<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with USPresident and recount</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/USPresident+recount</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'USPresident' and 'recount' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2000 23:35:14 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2000 23:35:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4219/</link>
		<description> Ok, lastly - Why not hand-recount &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20001111/aponline130619_000.htm&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4219</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2000 23:35:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4161/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/"&gt;CNN wants to know&lt;/a&gt; shoud voters in disputed parts of Florida be allowed to vote again. Right now the tide is against it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4161</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 17:10:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>florida</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<category>uspresident</category>
		<category>votecount</category>
		<dc:creator>DragonBoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4149/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://foxnews.com/fn99/elections/florida_recount.html"&gt;80% of newly found votes in the recount are for Gore.&lt;/a&gt; So either the inital vote count was biased for Bush, or the recount - which is being much more closely watched - is biased for Gore. (Or it&apos;s just a funny coincidence. Also, monkeys might fly out of my ass.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4149</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 11:00:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>nicwolff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4136/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://miva.dmregister.com/miva/cgi-bin/miva?news/live/display.mv+direction=showstory&amp;amp;showrec=5"&gt;Bush could ask for Iowa recount / Des Moines Register web site uses something other than ASP/WinNT&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Describes possible moves and legal requirements for a recount in Iowa. Did you know that there&apos;s nothing in the Constitution about voting for president? A new state could come up with some other method of choosing electors!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4136</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 20:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iowa</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


