<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with USMilitary and iraqwar</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/USMilitary+iraqwar</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'USMilitary' and 'iraqwar' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:04:32 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:04:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Over One Million Served And Over Half Now Prefer Home Cooking</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37737/Over%2DOne%2DMillion%2DServed%2DAnd%2DOver%2DHalf%2DNow%2DPrefer%2DHome%2DCooking</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://fairuse.1accesshost.com/news2/million.html&quot; title=&quot;The Pentagon confirmed to United Press International Wednesday that a cumulative total of 955,000 troops from all military services had been deployed for Operation Iraqi or Enduring Freedom by the end of September. More than 300,000 of those troops have been deployed more than once, the Pentagon said. One government source said the total number of troops deployed has likely hit 1 million since then. The Pentagon data shows that 708,000 of the troops who have served in war come from the active duty force. That means that roughly half of the United States&apos; 1.4 million active duty troops have gone to war. Slightly more than 245,000 troops from reserve and National Guard units have also been deployed.&quot;&gt;1 million U.S. troops have gone to war&lt;/a&gt; The data also show that one out of every three of those service members has gone more than once.  The Pentagon says more than &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/12/06/60II/printable659336.shtml&quot;&gt;5,500 servicemen have deserted&lt;/a&gt; since the war started in Iraq. &lt;small&gt;Few experts are surprised to hear that a recent army survey discovered that half the soldiers were not planning to re-enlist. Experts are divided over how stretched America&#8217;s military really is. But they agree that another conflict would put the military in overdrive. Another war would require a shift to a &#8220;no-kidding wartime posture in which everybody who could shoot was given a rifle and sent to the front,&#8221; according to John Pike, of GlobalSecurity.org.&lt;/small&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-3-1397131-3,00.html&quot;&gt;US Army plagued by desertion and plunging morale&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37737</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:04:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>deserters</category>
		<category>globalsecurity.org</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>johnpike</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>redeployment</category>
		<category>reenlistment</category>
		<category>usmilitary</category>
		<category>ustroops</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rumsfeld&apos;s War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36638/Rumsfelds%2DWar</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/&quot;&gt;Frontline: Rumsfeld&apos;s War&lt;/a&gt;, a PBS/Washington Post joint documentary that aired earlier this week is now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/view/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;. It is the inside story of Rumsfeld&apos;s battle to assert civil control over the military.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36638</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:12:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chainofcommand</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Frontline</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>PBS</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Scandal&apos;s Growing Stain</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32993/The%2DScandals%2DGrowing%2DStain</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/subscriber/cover/0,9171,1101040517-634634,00.html"&gt;The Scandal&apos;s Growing Stain&lt;/a&gt; Time Magazine: &quot;Abuses by U.S. soldiers in Iraq shock the world and roil the Bush Administration. the inside story of what went wrong&#8212;and who&apos;s to blame&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32993</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 11:12:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>abuse</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>detainees</category>
		<category>detention</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>prisoners</category>
		<category>prisons</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>USArmy</category>
		<category>USmilitary</category>
		<category>waterboarding</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You&#8217;re going to lose more people this summer than you did last year, I guarantee it.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31721/You%3Fre%2Dgoing%2Dto%2Dlose%2Dmore%2Dpeople%2Dthis%2Dsummer%2Dthan%2Dyou%2Ddid%2Dlast%2Dyear%2DI%2Dguarantee%2Dit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&amp;amp;name=News&amp;amp;file=article&amp;amp;sid=668"&gt;You&#8217;re going to lose more people this summer than you did last year, I guarantee it.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Do you feel it is possible for American citizens to support the troops without supporting the policies under which the troops are acting?&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yes. Most definitely.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31721</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:30:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bodycount</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>lettershome</category>
		<category>medic</category>
		<category>medicalcorpsman</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>patriotism</category>
		<category>reserves</category>
		<category>reservists</category>
		<category>USmilitary</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraq Lacked Atom Whack</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29205/Iraq%2DLacked%2DAtom%2DWhack</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;At least four times in the fall of 2002, the president and his advisers invoked the specter of a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/07/bush.transcript/&quot; title=&quot;Bush: Don&apos;t wait for mushroom cloud&quot;&gt;mushroom cloud&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; and some of them, including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, described &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17707-2003Oct25?language=printer&quot; title=&quot;According to records made available to The Washington Post and interviews with arms investigators from the United States, Britain and Australia, it did not require a comprehensive survey to find the central assertions of the Bush administration&apos;s prewar nuclear case to be insubstantial or untrue. Although Hussein did not relinquish his nuclear ambitions or technical records, investigators said, it is now clear he had no active program to build a weapon, produce its key materials or obtain the technology he needed for either.&quot;&gt;Iraq&apos;s nuclear ambitions as a threat to the American homeland&lt;/a&gt;... Among the closely held internal judgments of the Iraq Survey Group, overseen by David Kay as special representative of CIA Director George J. Tenet, are that Iraq&apos;s nuclear weapons scientists did no significant arms-related work after 1991, that facilities with suspicious new construction proved benign, and that equipment of potential use to a nuclear program remained under seal or in civilian industrial use. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;So in regards to Iraq&apos;s possession of &lt;em&gt;the one weapon we can be certain causes mass destruction: the atomic bomb&lt;/em&gt;, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.why-war.com/news/2002/10/07/weaponso.html&quot; title=&quot;Aum Shinrikyo employed skilled scientists and spent freely to make&apos;&apos;high grade&apos;&apos; anthrax, which it spread around Tokyo on several occasions. The cult gave up on anthrax after it failed to infect even a single person.&quot;&gt;Gregg&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newagepointofinfinity.com/homeland_security.htm&quot; title=&quot;The British and Germans used one ton of chemical weapons per fatality caused during World War I. The 1995 release of the nerve gas sarin in the Tokyo subways by the Aum Shinrikyo sect killed 12 people, fewer than a small, standard bomb might have killed in that crowded, enclosed area. An estimated 5,000 Kurds died in Saddam Hussein&apos;s chemical attack on Halabja, Iraq, in 1988, but this involved dozens of fighter-bombers making repeated low passes over the town. It&apos;s hard to imagine that terrorists could pull off such a coordinated heavy military maneuver. The image of millions cowering behind plastic sheets as clouds of biological weapons envelop a city owes more to science fiction than reality. The Japanese use of fleas infected with bubonic plague against Chinese cities in World War II was the only successful instance of bioattacks in contemporary warfare. In 1971, &apos;&apos;weaponized&apos;&apos; smallpox was accidentally released from a Soviet plant; three people died. In 1979, an explosion at another Soviet site released a large quantity of weapons-grade anthrax; 68 people died.In 1989, workers at an American government laboratory near Washington were accidentally exposed to Ebola, and it was several days before the mistake was discovered; no one died. A coordinated anthrax attack in the fall of 2001 killed five people, a tiny fraction of the number who died of influenza during the time the nation was terrified by the anthrax letters.&quot;&gt;Easterbrook&lt;/a&gt; put it, the verdict is the unsurprising (and unsurprisingly &lt;em&gt;closely held&lt;/em&gt;) nope, not, zero, zip, nada...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29205</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:43:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>DavidKay</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Easterbrook</category>
		<category>GeorgeTenet</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>IraqSurveyGroup</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>mushrooms</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Tenet</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>US Army Used Reporters for Own Ends in Iraq War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28150/US%2DArmy%2DUsed%2DReporters%2Dfor%2DOwn%2DEnds%2Din%2DIraq%2DWar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=industryNews&amp;amp;storyID=3396575"&gt;U.S. Army Used Media Cover in Iraq for Own Ends&lt;/a&gt; which sounds like a big old bowl of yellow journalism but isn&apos;t really, at least I don&apos;t think so. It was more to refute the Iraqi Minister of Lies talking about the whooping the Iraqi war machine was delivering to the coalition forces.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The main issue that the reporters had was that they were only getting the one side of the story and not the Iraqi perspective. 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
But it raises some questions about the supposed objectivity of the media. Is this a proper use of them? To help achieve military goals? Or to try to avoid more unnecessary deaths?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28150</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:51:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>reporters</category>
		<category>USArmy</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<dc:creator>fenriq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


