<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with WhiteHouse and GeorgeWBush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/WhiteHouse+GeorgeWBush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'WhiteHouse' and 'GeorgeWBush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 07:28:57 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 07:28:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Scott McClellan was &quot;badly misguided&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72049/Scott%2DMcClellan%2Dwas%2Dbadly%2Dmisguided</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10649.html"&gt;Scott McClellan wrote a book.&lt;/a&gt; The former &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Press_Secretary&quot;&gt;Press Secretary&lt;/a&gt; admits some of his answers to White House Press Corps questions were &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/05/28/2008-05-28_exaide_scott_mcclellan_rips_bushs_iraq_p.html&quot;&gt; badly misguided&lt;/a&gt;. One section of his book accuses George W. Bush of deluding himself about his alleged &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ajc.com/meetro/content/news/stories/2008/05/27/mcclellanbook_0527.html&quot;&gt;cocaine&lt;/a&gt; use.

Of course, part of the blame for the entire mess should fall on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003808655&quot;&gt;liberal media&lt;/a&gt; for being &quot;too easy on the administration during the run-up to the war...&quot;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72049</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 07:28:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>NoShit</category>
		<category>ScottMcClellan</category>
		<category>WhatHappened</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Bathtub Bobsled</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>More PR...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45859/More%2DPR</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051014/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_iraq"&gt;Bush teleconference with troops staged.&lt;/a&gt; Nothing in the article says &lt;i&gt;who&lt;/i&gt; is responsible for organizing the staged question and answer session, The White House, military officials, or others in the defense department. Just that it infact was staged, and that the troops were coached for 45 minutes prior to the actual teleconference. When Bush, in an unscripted move, asked an officer if he had anything to say, he stammered through a sentence, in stark contrast to the well put together responses to all the other questions, thanking the President and saying, &quot;I like you.&quot; More PR from the Bush administration.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45859</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:40:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>PR</category>
		<category>PublicRelations</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>teleconference</category>
		<category>troops</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>SirOmega</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>9/11 Panel: Bush White House Withheld Papers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32298/911%2DPanel%2DBush%2DWhite%2DHouse%2DWithheld%2DPapers</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59534-2004Apr7.html"&gt;9/11 Panel: Bush White House Withheld Papers&lt;/a&gt; The commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks announced yesterday that it has identified 69 documents from the Clinton era that the Bush White House withheld from investigators and which include references to al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden and other issues relevant to the panel&apos;s work.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32298</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 06:06:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>911investigation</category>
		<category>alqaeda</category>
		<category>binladen</category>
		<category>bushwhitehouse</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>osamabinladen</category>
		<category>september11</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28805/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.news-journal.com/news/content/news/ap_story.html/Washington/AP.V4746.AP-CIA-Leak.html;COXnetJSessionID=1DVvI17A96MWppdhRfajmFiv43DaYKvlRjoOHWycn1HpBcIaLeiY!1782816277?urac=n&amp;amp;urvf=1065555375"&gt;The 5pm Deadline is approaching,&lt;/a&gt; but the White House doesn&apos;t care.  The White House--expected to turn in all documents relevant to the Justice Department investigation of the Plame affair--has instead decided that a team of lawyers ought to spend two weeks determining which evidence can be used against their clients.  Meanwhile, President Bush continues his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slumdance.com/blogs/brian_flemming/archives/000390.html&quot;&gt;two-month initiative&lt;/a&gt; to get to the bottom of the matter himself.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28805</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2003 12:43:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cia</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>scooterlibby</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>valerieplame</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cherry picking shopping</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27634/Cherry%2Dpicking%2Dshopping</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34042"&gt;$20,000 bonus to official who agreed on nuke claim&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;A former Energy Department intelligence chief who agreed with the White House claim that Iraq had reconstituted its defunct nuclear-arms program was awarded a total of $20,500 in bonuses during the build-up to the war, WorldNetDaily has learned...His officers argued at a pre-briefing at Energy headquarters that there was no hard evidence to support the alarming Iraq nuclear charge, and asked to join State Department&apos;s dissenting opinion, Energy officials say.  Rider ordered them to &quot;shut up and sit down,&quot; according to sources familiar with the meeting.&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27634</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 08:28:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>bribery</category>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>deception</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>kickbacks</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>We Begin Combing in Five Minutes!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24514/We%2DBegin%2DCombing%2Din%2DFive%2DMinutes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1027-2003Mar20.html"&gt;We Begin Combing in Five Minutes!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;The White House is vowing a strong retaliatory response after the BBC aired live video of President Bush getting his hair coiffed in the Oval Office as he squirmed in his chair and practiced on the teleprompter minutes before Wednesday night&apos;s speech announcing the launch of military operations against Saddam Hussein. &lt;/i&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
It&apos;s America&apos;s Funniest Outtakes (squirm). But where can we view it?!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24514</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:55:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>grooming</category>
		<category>hairdos</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>sparky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17279/</link>
		<description> I had trouble sleeping Saturday night because of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/05/18/alqaeda.chatter/index.html&quot;&gt;CNN story&lt;/a&gt; suggesting that &quot;increased level of chatter and activity&quot; indicated that &quot;another al Qaeda terrorist operation could be in the works.&quot; The &quot;warnings&quot; have been coming ever since: &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ap/20020520/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_hijackings_109&quot;&gt;Cheney said Sunday that future attacks were &quot;almost a certainty&quot;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ap/20020521/ap_to_po/attacks_warnings_8&quot;&gt;FBI director Robert Mueller stated &quot;we will not be able to stop it&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, with &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=578&amp;u=/nm/20020521/ts_nm/attack_usa_dc_12&quot;&gt;Ridge&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=514&amp;ncid=514&amp;e=1&amp;u=/ap/20020521/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/attacks_warnings_19&quot;&gt;Rumsfeld&lt;/a&gt; spinning similar tales today. Is there a new threat? Ridge hasn&apos;t changed the nation&apos;s security alert from &quot;yellow,&quot; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ap/20020521/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/attacks_warnings_18&quot;&gt;
AP reported today&lt;/a&gt; that &quot;a top White House aide said last week&apos;s criticism prompted a two-pronged political response: Bush accused Democrats of playing politics with the issue as &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ap/20020521/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/attacks_warnings_18&quot;&gt;his advisers reminded voters that America is still a target&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17279</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 09:50:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>algaeda</category>
		<category>attacks</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>cheney</category>
		<category>cnn</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>dickcheney</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>fear</category>
		<category>fearmongering</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>robertmueller</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>target</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>terrorists</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7013/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,3-114235,00.html"&gt;Bush to frisk toddlers at annual White House Easter Egg Roll.&lt;/a&gt; High school massacres aside, isn&apos;t this going too far?  I doubt that a 2 year old could fire off several rounds on an AK-47, much less load one.  Even balloons are banned becaue they&apos;ll be mistaken for gunfire.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7013</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2001 00:10:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>dubya</category>
		<category>easter</category>
		<category>eastereggroll</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5390/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov"&gt;Welcome to a new era of drop shadows.&lt;/a&gt; Ever since Gore conceded, I was curious about the transition of the White House site. And, um, it&apos;s a little sparse right now. Did anyone catch what time it went live?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5390</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:03:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


