<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with WTC and Television</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/WTC+Television</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'WTC' and 'Television' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:53:17 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:53:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>&quot;Attacking that battle station is not my idea of courage. It&apos;s more like, suicide&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68032/Attacking%2Dthat%2Dbattle%2Dstation%2Dis%2Dnot%2Dmy%2Didea%2Dof%2Dcourage%2DIts%2Dmore%2Dlike%2Dsuicide</link>
		<description> September 11, 2001. It&apos;s 10:15 am and the South Tower just went down. Millions of French people are watching the live coverage of the events on TF1, France&apos;s major TV channel, with star anchorman Poivre d&apos;Arvor doing a running commentary. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x33uso_tf1live911starwars&quot;&gt;Then, for a split second, a character from a famous movie happily tells us (in French subtitles) that he &quot;did it&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (18 s in the video) (Dailymotion video). This is definitely not a hoax. Some people reported seing something strange (though they weren&apos;t sure of what they had seen), but, of course, the incident got lost in the flow and never got mentioned again until recently, when people converted their VHS tapes and uploaded the clips to online services. As far as I know, TF1 never explained what happened. Who hijacked the coverage, how and why it was hijacked remain a mystery. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68032</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:53:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>blooper</category>
		<category>conspiracytheory</category>
		<category>france</category>
		<category>glitch</category>
		<category>hansolo</category>
		<category>mystery</category>
		<category>starwars</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>TF1</category>
		<category>WTC</category>
		<category>WTF</category>
		<dc:creator>elgilito</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28216/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;rtsp://vidserver.alexa.com//net/ia205/4/TV_WDC-A_200109111300.mov&quot;&gt;Half an hour&lt;/a&gt;, two years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;[If the link won&apos;t work for you, copy it and open it with Quicktime.  High bandwidth required.]&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28216</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:11:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>wtc</category>
		<dc:creator>Asparagirl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18815/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-lowry23jul23.story"&gt;The Emmy nominations are out&lt;/a&gt; and the news nominations go to the biggest story, September 11.  No surprises there.  PBS has 41 nominations and Fox has 0.  No surprises there either.  Does this say something about the news industry and it&apos;s ability to discern serious news from chaff?  Is Bill Moyers a national treasure? Do you think perhaps Murdoch should rethink the direction of his media empire?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18815</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 05:59:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>awards</category>
		<category>EmmyAwards</category>
		<category>Emmys</category>
		<category>ratings</category>
		<category>September11</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<category>WTC</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14516/</link>
		<description> &quot;Everything&apos;s changed&quot;? No, very little has changed. Exhibit A: the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/06/nyregion/06TAPE.html&quot;&gt;upcoming broadcast &lt;/a&gt;of the complete &quot;in-the-belly-of-the-beast&quot; WTC collapse video by CBS. Only three &quot;very special&quot; sponsors, and 50 million are expected to watch. Including me. (Hey, I&apos;m a complicated person and/or hypocrite)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14516</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2002 07:59:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>CBS</category>
		<category>Television</category>
		<category>WTC</category>
		<dc:creator>luser</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11516/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/printedition/calendar/la-000081342oct12.story"&gt;When I think WTC attacks, I think...SITCOM?&lt;/a&gt; Uhhh, CBS, uhhh...hmmm...anyone?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11516</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:33:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>cbs</category>
		<category>sitcom</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>wtc</category>
		<dc:creator>adrober</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11090/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/enter/tv/2001-10-04-west-wing.htm"&gt;What did you think of West Wing &lt;/a&gt; last night?  Beyond the fact that it was preachy and simplistic, did you think that it was a good or bad approach to handling complex issues through a show that is respected for presenting political dialogues in a pop culture format?  Additionally, what do you think of the way in which pop culture seems to have returned to normal?  This topic appears in both the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/04/arts/04POP.html&quot;&gt;NY Times &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/life/enter/tv/2001-10-03-tv-ratings.htm&quot;&gt;USA Today&lt;/a&gt;, today, as it becomes clear that prime time ratings are stronger than ever after the attacks.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11090</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 06:08:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>westwing</category>
		<category>wtc</category>
		<dc:creator>wsfinkel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10219/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/TV/09/13/terror.entertainment/index.html"&gt;The entertainment industry reacts.&lt;/a&gt; Fox&apos;s &quot;24&quot; delayed. &quot;Spider-Man&quot; twin towers scene removed. Ah-nold&apos;s &quot;Collateral Damaged&quot; and Tim Allen&apos;s &quot;Big Trouble&quot; postponed indefinitely, TV skyline shots being re-edited, televised action movies being replaced with more humor and upbeat programming. How long will it last? And having been probed for so long, will the gaming industry do anything in turn?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10219</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:22:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>24</category>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>spiderman</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>wtc</category>
		<dc:creator>teradome</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


