<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with USGovernment and USPolitics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/USGovernment+USPolitics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'USGovernment' and 'USPolitics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:52:24 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:52:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Murray Waas is the new Bob Woodward</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50784/Murray%2DWaas%2Dis%2Dthe%2Dnew%2DBob%2DWoodward</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/"&gt;Murray Waas is the new Bob Woodward.&lt;/a&gt; An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5402&quot;&gt;opposing view&lt;/a&gt;. Wuh-duh-yuh-bet most Americans will be &lt;b&gt;much more&lt;/b&gt; interested in &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Entertainment/story?id=1825619&amp;page=1&quot;&gt;this story&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50784</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:52:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanThinker</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>ConspiracyTheory</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>MurrayWaas</category>
		<category>NYU</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>ValeriePlame</category>
		<category>Yellowcake</category>
		<dc:creator>spock</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Talabangilists have taken over the GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41567/Talabangilists%2Dhave%2Dtaken%2Dover%2Dthe%2DGOP</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0427/p01s02-uspo.html"&gt;Republicans;&lt;/a&gt; defending the rights of rapists to sue since 2005.  
Did you just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tompaine.com/articles/making_the_bad_worse.php?dateid=20050427&quot;&gt;impregnate your 13 year old daughter&lt;/a&gt;?  Never fear, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theorator.com/bills109/hr748.html&quot;&gt;the GOP is here&lt;/a&gt;!  They&apos;ll defend your right to keep your &quot;little secret&quot; from crossing state lines.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41567</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:20:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>AntiAbortion</category>
		<category>ChildInterstateAbortionNotificationAct</category>
		<category>ChristianScienceMonitor</category>
		<category>CIANA</category>
		<category>CSM</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>incest</category>
		<category>ProLife</category>
		<category>rape</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>EmoChild</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Congressman Matsui (D-CA) Dies of Rare Disease</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38285/Congressman%2DMatsui%2DDCA%2DDies%2Dof%2DRare%2DDisease</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/01/02/obit.matsui.ap/index.html"&gt;Congressman dies of rare disease&lt;/a&gt; Congressman Bob Matsui, who was recently elected to a 14th term in Congress, has died due to a rare stem cell disease.  Matsui, who was one of the leading opponents of President Bush&apos;s plan to eliminate Social Security, was the ranking Democrat on the Congressional subcommittee on Social Security.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38285</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2005 12:13:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BobMatsui</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>California</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>congressman</category>
		<category>Democrat</category>
		<category>Democratic</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>obit</category>
		<category>obituary</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RobertMatsui</category>
		<category>SocialSecurity</category>
		<category>StemCell</category>
		<category>USCongress</category>
		<category>USgovernment</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>expriest</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Examining Bush&apos;s stem cell policy, two years later.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29169/Examining%2DBushs%2Dstem%2Dcell%2Dpolicy%2Dtwo%2Dyears%2Dlater</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9348-2003Oct23.html"&gt;Examining Bush&apos;s stem cell policy, two years later.&lt;/a&gt; Kinsley: Put it all together, and the stem cells that can squeeze through Bush&apos;s loopholes are far less promising than they seemed two years ago, while the general promise of embryonic stem cells burns brighter than ever. If you claim to have made an anguished moral decision, and the factual basis for that decision turns out to be faulty, you ought to reconsider or your claim to moral anguish looks phony. But Bush&apos;s moral anguish was suspect from the beginning, because the policy it produced makes no sense.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29169</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2003 19:52:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>EmbryonicStemCells</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>morality</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17613/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27771"&gt;Pat Buchanan the voice of reason?&lt;/a&gt; in times of insane government decree&apos;s of &quot;with us or against us&quot; and &quot;shoot first ask questions later.&quot; Its amusing that wackos like Buchanan&apos;s viewpoints start making sense. So what is the price of the american empire?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17613</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2002 11:16:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanEmpire</category>
		<category>Buchanan</category>
		<category>Empire</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>OpEd</category>
		<category>PatBuchanan</category>
		<category>retreat</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>vincentmeanie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17270/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:luWqp-WFBVgC:www.house.gov/burton/RSC/word/Jones3.doc+H.R.+2357&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=4&amp;amp;ie=UTF8"&gt;HR-2357.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The U.S.A. prides itself as being one of the most pluralistic societies on earth, with a stunning variety of houses of worship in many communities. But the right to engage in civic activities, and especially to engage in political speech, is severely curtailed among many faith groups because of the perception that the house of worship will &lt;i&gt;lose its charitable status &lt;/i&gt;if &apos;politics&apos; is discussed.&quot; That may be &lt;a href=&quot;http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27685&quot;&gt;about to change&lt;/a&gt;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17270</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 06:39:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>501c3</category>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ChurchAndState</category>
		<category>HR-2357</category>
		<category>nonprofit</category>
		<category>PoliticalSpeech</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>aaronshaf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9007/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thedaythatcounts.org/"&gt;July 17th - The Day That Counts.&lt;/a&gt; These people have a plan to make their feelings known on the issue of public money being diverted to religious organizations. I had no idea that the atheists were so organized! Is this sort of thing a tremendous waste of time, or do you think it can, or will affect policy discussions?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9007</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:35:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>27million</category>
		<category>agnosticism</category>
		<category>agnostics</category>
		<category>atheism</category>
		<category>atheists</category>
		<category>ChurchAndState</category>
		<category>FaithBasedInitiatives</category>
		<category>marchonwashington</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>protest</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>SecularHumanism</category>
		<category>SecularHumanists</category>
		<category>SeparationOfChurchAndState</category>
		<category>taxation</category>
		<category>usgovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>kristin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4228/</link>
		<description> It turns out before the election, representatives introduced a bi-partisan bill in both the House (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:H.J.RES.113:&quot;&gt;H.J. Res. 113&lt;/a&gt;) and the Senate (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:SJ00056:&quot;&gt;S.J. Res. 56&lt;/a&gt;) to amend the Constitution to replace the electoral college with the direct election of the President and Vice President. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shinybluegrasshopper.com/reform.html&quot;&gt;Contact your reps&lt;/a&gt; to ask them to support the bills. If we&apos;re going to get electoral reform, it will be now.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4228</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2000 18:45:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amendment</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>ConstitutionalAmendment</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>ElectoralCollege</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>veruca</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3594/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://voteauction.com/"&gt;&quot;Bringing Capitalism and Democracy Closer Together&quot;&lt;/a&gt; My recent move to Seattle has lessened the value of my vote from $16.31 to $12.36. Aw, shucks.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3594</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2000 12:17:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


