<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with WorldHealthOrganization</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/WorldHealthOrganization</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'WorldHealthOrganization' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:00:01 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:00:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Mass Graves of the Betrayed</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31840/The%2DMass%2DGraves%2Dof%2Dthe%2DBetrayed</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1169196,00.html"&gt;African AIDS Drug Plan Faces Collapse.&lt;/a&gt; The World Health Organization&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.who.int/3by5/about/initiative/en/index.html&quot;&gt;Three by Five&lt;/a&gt; programme seeks to supply 3 million Africans with anti-HIV drugs by 2005. But it&apos;s in danger, due to lack of cash... and opposition from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ifpma.org/&quot;&gt;special interests&lt;/a&gt; who seem to be exerting influence over the U.S. government. According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://stephenlewisfoundation.org/&quot;&gt;Stephen Lewis&lt;/a&gt;, U.N. Special Envoy for AIDS in Africa, &apos;If Three by Five fails, as it surely will without the dollars, then there are no excuses left, no rationalisations to hide behind. There will only be the mass graves of the betrayed.&apos;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31840</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Africa</category>
		<category>AIDS</category>
		<category>Drugs</category>
		<category>Envoy</category>
		<category>Lewis</category>
		<category>MassGrave</category>
		<category>SpecialInterests</category>
		<category>StephenLewis</category>
		<category>ThreeByFive</category>
		<category>UN</category>
		<category>WHO</category>
		<category>WorldHealthOrganization</category>
		<dc:creator>stonerose</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>you&apos;re my butterfly, sugar baby</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25329/youre%2Dmy%2Dbutterfly%2Dsugar%2Dbaby</link>
		<description> Yesterday the World Health Organization launched a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.who.int/mediacentre/releases/2003/pr32/en/&quot; _new&gt;report on diet and nutrition&lt;/a&gt;, saying that sugar should be restricted to 10% of caloric intake. Predictably, the sugar industry (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sugar.org/newsroom/releases.html&quot; _new&gt;press releases&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,3604,942354,00.html&quot; _new&gt;threw fits&lt;/a&gt; and called on their cronies in Congress to cut off WHO funding. Apparently they&apos;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,940287,00.html&quot; _new&gt;fighting and clawing&lt;/a&gt; even more than the tobacco industry in similar circusmtances, and WHO fears that lobbyists have more power with the Bush administration. The SA believes that inactivity, not our increased sugar consumption, is the primary cause of the obesity epidemic. Are we in for another few years of declarations of junk science and endless gov&apos;t investigations into what seems obvious, &lt;i&gt;a la&lt;/i&gt; most environmental and health concerns?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25329</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 04:03:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BigSugar</category>
		<category>carbohydrates</category>
		<category>diet</category>
		<category>fat</category>
		<category>lobby</category>
		<category>lobbyists</category>
		<category>nutrition</category>
		<category>obesity</category>
		<category>PublicHealth</category>
		<category>sugar</category>
		<category>tobacco</category>
		<category>WHO</category>
		<category>WorldHealthOrganization</category>
		<dc:creator>fotzepolitic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2378/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cato.org/dailys/07-05-00.html"&gt;&quot;If you value your health, don&apos;t trust the WHO (World Health Organization).&quot;&lt;/a&gt; As you recall, there was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://metafilter.com/detail.cfm?link_ID=2210&quot;&gt;World Health Report 2000&lt;/a&gt; issued, ranking US #37, behind Columbia, Malta and Oman.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2378</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2000 06:05:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>catoinstitute</category>
		<category>publichealth</category>
		<category>who</category>
		<category>worldhealthorganization</category>
		<category>worldhealthreport</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2210/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.who.int/whr/"&gt;World Health Report 2000&lt;/a&gt; ranks world health care systems. France #1; UK #18; Canada #30; USA #37  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2210</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:01:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>HealthCare</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>ranking</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>WHO</category>
		<category>WorldHealthOrganization</category>
		<dc:creator>mkn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


