<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with WashingtonPost and politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/WashingtonPost+politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'WashingtonPost' and 'politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 19:26:23 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 19:26:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Naughty politicians</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56052/Naughty%2Dpoliticians</link>
		<description> Should a politician&apos;s &quot;artistic endeavors&quot; come into play when voters go to the polls?  George Allen thinks  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drudgereport.com/flashaw.htm&quot;&gt; that parts&lt;/a&gt; of his opponent, Jim Webb&apos;s, novels are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/27/AR2006102701000.html&quot;&gt;demeaning to women&lt;/a&gt; and contain depictions of incest.  Also, Republican candidate for Texas Comptroller,  Susan Combs, is&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.votefredhead.com/susan.html&quot;&gt; being accused of writing porngraphy&lt;/a&gt; because of excerpts like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.votefredhead.com/book.html&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt; from a romance novel she wrote 15 years ago.  And they&apos;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.proteinwisdom.com/index.php/weblog/entry/16847/&quot;&gt;not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/051107ta_talk_collins&quot;&gt;the&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baen.com/chapters/1945pro.htm&quot;&gt;only&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2152402/?nav=tap3&quot;&gt; politicians&lt;/a&gt; who&apos;ve written naughty things.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56052</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 19:26:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DrudgeReport</category>
		<category>Election2006</category>
		<category>fiction</category>
		<category>GeorgeAllen</category>
		<category>JimWebb</category>
		<category>muckraking</category>
		<category>novels</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>pornography</category>
		<category>RomanceNovel</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>USSenate</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<category>writing</category>
		<dc:creator>eunoia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The DeLay-Abramoff Money Trail</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47949/The%2DDeLayAbramoff%2DMoney%2DTrail</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/30/AR2005123001480_pf.html"&gt;The DeLay-Abramoff Money Trail&lt;/a&gt; The U.S. Family Network, a public advocacy group that operated in the 1990s with close ties to Rep. Tom DeLay and claimed to be a nationwide grass-roots organization, was funded almost entirely by corporations linked to embattled lobbyist Jack Abramoff, according to tax records and former associates of the group.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47949</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:46:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Abramoff</category>
		<category>DeLay</category>
		<category>JackAbramoff</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>scandal</category>
		<category>TomDeLay</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Brewing &quot;Briefing&quot; blogging brouhaha</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47594/Brewing%2DBriefing%2Dblogging%2Dbrouhaha</link>
		<description> &lt;strong&gt;Newsfilter: &lt;/strong&gt;Washington Post columnist/blogger Dan Froomkin writes the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/linkset/2005/04/11/LI2005041100879.html&quot;&gt;White House Briefing,&lt;/a&gt;&quot; an online &quot;daily anthology of works by other journalists and bloggers,&quot; which is often critical of the administration.  This past Sunday, the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/10/AR2005121000938.html&quot;&gt;Post ombudsman wrote&lt;/a&gt; that the paper&apos;s White House correspondents worried that Froomkin&apos;s column creates an appearance of bias at the Post.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/washpostblog/2005/12/white_house_bri.html&quot;&gt;Froomkin responsed&lt;/a&gt;, and hundreds of commentors offered their support.  Then Post national politics editor &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/washpostblog/2005/12/john_harris_res.html&quot;&gt;John Harris weighed in&lt;/a&gt;, to somewhat less acclaim from commentors.  Harris expanded on his views in &lt;a href=&quot;http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2005/12/13/frm_qa.html&quot;&gt;this interview&lt;/a&gt;.  The whole affair raises issues about allegations of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/2005_12_01_firedoglake_archive.html#113451301953251801&quot;&gt;subservient, stenographic press&lt;/a&gt;, how the media &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/weblog/archives/2005/12/index.html#008619&quot;&gt;deals with charges of liberal bias&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007240.php&quot;&gt;perceived &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007241.php&quot;&gt;vindictiveness &lt;/a&gt;of the Bush administration, and the relationship between &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/12/13/splitting-newsrooms-and-hairs/&quot;&gt;in-house bloggers and the traditional media&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47594</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:36:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>froomkin</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>washingtonpost</category>
		<dc:creator>ibmcginty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The torture memoranda</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38422/The%2Dtorture%2Dmemoranda</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A62516-2004Jun22?language=printer"&gt;Links to the government memoranda on torture and the Geneva Convention can be found here&lt;/a&gt; (sign-up required) or else through the &quot;featured link&quot; on www.c-span.org.  While Alberto Gonzales will probably be confirmed as Attorney General, the memoranda were the subject of some stinging testimony by such heavy-hitters as Harold Koh, dean of Yale Law School, at the end of today&apos;s confirmation hearing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38422</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:45:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>interrogation</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>klazmataz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Marion Barry is my homeboy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35569/Marion%2DBarry%2Dis%2Dmy%2Dhomeboy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14778-2004Sep11.html"&gt;&quot;Hey, darling. Love you. Need your vote.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Politics without presidents: a soulful portrait of former DC mayor Marion Barry. I was really impressed by the dog in the left-hand corner of the picture. (registration required)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35569</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:18:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DC</category>
		<category>MarionBarry</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>Washington</category>
		<category>WashingtonDC</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>chinese_fashion</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What&apos;s your genetic fitness, eh?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35417/Whats%2Dyour%2Dgenetic%2Dfitness%2Deh</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54700-2004Sep1.html&quot;&gt;Breeders are winning&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;Conservative, religiously minded Americans are putting far more of their genes into the future than their liberal, secular counterparts.&quot; (WaPo link, &lt;a href=&quot;http://bugmenot.com/view.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2F&quot;&gt;bugmenot&lt;/a&gt; says try fedup@mailinator.com and
fedup if you don&apos;t care to register. Definition of genetic fitness &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uwasa.fi/cs/publications/2NWGA/node287.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35417</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2004 10:04:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fertility</category>
		<category>genes</category>
		<category>GeneticFitness</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>reproduction</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>jfuller</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>They don&apos;t like me, they really don&apos;t like me</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32203/They%2Ddont%2Dlike%2Dme%2Dthey%2Dreally%2Ddont%2Dlike%2Dme</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48304-2004Apr3.html"&gt;Its a vast left wing conspiracy!&lt;/a&gt; It seems that the RNC (Republican national committee) is seeing conspiracy everywhere. There are lots of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moveon.org &quot;&gt;stand alone groups&lt;/a&gt; that have been trying to get rid of this administration before Kerry showed up on the scene, and now that there is a target they want to hang everything on him. Its almost like flattery. 

Of course it reminds me of when &lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/22/146205&amp;mode=thread&amp;tid=117&amp;tid=136&amp;tid=187&amp;tid=88&amp;tid=99&quot;&gt; SCO claimed IBM was orchestrating all the bad press about them.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32203</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2004 22:16:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2004</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>RNC</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>MrLint</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Mary&apos;s Family Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31385/Marys%2DFamily%2DMatters</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dearmary.com/mary/index.html"&gt;Dear Mary,&lt;/a&gt; your father, recently said he would support adding anti-gay prejudice to the US Constitution, making you and millions of other Americans second-class citizens. As an open lesbian who has worked for years as a public advocate for gay civil rights, you are in a unique position to defend yourself and your community in this dire hour. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A487-2004Feb23.html&quot;&gt;You&apos;re right, this is very personal.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31385</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:11:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>DearMary</category>
		<category>DickCheney</category>
		<category>gayrights</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>lesbian</category>
		<category>MaryCheney</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>alms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stop Loss Orders: It&apos;s not your President&apos;s National Guard...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30470/Stop%2DLoss%2DOrders%2DIts%2Dnot%2Dyour%2DPresidents%2DNational%2DGuard</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A36979-2003Dec28?language=printer&quot; title=&gt;Army Stops Many Soldiers From Quitting&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;According to their contracts, expectations and desires, all three soldiers should have been civilians by now. But Fontaine and Costas are currently serving in Iraq, and Eagle has just been deployed. On their Army paychecks, the expiration date of their military service is now listed sometime after 2030 -- the payroll computer&apos;s way of saying, &quot;Who knows?&quot;

The three are among thousands of soldiers forbidden to leave military service under the Army&apos;s &quot;stop-loss&quot; orders, intended to stanch the seepage of troops, through retirement and discharge, from a military stretched thin by its burgeoning overseas missions.&lt;/em&gt;

As Helena Cobham &lt;a href=&quot;http://justworldnews.org/archives/000402.html&quot; title=&quot;The draft that dares not speak its name&quot;&gt;notes&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;em&gt;They don&apos;t want to call it a draft but it sure ain&apos;t your father&apos;s &quot;all-volunteer military&quot; any more...&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://acrossriver.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Marine&apos;s Girl&lt;/a&gt;, Cobham&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://justworldnews.org/archives/000358.html&quot; title=&quot;Marine&apos;s Girl being silenced-- or not? Folks-- Marine&apos;s Girl, who has been writing a great blog for the past 5-plus weeks that provides &apos;&apos;Insight on being the girl friend of a Marine in Iraq. Opinions of news items of the day, politics, and relationships&apos;&apos; is being... &quot;&gt;cause&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://justworldnews.org/archives/000367.html&quot; title=&quot;Marine&apos;s Girl : new format - She&apos;s back! If you&apos;ve missed Marine&apos;s Girl and her wonderful, fresh writing; and if you followed her harrowing story of how some random and mean-spirited old cyber-harrasser guy intimidated her into slamming the door shut on most of her great earlier content-- then you should hurry on over to Across the River, the new group blog that she&apos;s started up with a couple of friends.&quot;&gt;celebre&lt;/a&gt; of some time ago, writes about stop-loss &lt;a href=&quot;http://acrossriver.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_acrossriver_archive.html#107155793050808282&quot; title=&quot;&apos;&apos;He has a promotion coming based on his service in Iraq so I&apos;m very proud of that. A new rank! He didn&apos;t re-enlist which was my greatest fear. I can deal with unit stop-loss as that can be lifted anytime, its the re-enlistment that I did NOT want to deal with.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://acrossriver.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_acrossriver_archive.html#107190301743904661&quot; title=&quot;When he heard my voice he started crying and I cried with him, we got it worked out but he was stubborn and had this worked out in his head that it was the best for me. So formal he was on ICQ, not his normal self but after we cried on the phone...he melted back down to normal. Come to find out, he said the counselor suggested this &apos;&apos;not dragging me along anymore&apos;&apos; might be best. I asked him if they have been after him to re-enlist again, he said they had been offering him alot of things but he told them he had a better offer from me, as we planned to marry and be a family. Now a lightbulb went off for me...what are the chances they would want me out of the way then so he would re-enlist? He just got a promotion so the pressure is on again as they can&apos;t hold him forever on stop-loss but seems like they are sure trying.&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. See also&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.denverpost.com/cda/article/print/0,1674,36%257E53%257E1860164,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Amid ongoing conflicts in Iraq and elsewhere, the U.S. Army Reserve is starting to have trouble hanging on to citizen soldiers.&quot;&gt; Army reservists choosing to be citizens, not soldiers&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30470</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:58:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>army</category>
		<category>ArmyReserves</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>HelenaCobham</category>
		<category>JustWorldNews</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>NationalGuard</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>StopLoss</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>from the wilderness</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25830/from%2Dthe%2Dwilderness</link>
		<description> This unusual &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fromthewilderness.com/PDF/Washpost_2003_05_16_p25.pdf&quot;&gt;$20,000 full-page political add (pdf)&lt;/a&gt; ran on May 16th in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/&quot;&gt;The Washington Post&lt;/a&gt;. Read the fascinating &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/051603_wash_post_ad.html&quot;&gt;story&lt;/a&gt; how this unusual add came to happen, the powerful people
supporting it, the independent news site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fromthewilderness.com&quot;&gt; From The Wilderness&lt;/a&gt; behind the Add and the video &lt;i&gt;The Truth and Lies of 9-11&lt;/i&gt; that started it all.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25830</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2003 16:18:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Terrorism</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>ABC&apos;s</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24189/ABCs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/TheNote.html"&gt;ABC&apos;s blog &quot;The Note&quot; suspends operations,&lt;/a&gt; citing lack of resources needed for war coverage, the blog&apos;s humorous style not being &quot;the right national tonic,&quot; and this shocker: &quot;We suspect that the amount of strictly political news &#8212; the kind of stuff that is the meat and starch of The Note &#8212; is likely to dramatically decrease in the coming days.&quot; &lt;b&gt;GUH?&lt;/b&gt; Aren&apos;t blogs now more important than ever? Aren&apos;t &lt;i&gt;politics&lt;/i&gt; now more important than ever? What message is being sent by the mainstream media here? (Via the indispensable &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7602-2003Mar10.html&quot;&gt;Lloyd Grove&lt;/a&gt; of the Washington Post.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24189</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 07:00:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ABC</category>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>TheNote</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>PrinceValium</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Al Gore Discusses the 2000 Election and His Future in Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21703/Al%2DGore%2DDiscusses%2Dthe%2D2000%2DElection%2Dand%2DHis%2DFuture%2Din%2DPolitics</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50875-2002Nov13.html"&gt;Al Gore Tells All!&lt;/a&gt;   Okay, maybe not all, but he does give his first extended interview since the 2000 election to Liza Mundy of the Washington Post.  Mundy discussed the interview further in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://discuss.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/zforum/02/r_magazine_mundy111802.htm&quot;&gt;live forum&lt;/a&gt; earlier today.  Required reading for political junkies.  [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/weblog/&quot;&gt;Tapped&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21703</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:11:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>allgore</category>
		<category>forumdiscussion</category>
		<category>lizamundy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>wapo</category>
		<category>washingtonpost</category>
		<dc:creator>boltman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19465/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61040-2002Aug25.html"&gt;Administration Says It Can Attack Iraq without Congressional Approval&lt;/a&gt; Not a new story, per se, but this Post article lays out pretty well the arguments behind the administration&apos;s case, one being simply Bush&apos;s role as commander-in-chief. It&apos;s strange how closely this issue reflects earlier attempts by the administration to avoid Congressional and/or public scrutiny (Cheney&apos;s Enron meetings, for example). Why this aversion, and why fight so hard? And I have a sneaking fear that Bush will seek Congressional approval only after invading, and he will bully votes by claiming that reps have a patriotic duty to support a president in a time of war.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19465</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 07:16:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>risenc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19281/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/media2_aug02.shtml"&gt;The Washington Post follows an agenda.  &lt;/a&gt; There truly exists a bias in the press and here&apos;s an example.  Metatalk had a thread on there being so many NYT links, perhaps this helps explain why.  Many many more examples of the Post&apos;s biases can be found at SpinSanity and other such sites but this one comes from &quot;next door&quot; in Baltimore. &lt;br&gt;  &lt;b&gt;!Only MetaFilter is trustworthy!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;( P.S. Looking for an example of &quot;liberal bias?&quot;  This isn&apos;t it.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19281</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2002 06:08:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18723/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4863-2002Jul26.html"&gt;House likely to approve homeland security bill that erodes labor protections&lt;/a&gt; &quot;But the Senate, which likely takes up the matter next week, so far has pursued a much different course. On Thursday, the Democratic-led Senate Governmental Affairs Committee crafted legislation that would protect all current civil service protections and make it more difficult for the president to move workers out of unions. Bush and other Republicans said the measure would give the president less authority than he has now.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

The House seems to be so much more conservative and extremist than the Senate. Heck they&apos;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59078-2002Jul24.html&quot;&gt;still working on trying to ban selected types of abortion procedures&lt;/a&gt; even when there&apos;s a strong chance it won&apos;t pass constitutional muster and the Senate isn&apos;t likely to support them. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Is it your perception that the House is more conservative? If so, why do you think that&apos;s true? 



&lt;/b&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18723</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:23:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>House</category>
		<category>labor</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>unions</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>Red58</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17927/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7829-2002Jun18.html"&gt;Systemic problems&lt;/a&gt; lead to catastrophic failures.  More money for the &quot;war on terror&quot; or more government power from the Patriot Act cannot make up for incompetence, poor policy directives and bungling.  How many more of these must we see before everyone agrees that a thorough investigation leading to proper reforms is the only remedy?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17927</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:02:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>PatriotAct</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WarOnTerror</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12075/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33340-2001Nov3.html"&gt;Drastic changes due for America after terror attacks&lt;/a&gt; We are to become a garrison state, for better or worse, with the CIA more intimately involved with internal (domestic) doings and the FBI taking on new duties.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12075</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2001 13:39:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12008/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21181-2001Oct31.html"&gt;Is Blood Thicker Than Water?&lt;/a&gt; It seems to be for President Bush. He&apos;s refused to campaign for Republican governor candidates in Virginia and New Jersey facing the voters next week, even though they are both behind in the polls and could use the help. But the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21181-2001Oct31.html&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; says Bush is likely to do a fundraiser for brother Jeb who is not up for re-election until 2002. Bush &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalwire.com/archives/00000491.shtml&quot;&gt;cancelled&lt;/a&gt; another fundraiser just last week. (Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalwire.com&quot;&gt;Political Wire&lt;/a&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12008</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2001 10:43:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaigning</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>jebbush</category>
		<category>nepotism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>washingtonpost</category>
		<dc:creator>flip</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9480/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23564-2001Aug2.html"&gt;&quot;So now that I&apos;ve kissed your ass, what do I have to do to get a deal?&quot; &lt;/a&gt;  - Bush cuts a deal on the &quot;patients bill-o-rights&quot;. Is this going to appease those who keep shouting &quot;concession and bipartisanship&quot; or will they hate him all the more?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9480</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 12:25:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>CharlesNorwood</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>Norwood</category>
		<category>patients</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>revbrian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8229/</link>
		<description> In the desert on the U.S.-Mexico border, &lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49115-2001Jun10.html&quot;&gt;charity becomes political protest&lt;/a&gt; as humanitarian groups seek to put hundreds of gallons of water in the form of &quot;watering stations&quot; -- a few gallons of water and a blue flag -- on federal, military, private, and Indian lands.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8229</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:36:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>charity</category>
		<category>desert</category>
		<category>immigrants</category>
		<category>immigration</category>
		<category>Mexico</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<category>water</category>
		<dc:creator>sudama</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8012/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10066-2001Jun1.html"&gt;McCain considering whether to leave GOP&lt;/a&gt; Self-explanatory. Not exactly breaking news, considering that the National Journal reported the same (a tidbit also reported on the Web&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.orvetti.com&quot;&gt;Orvetti.com&lt;/a&gt;). It is, however, the first time I&apos;ve seen the &quot;rampant speculation,&quot; as journalists like to put it, make for a headline article in a major newspaper. McCain advocate William Kristol may be the person to watch here, since he increasingly seems to advocate a sort-of Teddy Roosevelt-like ideology. Oh, intrigue. Goodie.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8012</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2001 20:36:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>JohnMcCain</category>
		<category>McCain</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republican</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6291/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A43522-2001Mar8.html"&gt;Bush says &quot;Nuh-uh&quot; to Reagan Memorial&lt;/a&gt; Good googly-moogly, Dubya does something right!!!  Oh, gawd and I&apos;m agreeing with his decision.  I need to go wash myself.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6291</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2001 08:16:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>memorial</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Reagan</category>
		<category>RonaldReagan</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>ratbastard</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6286/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A43638-2001Mar8.html"&gt;What You See May Not Be . . . &lt;/a&gt; A memo, telling lobbyists to &quot;dress down&quot; as &quot;real workers&quot; for GOP photo op, provides rare window into a common practice on Capitol Hill. Both Republicans and Democrats go to great lengths to assemble average Americans who can convey the appropriate political message, and when they can&apos;t find any, they simply trade in their white collars for hard hats themselves  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6286</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2001 03:56:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>InternalMemos</category>
		<category>lobbyists</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>wardrobe</category>
		<category>WashingtonDC</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>frednorman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4738/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20001211/aponline155058_000.htm"&gt;she would do it all over again, &quot;only better and sooner.&quot; &lt;/a&gt; but, the last time she checked, she was out of any do-overs.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4738</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2000 05:25:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3240/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59858-2000Sep12.html"&gt;As long as we&apos;re discussing vice-presidential candidates,&lt;/a&gt; I thought I&apos;d point out this gem about the Reform Party&apos;s offering.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3240</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2000 10:02:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ReformParty</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>VicePresident</category>
		<category>VP</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>MrMoonPie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


