<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with abortion and Wade</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/abortion+Wade</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'abortion' and 'Wade' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:21:48 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:21:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Then and Now</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58764/Then%2Dand%2DNow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nrlc.org/news/1999/NRL999/mccain.html"&gt;McCain: I would not support repeal of Roe vs. Wade,&lt;/a&gt; Back then our hero said keep abortiion rights.  Now, though, with the gift of a more mature perspective (and a hankering for power), he says: &lt;a href=&quot;http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MCCAIN_2008?SITE=7219&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2007-02-18-20-23-58&quot;&gt;McCain: Roe V. Wade Should Be Overturned&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58764</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:21:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>McCaine</category>
		<category>roe</category>
		<category>versus</category>
		<category>wade</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>...respecting and defending the life and dignity of every human being...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48469/respecting%2Dand%2Ddefending%2Dthe%2Dlife%2Dand%2Ddignity%2Dof%2Devery%2Dhuman%2Dbeing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Roe/"&gt;Roe v. Wade,&lt;/a&gt; 33 years old today. With abortion back in the news due to the Supreme Court nomination of Alito, will the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/01/08/MNGHGGK8O81.DTL&quot;&gt;Ideological Rumble&lt;/a&gt; over the issue ever be settled or are we doomed to see questionable declarations like today&apos;s recognition of  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/01/20060120-5.html&quot;&gt;&quot;National Sanctity of Human Life Day, 2006&quot;&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;i&gt;...creating a society where every life has meaning...&lt;/i&gt;-- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/1/22/175228/539&quot;&gt;every life? Really?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48469</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:47:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>choice</category>
		<category>Court</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>life</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>Roe</category>
		<category>Wade</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Alito&apos;s Roe v. Wade comments</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47810/Alitos%2DRoe%2Dv%2DWade%2Dcomments</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/23/alito.ap/index.html"&gt;NewsFilter: Supreme Court nominee Alito advocated overturning Roe v. Wade in 1985 DOJ Memo.&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archives.gov/&quot;&gt;National Archives&lt;/a&gt; have just released a new collection of records pertaining to Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archives.gov/news/samuel-alito/accession-060-89-1/Acc060-89-1-box18-SG-AbortionsAlt-1985.pdf&quot;&gt;One document in particular (pdf)&lt;/a&gt; will likely draw considerable fire during his nomination hearings.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47810</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:22:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>alito</category>
		<category>roe</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>wade</category>
		<dc:creator>justkevin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An Abortion Clinic Nightmare or An Activism Boon?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23890/An%2DAbortion%2DClinic%2DNightmare%2Dor%2DAn%2DActivism%2DBoon</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2801839.stm&quot;&gt;A Supreme Court ruling with interesting implications&lt;/a&gt;:  All lower court racketeering convictions against pro-life protestors have been effectively overturned.  Operation Rescue is quite free to harass patients and blockade clinics again.  Is this a major dent in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saveroe.com/&quot;&gt;campaign to save &lt;i&gt;Roe vs. Wade&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;?  Or does this open up new possibilities for activists of all stripes?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23890</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:59:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>activism</category>
		<category>activist</category>
		<category>blockade</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>clinic</category>
		<category>conviction</category>
		<category>nightmare</category>
		<category>operationrescue</category>
		<category>patients</category>
		<category>prolife</category>
		<category>racketeering</category>
		<category>roe</category>
		<category>roevwade</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>wade</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14583/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://pewforum.org/deathpenalty/resources/transcript3.php3"&gt;Scalia: Think the dealth penalty wrong? Resign&lt;/a&gt; In particular, he says, any Catholic jurist who agrees with the Vatican&apos;s anti-death penalty stance should resign. One to raise an eyebrow over, given that Scalia - a jurist who just happens to be Catholic - has been a consistent foe of &lt;i&gt;Roe v. Wade &lt;/i&gt; and legalized abortion. He says his opposition to &lt;i&gt;Roe&lt;/i&gt;, however, is mainly legal, and adds that his religious views should play no role in his decisions.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14583</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2002 20:31:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Abortion</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>DeathPenalty</category>
		<category>Roe</category>
		<category>RoeVWade</category>
		<category>Scalia</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>Vatican</category>
		<category>Wade</category>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


