<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Vioxx</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Vioxx</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Vioxx' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:07:10 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:07:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Pharma reps from another planet</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74464/Pharma%2Dreps%2Dfrom%2Danother%2Dplanet</link>
		<description> Feast your senses (including, perhaps, your sense of outrage) on this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/08/the-vioxx-v-squad-reps-from-another-universe/&quot;&gt;Merck Vioxx sales training video&lt;/a&gt;, presented in 3 parts without commercial interruption (heh) by the often interesting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pharmalot.com/&quot;&gt;Pharmalot&lt;/a&gt;. Vioxx was pulled from the market a few years ago because of cardiovascular risks (increased incidence of MI associated with Vioxx in clinical trials and post-marketing reporting). There is currently a huge class-action suit going on over Vioxx deaths, so it is interesting to see what Merck brass was telling the reps back in the early 2000&apos;s. Of particular interest is the bit about Vioxx and MI (heart attack) about 2:15 into the second clip. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74464</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:07:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>LOLPHARMA</category>
		<category>Merck</category>
		<category>Pharmalot</category>
		<category>pharmareps</category>
		<category>sales</category>
		<category>salestraining</category>
		<category>Vioxx</category>
		<category>Vsquad</category>
		<dc:creator>Mister_A</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>As you might have heard on the news today, two more women have died after taking RU-486.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50162/As%2Dyou%2Dmight%2Dhave%2Dheard%2Don%2Dthe%2Dnews%2Dtoday%2Dtwo%2Dmore%2Dwomen%2Dhave%2Ddied%2Dafter%2Dtaking%2DRU486</link>
		<description> The number of patient &lt;a title=&quot;An alternative source for the Reuters link. (via Christian Wire Service)&quot; href=&quot;http://www.earnedmedia.org/nrlc0317.htm&quot;&gt;fatalities&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;a title=&quot;In the US mifepristone is manufactured by Danco Laboratories under the tradename Mifeprex and is commonly refered to as RU-486&quot; href=&quot;http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/mifepristone/&quot;&gt;mifepristone&lt;/a&gt; abortions is estimated at 1 in 200,000&lt;sup&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;No causal relationship between [serious bacterial infection, including very rare cases of fatal septic shock] and the use of Mifeprex has been established.&quot; href=&quot;http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/mifepristone/mifepristone-qa20041115.htm&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;, about double the rate for suction-aspiration abortions of comparable terms, and about equal to the combined early and late term fatality rates for vacuum aspiration abortion.&lt;sup&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;This link may load slowly in browsers other than Internet Explorer.&quot; href=&quot;http://www.religioustolerance.org/aboru486d.htm&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; (&lt;a title=&quot;From Wikipedia&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mifeprex&quot;&gt;source&lt;/a&gt;) (&lt;a title=&quot;Two more deaths reported after abortion pil (via Reuters)&quot; href=&quot;http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&amp;storyID=2006-03-17T193051Z_01_WAT005095_RTRUKOC_0_US-ABORTION-PILL.xml&amp;archived=False&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;small&gt;&lt;tt&gt;[More inside]&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50162</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:01:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>mifepristone</category>
		<category>planb</category>
		<category>RU486</category>
		<category>vioxx</category>
		<dc:creator>sequential</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Whoa</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44430/Whoa</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/19/AR2005081900256.html"&gt;No mere slap on the wrist&lt;/a&gt; for Merck. 

Jury awards grieving widow $253.4 Mil in Vioxx suit. The first of thousands of cases like it. (washpost)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44430</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:33:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>jury</category>
		<category>justdesserts</category>
		<category>vioxx</category>
		<dc:creator>punkbitch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s a Beautiful Morning?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35946/Its%2Da%2DBeautiful%2DMorning</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2001-09-25-vioxx.htm"&gt;In September 2001&lt;/a&gt; the FDA &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/2001/9456.pdf&quot;&gt;warned Merck, &lt;/a&gt;makers of the painkiller Vioxx, for engaging in a promotional campaign that minimized &quot;potentially serious cardiovascular findings.&quot; The previous year, Merck spent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2002/02.21/06-prescription.html&quot;&gt;$161 million on Vioxx advertising &lt;/a&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercola.com/2001/dec/8/drug_advertising.htm&quot;&gt;more than Pepsi or Budweiser&lt;/a&gt; spent on advertising that year). Earlier this year, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://securities.stanford.edu/1029/MRK04-01/&quot;&gt;securities class action complaint &lt;/a&gt;was filed on behalf of several Merck investors alleging the company engaged in a marketing campaign that included false and misleading statements concerning the safety profile of Vioxx and that company insiders sold personally held shares of Merck for over $175 million in proceeds. Today, Merck &lt;a href=&quot;http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&amp;sid=a6t9wfnh4wzo&amp;refer=us&quot;&gt;withdrew Vioxx from the market.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35946</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:51:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Drugs</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>Merck</category>
		<category>Vioxx</category>
		<dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


