<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with WTC and film</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/WTC+film</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'WTC' and 'film' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2002 20:02:39 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2002 20:02:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14028/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/21/movies/21MIND.html"&gt;In reviewing &#8216;A beautiful mind&#8217; NYT reviewer said of Nash&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Before he married Alicia &#8230;he fathered another child&#8230;. and abandoned both mother and child to poverty. He formed a number of intense, apparently sexual bonds with other men, and he lost his security clearance &#8230;.. after he was arrested for soliciting sex in a men&apos;s room. When his illness became intractable and his behavior intolerable, Alicia divorced him. &#8230;. None of this has made it to the screen.&quot; It went on to say that &quot;The story &#8230;.egregiously simplifies the tangled, suspicious world of cold war academia.&quot; Most other reviewers appears to have judged that movie on its merits as a work of art and seemed to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rottentomatoes.com/movie-1111029/ &quot;&gt; like it&lt;/a&gt;. Recently, the plans to build a statue to honor the FDNY firefighters were &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/18/nyregion/18STAT.html &quot;&gt; dropped &lt;/a&gt; after a controvery broke out over plans to alter the original image of three firefighters hoisting the American flag. In an &lt;a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/20/weekinreview/20ROZH.html&gt; article &lt;/a&gt; that tried to put the later controvery in a context, NYT said that that &quot;Sculptors, and artists in general, always take liberties&quot;. Conservative columnist Jonah Golderg in a different &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/columnists/jonahgoldberg/jg20020118.shtml&quot;&gt; column 
 &lt;/a&gt; defended the sanctity of &#8216;factual accuracy&apos; in art. I rarely agree with Goldberg. But I think if one is depicting an event or a likeness of an event one has an obligation to stay close to the truth. Where do you draw the line between creative freedom and factual accuracy? 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14028</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2002 20:02:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ABeautifulMind</category>
		<category>accuracy</category>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>CreativeLiberties</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>firefighters</category>
		<category>GroundZero</category>
		<category>JohnNash</category>
		<category>sculpture</category>
		<category>WTC</category>
		<dc:creator>justlooking</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13938/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.unitedstates.com/news/farticle/740136?20020116224038"&gt;Jerry Bruckheimer Presents: Sept. 11, the movie&lt;/a&gt; He&apos;s done Pearl Harbor, which I guess makes this a natural next step. But will he wait until the earth cools at Ground Zero? And who&apos;ll play Osama? (Link via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.darkhorizons.com/news-n.htm&quot;&gt;Dark Horizons&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13938</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:37:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>jerrybruckheimer</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>pearlharbor</category>
		<category>wtc</category>
		<dc:creator>krewson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11135/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/answ-man/sho-sunday-ebert23.html"&gt;Will a changing world change film?&lt;/a&gt; Will the Sept. 11th tragedy &lt;A HREF=http://www.artforum.com/index.php?pn=talkback&amp;id=338&gt;instill a new social or political significance to contempoary art?&lt;/A&gt;  Does this mark the &lt;a href=http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/pagesix/20010926/en/end_of_irony_1.html&gt;end of irony?&lt;/A&gt;  How do you think these recent events are going to shape film, art and comedy?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11135</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 22:00:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>wtc</category>
		<dc:creator>crog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11038/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.metaphilm.com/philms/siege.html"&gt;America&apos;s Obsession With Movies Reaches The WTC Attacks&lt;/a&gt; The website Metaphilm(grrr...)says the 1998 movie The Siege eerily anticipated the WTC attacks and offers a list of impressive coincidences to back up its analysis.  Is this taking moviemania too far?  Or is there something in it?  

&lt;i&gt;(More)&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11038</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2001 23:11:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>conspiracytheories</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>hollywood</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>thesiege</category>
		<category>WTC</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10219/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/TV/09/13/terror.entertainment/index.html"&gt;The entertainment industry reacts.&lt;/a&gt; Fox&apos;s &quot;24&quot; delayed. &quot;Spider-Man&quot; twin towers scene removed. Ah-nold&apos;s &quot;Collateral Damaged&quot; and Tim Allen&apos;s &quot;Big Trouble&quot; postponed indefinitely, TV skyline shots being re-edited, televised action movies being replaced with more humor and upbeat programming. How long will it last? And having been probed for so long, will the gaming industry do anything in turn?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10219</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:22:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>24</category>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>spiderman</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>wtc</category>
		<dc:creator>teradome</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


