<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with abortion and roevwade</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/abortion+roevwade</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'abortion' and 'roevwade' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:41:13 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:41:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Body Laws</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79287/Body%2DLaws</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.kxmc.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=333726"&gt;North Dakota&apos;s House of Reps&lt;/a&gt; has passed a bill &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.feministing.com/archives/013776.html&quot;&gt;granting personhood to fetuses&lt;/a&gt;, making abortion murder and creating a challenge to Roe vs. Wade.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79287</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:41:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>fetus</category>
		<category>NorthDakota</category>
		<category>personhood</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>roevwade</category>
		<dc:creator>FunkyHelix</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>South Dakota Moves to Ban Abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49426/South%2DDakota%2DMoves%2Dto%2DBan%2DAbortion</link>
		<description> Newsfilter: On Wednesday, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://legis.state.sd.us/index.aspx&quot;&gt;South Dakota state Senate&lt;/a&gt; voted, 23 to 12, to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060223/NEWS06/602230450/1012&quot;&gt;criminalize abortion&lt;/a&gt;.  The new law makes it a felony for doctors to perform the procedure, except to save the life of a woman.  &lt;small&gt;&quot;&apos;The momentum for a change in the national policy on abortion is going to come in the not-too-distant future,&apos; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/22/AR2006022202424.html&quot;&gt;said&lt;/a&gt; Rep. Roger W. Hunt, a Republican who sponsored the bill. To his delight, abortion opponents succeeded in defeating all amendments designed to mitigate the ban, including exceptions in the case of rape or incest or the health of the woman. Hunt said that such &quot;special circumstances&quot; would have diluted the bill and its impact on the national scene.&quot;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49426</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 03:02:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>republicofgilead</category>
		<category>roevwade</category>
		<category>southdakota</category>
		<dc:creator>milquetoast</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bill aims to set up court challenge to Roe v. Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49067/Bill%2Daims%2Dto%2Dset%2Dup%2Dcourt%2Dchallenge%2Dto%2DRoe%2Dv%2DWade</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/nation/13835508.htm"&gt;South Dakota House approves sweeping abortion ban&lt;/a&gt; Although saying they personally abhor abortion, opponents made several unsuccessful attempts to make exceptions in cases of rape and incest, and to protect pregnant women whose health may be endangered.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49067</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:11:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Abortion</category>
		<category>PeakOil</category>
		<category>RoevWade</category>
		<category>SCOTUS</category>
		<category>SouthDakota</category>
		<dc:creator>Steve_at_Linnwood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Attention Deficit</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45348/Attention%2DDeficit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://mainstreambaptist.blogspot.com/2005/09/repealing-one-civil-right-at-time.html#comments"&gt;The death of Roe v. Wade from a thousand cuts&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;Two weeks ago Paul Pressler, the architect of the fundamentalist takeover of the Southern Baptist Convention, described how the Religious Right intended to deal with Roe v. Wade. After expressing his elation with the selection of John Roberts as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court he said, &quot;Roe v. Wade won&apos;t be revoked, it will die the death of a thousand cuts and qualifications and regulations until it gradually disappears.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 - Dr. Bruce Prescott, from the eyewall of America&apos;s religious wars  (Executive Director of &quot;Mainstream Oklahoma Baptists&quot;), &lt;a href=&quot;http://mainstreambaptist.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;notes&lt;/a&gt;  the culmination of long-laid plans.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45348</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 20:21:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>baptists</category>
		<category>prolife</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>religiousright</category>
		<category>reproductiverights</category>
		<category>roe</category>
		<category>roevwade</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>...semaphoring to hard-core abortion opponents...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36198/semaphoring%2Dto%2Dhardcore%2Dabortion%2Dopponents</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2108083/"&gt;Speaking in &lt;s&gt;Tongues&lt;/s&gt;Code&lt;/a&gt; --Dred Scott and Roe v. Wade and the Supreme Court and a President who signals his base in terms that fly over the heads of most of the country.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36198</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:51:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>dredscott</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>roevwade</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>On second thought ...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26539/On%2Dsecond%2Dthought</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/mccorvey1.html"&gt;Jane Roe of Roe vs. Wade wants veredict of Roe vs. Wade overturned&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;
CNN&apos;s legal expert says &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/18/otsc.toobin/index.html&quot;&gt;it will not happen&lt;/a&gt;. Findlaw.com has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://library.lp.findlaw.com/articles/file/00691/000314/title/Subject/topic/Constitutional%20Law_Privacy%20Rights/filename/constitutionallaw_1_91&quot;&gt;summary of the case for your perusal pleasure&lt;/a&gt;. Also worth remembering are the &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/abortion_Laura_Bush010119.html&quot;&gt;ambiguous opinions&lt;/a&gt; of the current administration on the issue.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26539</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:19:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>janeroe</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>roevwade</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>magullo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An Abortion Clinic Nightmare or An Activism Boon?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23890/An%2DAbortion%2DClinic%2DNightmare%2Dor%2DAn%2DActivism%2DBoon</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2801839.stm&quot;&gt;A Supreme Court ruling with interesting implications&lt;/a&gt;:  All lower court racketeering convictions against pro-life protestors have been effectively overturned.  Operation Rescue is quite free to harass patients and blockade clinics again.  Is this a major dent in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saveroe.com/&quot;&gt;campaign to save &lt;i&gt;Roe vs. Wade&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;?  Or does this open up new possibilities for activists of all stripes?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23890</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:59:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>activism</category>
		<category>activist</category>
		<category>blockade</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>clinic</category>
		<category>conviction</category>
		<category>nightmare</category>
		<category>operationrescue</category>
		<category>patients</category>
		<category>prolife</category>
		<category>racketeering</category>
		<category>roe</category>
		<category>roevwade</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>wade</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14583/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://pewforum.org/deathpenalty/resources/transcript3.php3"&gt;Scalia: Think the dealth penalty wrong? Resign&lt;/a&gt; In particular, he says, any Catholic jurist who agrees with the Vatican&apos;s anti-death penalty stance should resign. One to raise an eyebrow over, given that Scalia - a jurist who just happens to be Catholic - has been a consistent foe of &lt;i&gt;Roe v. Wade &lt;/i&gt; and legalized abortion. He says his opposition to &lt;i&gt;Roe&lt;/i&gt;, however, is mainly legal, and adds that his religious views should play no role in his decisions.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14583</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2002 20:31:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Abortion</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>DeathPenalty</category>
		<category>Roe</category>
		<category>RoeVWade</category>
		<category>Scalia</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>Vatican</category>
		<category>Wade</category>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2185/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.barf.org/articles/0080/"&gt;I hope this isn&apos;t true.&lt;/a&gt; Apparently (at least according to this article) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1998/roe.wade/&quot;&gt;Norma McCorvey&lt;/a&gt; is in with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ao/20000524/cr/neo-nazi_kidnap_suspect_hides_in_the_wild_1.html&quot;&gt;Christian Identity&lt;/a&gt; folks. You know, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apbnews.com/newscenter/breakingnews/2000/05/19/supremacist0519_01.html&quot;&gt;these guys&lt;/a&gt;.

Wow, times do change, don&apos;t they?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2185</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2000 08:58:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>NormaMcCorvey</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>roevwade</category>
		<dc:creator>Ezrael</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


