flag?  I *hope* that no soldiers have fought for the flag, per se; I would hope that our military fights for the ideals of which the flag is a nice, abstract representation.&lt;br&gt;I&apos;ve put up &lt;a href=&quot;http://q.queso.com/discuss/msgReader$328&quot;&gt;a short page with links&lt;/a&gt; to the official Congressional Record transcripts of the debate, for those who are interested.  (It gives me reading for my plane ride tomorrow, if I can avoid the calling of my Sims family.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1153</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:47:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amendments</category>
		<category>Americanpolitics</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>flagburning</category>
		<category>flags</category>
		<category>patriotism</category>
		<category>patriots</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USconstitution</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>delfuego</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


