<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with ZDNEt</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/ZDNEt</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'ZDNEt' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 07:59:06 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 07:59:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Just as long as we get to keep the guns ....\</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25043/Just%2Das%2Dlong%2Das%2Dwe%2Dget%2Dto%2Dkeep%2Dthe%2Dguns</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-994810.html"&gt;PayPal charged with breaking Patriot Act.&lt;/a&gt; Anybody care to explain what does terrorism have to do with glambing?

(No, it is not a rescued &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;q=paypal+patriot+act&quot;&gt;April fool&apos;s joke&lt;/a&gt; ...)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25043</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 07:59:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>patriotact</category>
		<category>paypal</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>zdnet</category>
		<dc:creator>magullo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21064/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/ebusiness/story/0,2000024981,20269353,00.htm"&gt;Google censors search results&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Google, the world&apos;s most popular search engine, has quietly deleted more than 100 controversial sites from some search result listings. &quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21064</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:19:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antisemitism</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>nazism</category>
		<category>scientology</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>SearchResults</category>
		<category>ZDNet</category>
		<dc:creator>mert</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19699/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-956300.html"&gt;No laptops???&lt;/a&gt; How am I going to watch my DVDs? Or, for that matter, get my ego stroked by people ogling my TiBook?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19699</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2002 11:02:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>laptops</category>
		<category>travel</category>
		<category>ZDNet</category>
		<dc:creator>fpatrick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17418/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/25436.html"&gt;TiVo and the BBC force programming on consumers. &lt;/a&gt; The BBC apparently paid TiVo to command all its boxes -- without consumers&apos; permission -- to record an episode of a drama the BBC marketing department deemed a must-see. Users can&apos;t even delete the recording -- it&apos;ll be there until TiVo decides to remove it. Can TiVo users expect to be bombarded with paid advertising after all? &lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anchordesk.co.uk/anchordesk/commentary/columns/0,2415,7112232,00.html&quot;&gt;ZDNet article here.&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17418</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2002 22:32:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>tivo</category>
		<category>zdnet</category>
		<dc:creator>mattpfeff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16650/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-891761.html"&gt;First it was the music industry complaining&lt;/a&gt; about the file sharers, now it&apos;s the file sharers complaining about people stripping the adware out of their software. More proof that &apos;piracy will find a way&apos;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16650</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2002 21:37:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adware</category>
		<category>DrDamn</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>ZDNet</category>
		<dc:creator>mrben</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12143/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2823122,00.html?chkpt=zdhpnews01&quot; target=self&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dump broadband&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;? *gasp* Well, according to this ZDNet article, it&apos;s a movement. With price hikes and a souring economy, some people can&apos;t justify the cost. Could you let it go?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12143</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2001 08:05:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abandon</category>
		<category>bandwidth</category>
		<category>broadband</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>costs</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>ISP</category>
		<category>ZDNet</category>
		<dc:creator>hotdoughnutsnow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6476/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2693351,00.html"&gt;ever wish those new laptops were a little cheaper? &lt;/a&gt; hackers have found a simple way of changing the prices on e-commerce sites and then submitting a purchase order with the new price...all in the &quot;edit page&quot; feature of your browser... suddenly network security is not the only thing to be aware of with online transactions.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6476</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:14:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ecommerce</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>theft</category>
		<category>ZDNet</category>
		<dc:creator>zerotype</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6250/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2693214,00.html"&gt;Tasteful web design:&lt;/a&gt; Remember how a couple of companies came up with the brilliant idea of putting smell-o-vision on your PC? Now one of them has realized that there&apos;s another sense left to exploit.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6250</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2001 12:17:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>zdnet</category>
		<dc:creator>harmful</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6193/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2692564,00.html"&gt;Finally!&lt;/a&gt; Someone is taking a stand about freedom of speech on the internet.  Although it is AOL (who I dislike), it is high time someone other then the ACLU take a stand for freedom of speech on the internet. (And there isn&apos;t anything wrong with the ACLU, just that it is nice to see someone else come in and back them.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6193</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2001 10:20:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aclu</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>aol.com</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>freedomofspeech</category>
		<category>zdnet</category>
		<dc:creator>da5id</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5855/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/2001/6/ns-20991.html"&gt;Tales of unmitigated stupidity.&lt;/a&gt; Some people &lt;i&gt;belong&lt;/i&gt; in jail because it&apos;s not safe for them to be left alone in public. (What&apos;s the law in the UK for dealing with a minor committing a crime like extortion? In the US, this guy would probably be tried as an adult.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5855</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:46:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>stupid</category>
		<category>zdnet</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5510/</link>
		<description> Two of the biggest tech news sites seem to be coming up a little short in the creativity department. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/&quot;&gt;ZDNet&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com/&quot;&gt;CNet News&lt;/a&gt; have both been redesigned recently, and their new similarities are astounding. Worse still, they both now feature &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-4606555.html?tag=mn_hd&quot;&gt;huge&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2678884,00.html&quot;&gt;ugly&lt;/a&gt; ads (which we&apos;re supposed to &quot;explore&quot;) that completely overwhelm the page.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5510</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2001 18:40:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cnet</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>tech</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<category>websitedesign</category>
		<category>zdnet</category>
		<dc:creator>fraying</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5065/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/2001/0/ns-19989.html"&gt;Gadgets are better than sex,&lt;/a&gt; or so lots of guys think. Kind of reminds me of that old beer joke.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5065</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2001 12:42:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>gadgets</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>ZDNEt</category>
		<dc:creator>tatochip</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4354/</link>
		<description> When asked, Apple said &quot;Of course we&apos;re going to sue &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2655145,00.html&quot;&gt;them&lt;/a&gt;, what sort of silly question is that?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4354</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:23:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apple</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>litigation</category>
		<category>ZDnet</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4300/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2653995,00.html"&gt;MacOS X built for Oracle?!&lt;/a&gt; David Coursey&apos;s &quot;top ten&quot; reasons why MacOS X was built so that Larry Ellison could become more competitive with Bill Gates.  Sounds good to me.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4300</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2000 06:42:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Macintosh</category>
		<category>MacOS</category>
		<category>MacOSX</category>
		<category>Oracle</category>
		<category>ZDNet</category>
		<dc:creator>Brilliantcrank</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2359/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2598043,00.html"&gt;Sony to introduce new CD format.&lt;/a&gt; No, it&apos;s not DVD-Music.  It&apos;s a new double-capacity CD format that Sony says &quot;will be able to prevent illegal copying.&quot;  I&apos;m assuming the new format will require all-new hardware to read and to write.  So my question is, what&apos;s the point?  Won&apos;t another music format just increase consumer confusion and make them more reluctant to buy?  Why come out with a 1.3GB format just as recordable DVDs, with much larger capacities, are becoming practical?  Do they really expect people to buy all new hardware to support what is obviously a dead-end format?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2359</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2000 07:32:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CD</category>
		<category>DoubleDensity</category>
		<category>DRM</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>Sony</category>
		<category>ZDNet</category>
		<dc:creator>daveadams</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1363/</link>
		<description> &quot;When you visit a site, you can&apos;t take that information and use it for your own purposes, especially for commercial purposes,&quot; the lawyer says. Is it just me, or will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2550905,00.html&quot;&gt;this ruling&lt;/a&gt; render every single search engine illegal?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1363</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:03:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>zdnet</category>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/643/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/1,5859,2429323,00.html"&gt;This article at zdnet&lt;/a&gt; is all about how wireless web devices aren&apos;t that handy, and how our lives would suck if wireless web access was everywhere. I heartily disagree. I have a wireless 2Mb LAN connection at work and it&apos;s liberating (it&apos;s possible to code, listen to shoutcast mp3 streams, and check email outside or down at the coffee house next door). My PCS phone is useful too, I can surf a few important websites when I don&apos;t have a laptop around, getting news, weather, and email. Wireless access is certainly a Good Thing, and should make our lives easier, but the article&apos;s author is blaming the possible deluge of information on wireless, instead of the user. &lt;b&gt;How would a wireless broadband connection make your life better or worse?&lt;/b&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.643</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2000 10:08:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>network</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>wireless</category>
		<category>ZDNet</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


