<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Veblen</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Veblen</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Veblen' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:23:31 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:23:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21214/</link>
		<description> Between &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carleton.edu/campus/news/wellstone.html&quot;&gt;Wellstone&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/21204&quot;&gt;Veblen&lt;/a&gt;, I got to thinking about my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carleton.edu/&quot; title=&quot;carleton college&quot;&gt;alma mater&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://ninetimesblue.com/monkees/peter.htm&quot; title=&quot;peter tork&quot;&gt;There&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thekrattclub.com/chrisk.htm&quot; title=&quot;christopher kratt&quot;&gt;are&lt;/a&gt; a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.startribune.com/stories/384/1102599.html&quot; title=&quot;jane hamilton&quot;&gt;few&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theonering.net/perl/newsview/8/992727194&quot; title=&quot;barrie osbourne&quot;&gt;others&lt;/a&gt;, off the top of my head, that this tiny, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.northfield.org/&quot; title=&quot;northfield, mn&quot;&gt;out-of-the way&lt;/a&gt; school can lay claim to. How many other prodigal children come from small colleges? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macalester.edu/admissions/academics/after_mac/kofi.html&quot;&gt;Kofi&lt;/a&gt; is one, from another small Minnesota college. Who else? Schools with more than 2,500 students need not apply.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21214</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:23:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CarletonCollege</category>
		<category>colleges</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>PaulWellstone</category>
		<category>small</category>
		<category>ThorsteinVeblen</category>
		<category>Veblen</category>
		<dc:creator>RKB</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21204/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mnc.net/norway/veblen.html"&gt;Thorstein Veblen&lt;/a&gt; , Economist and Social Commentator, who contributed to the common tongue the phrase &lt;i&gt;conspicuous consumption&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://villa.lakes.com/eltechno/TV%20WHO.html&quot; title=&quot;Some have claimed that Thorstein Veblen was the &apos;&apos;last man to know everything&apos;&apos;--an assertion even he would have disputed. But it is obvious that he certainly did his homework--his Ph. D. from Yale University was in Moral Philosophy (his doctoral thesis was on Immanuel Kant) and he spoke 25 languages while understanding history, literature, art, science, technology, devout observances, pedagogy, agriculture, labor relations, and industrial development at a near-expert or expert level.&quot;&gt;Who was Thorstein Veblen--and why should anyone care?
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/a&gt; I should like him for his writing style alone:
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;i&gt;The appreciation of those evidences of honorific crudeness to which hand-wrought goods owe their superior worth and charm in the eyes of well-bred people is a matter of nice discrimination. It requires training and the formation of right habits of thought with respect to what may be called the physiognomy of goods. Machine-made goods of daily use are often admired and preferred precisely on account of their excessive perfection by the vulgar and the underbred who have not given due thought to the punctilios of elegant consumption. The ceremonial inferiority of machine products goes to show that the perfection of skill and workmanship embodied in any costly innovations in the finish of goods is not sufficient of itself to secure them acceptance and permanent favor. The innovation must have the support of the canon of conspicuous waste. Any feature in the physiognomy of goods, however pleasing in itself, and however well it may approve itself to the taste for effective work, will not be tolerated if it proves obnoxious to this norm of pecuniary reputability.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/small&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
From  &lt;a href=&quot;http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/VEBLEN/chap06.html&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Chapter Six - Pecuniary Canons of Taste&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  of  the work entire, &lt;a href=&quot;http://xroads.virginia.edu/%7EHYPER/VEBLEN/veb_toc.html&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Theory of The Leisure Class&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Feel free to consume conspicuously.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21204</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:27:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>consumption</category>
		<category>fashion</category>
		<category>leisure</category>
		<category>Veblen</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


