<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with WhiteHouse and Science</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/WhiteHouse+Science</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'WhiteHouse' and 'Science' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:41:14 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:41:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Is the Stem Cell Debate (almost) Over?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66750/Is%2Dthe%2DStem%2DCell%2DDebate%2Dalmost%2DOver</link>
		<description> After recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/61864/Embryofree-Embryonic-StemCells&quot;&gt;promising &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wi.mit.edu/news/archives/2007/rj_0606.html&quot;&gt;results  &lt;/a&gt; demonstrating the ability to change mouse skin cells into   stem cells, researchers have replicated this change in human skin cells in papers published in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1151526&quot;&gt; Science &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cell.com/&quot;&gt;Cell&lt;/a&gt; (access to full articles requires subscription) .  The White House, somehow, is trying to take &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/11/21/america/21bush.php&quot;&gt; credit&lt;/a&gt; for this. The potential of all this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/health.asp&quot;&gt; huge. &lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66750</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:41:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Cell</category>
		<category>Embryonic</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>StemCells</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>switchsonic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Scientists Accuse White House of Distorting Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31302/Scientists%2DAccuse%2DWhite%2DHouse%2Dof%2DDistorting%2DFacts</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/18/science/18CND-RESE.html?hp"&gt;Scientists Accuse White House of Distorting Facts&lt;/a&gt; The Bush administration has deliberately and systematically distorted scientific fact in the service of policy goals on the environment, health, biomedical research and nuclear weaponry at home and abroad, a group of about 60 influential scientists, including 20 Nobel laureates, said in a statement issued today.--would you believe the scientists or the people&apos;s (almost) choice? May need free reg for NY Times.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31302</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:50:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biomedical</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>scientists</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>another canary tips over</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28497/another%2Dcanary%2Dtips%2Dover</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3132074.stm"&gt;another canary tips over&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_clearingtheair.html&quot;&gt;administration&lt;/a&gt; (more specifically the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/ceq/&quot;&gt;white house council on environmental quality&lt;/a&gt; and its head &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2003/35/connaughton.html&quot;&gt;james l. connaughton&lt;/a&gt;) continue to ignore and bury the warnings of the effects global warming from their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ucsusa.org/news.cfm?newsID=267&quot;&gt;own scientists&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28497</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:31:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Arctic</category>
		<category>CEQ</category>
		<category>ClimateChange</category>
		<category>GlobalWarming</category>
		<category>ice</category>
		<category>JamesLConnaughton</category>
		<category>melting</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20718/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/10/politics/10FDA.html?ex=1035000000&amp;amp;en=af88ffea3af22c44&amp;amp;ei=5062&amp;amp;partner=GOOGLE"&gt;Bush Science: more lead for children and the healing power of Jesus.&lt;/a&gt; How many obvious right-wing ideologues with strong industry ties purporting to be objective scientists will Americans tolerate?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20718</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 01:09:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>ideology</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>scienceadvisors</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


