<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with abortion and us</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/abortion+us</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'abortion' and 'us' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:01:53 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:01:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Stag Party</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/114273/Stag%2DParty</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/gop-women-problem-2012-4/&quot;&gt;The GOP&#8217;s woman problem is that it has a serious problem with women.&lt;/a&gt; Frank Rich on George Stephanopoulos&apos;s unanswered question,  how the Republicans have shifted to being the party of misogyny since the 70s, and why Mitt Romney would be just as bad as Rick Santorum.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2012:site.114273</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:01:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2012</category>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>birthControl</category>
		<category>contraception</category>
		<category>Election</category>
		<category>Family</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>fertility</category>
		<category>FrankRich</category>
		<category>GeorgeStephanopoulos</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>misogyny</category>
		<category>MittRomney</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>RickSantorum</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>thepill</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>warOnWomen</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;On Behalf Of Governor Rick Perry, May I Welome You To Your Compulsory Transvaginal Exam...&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/113818/On%2DBehalf%2DOf%2DGovernor%2DRick%2DPerry%2DMay%2DI%2DWelome%2DYou%2DTo%2DYour%2DCompulsory%2DTransvaginal%2DExam</link>
		<description> &lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#8220;For some reason, the GOP has chosen 2012 to relitigate reproductive freedom, an issue that was resolved decades ago.  Why [Rick] Santorum, [Rush] Limbaugh et al. thought this would be a good time to declare war on half the electorate, I cannot say. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/doonesbury-creator-garry-trudeau-discusses-divisive-strips-about-abortion/2012/03/11/gIQAL7Is5R_story.html&quot;&gt;But to ignore it would have been comedy malpractice.&lt;/a&gt;&#8221; -- Gary Trudeau&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt; &quot;Only once in the long history of &quot;Doonesbury&quot; has Garry Trudeau&#8217;s syndicate ever intensely objected to one of his story arcs. It was 1985, a documentary purporting to show the reactions of a fetus had been released, and Trudeau satirized the film &quot;The Silent Scream&quot; with his own &#8220;prequel&quot; strips featuring &#8220;little Timmy,&#8221; a 12-minute-old embryo. Those strips never saw wide release in newspapers.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/comic-riffs/post/the-doonesbury-interview-garry-trudeau-says-to-ignore-abortion-debate-would-have-been-comedy-malpractice/2012/03/09/gIQAjTHy1R_blog.html&quot;&gt;Now, Trudeau has decided to take on the abortion wars head-on for the first time in &quot;Doonesbury&#8217;s&quot; four decades&lt;/a&gt; in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17gbnyv0yzhevjpg/original.jpg&quot;&gt;series of strips depicting mandatory vaginal ultrasounds as rape.&lt;/a&gt;&quot; Slate has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/archive/2012/03/12&quot;&gt;yesterday&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/archive/2012/03/13&quot;&gt;today&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; strips in color. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/blowback&quot;&gt;Reader responses on Trudeau&apos;s Blowback Blog at Slate have been mixed.&lt;/a&gt;  Romanesko has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://jimromenesko.com/2012/03/09/report-some-papers-wont-be-running-next-weeks-doonesbury-strips/&quot;&gt;description / transcript&lt;/a&gt; of the strips. 

Catherine Frazier, press secretary for Texas governor Rick Perry: &lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inquisitr.com/203152/doonesbury-comic-strip-on-abortion-being-moved-by-some-newspapers/&quot;&gt;The decision to end a life isn&#8217;t funny,&#8221; Frazier said. &#8220;There is nothing comic about this tasteless interpretation of legislation we have passed in Texas to ensure that women have all the facts when making a life-ending decision.&lt;/a&gt;&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

Reuters: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/10/entertainment-us-doonesbury-abortion-idUSBRE8281F720120310&quot;&gt;Author defends &quot;Doonesbury&quot; abortion strip.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/11/doonesbury-strip-texas-abortion-law?newsfeed=true&quot;&gt;Doonesbury strip on Texas abortion law dropped by some US newspapers&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/comic-riffs/post/doonesbury-next-weeks-abortion-strips-pulled-by-at-least-one-paper/2012/03/06/gIQAyTLc1R_blog.html&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://jimromenesko.com/2012/03/12/top-reasons-why-newspapers-arent-running-this-weeks-doonesbury/&quot;&gt;Reasons being given&lt;/a&gt;. The CT Journal Register: &lt;a href=&quot;http://connecticutnewsroom.wordpress.com/2012/03/10/of-course-were-running-doonesbury-next-week/&quot;&gt;Of course we&apos;re running Doonesbury next week&lt;/a&gt;. NY Daily News: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/doonesbury-abortion-comic-strips-newspapers-partisans-divided-article-1.1038137&quot;&gt;Doonesbury&#8217; abortion comic strips have newspapers, partisans divided&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2012:site.113818</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:26:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>doonesbury</category>
		<category>perry</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>texas</category>
		<category>trudeau</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Abortion Not OK in OK</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/91537/Abortion%2DNot%2DOK%2Din%2DOK</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/202373/Oklahomas_unconscionable_new_abortion_laws"&gt;Provoking pro-choice advocates,&lt;/a&gt; Oklahoma passed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/28/us/28abortion.html&quot;&gt;two highly restrictive abortion laws&lt;/a&gt; on Tuesday. &lt;a href=&quot;http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/2009-10bills/HB/HB2780_ENR.RTF&quot;&gt;One&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(rtf file)&lt;/small&gt; requires doctors to show women an ultrasound of their fetus and point out its physical characteristics &#8212; even if the patient was impregnated through rape or incest.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/2009-10HB/HB2656_int.rtf&quot;&gt;second&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(rtf file)&lt;/small&gt; stipulates that doctors cannot be sued if they decide to lie to an expectant mother regarding her baby&apos;s birth defects.  A third &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126308988&quot;&gt;requires clinics to post signs&lt;/a&gt; telling patients they cannot be forced to have an abortion.  The first law &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsok.com/new-oklahoma-abortion-law-faces-battle/article/3457384&quot;&gt;prompted&lt;/a&gt; an immediate &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsok.com/hearing-set-on-abortion-lawsuit/article/3457614&quot;&gt;lawsuit&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=16&amp;articleid=20100429_16_A1_Theonl668772&quot;&gt;Tulsa&apos;s only abortion clinic&lt;/a&gt;. Reactions: 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=12394175&quot;&gt;Oklahoma Patients&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/04/28/carr.abortion.oklahoma/index.html?hpt=T2&quot;&gt;National Institutes of Reproductive Health&lt;/a&gt;

The Week: &lt;a href=&quot;http://theweek.com/article/index/202399/Americas_5_strictest_abortion_laws&quot;&gt;America&apos;s Five Strictest Abortion Laws&lt;/a&gt;

Alternet: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/146662/&quot;&gt;Shocking Law&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/83454/&quot;&gt;Women Seeking Abortions Must Have Ultrasounds Against Their Will&lt;/a&gt;

Mary Spaulding Balch, Director of the Department of State Legislation at the National Right to Life Committee &lt;small&gt;(This quote only addresses the first law)&lt;/small&gt;: &lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;This is a victory for the women of Oklahoma and their unborn children. Abortion is a business, the least time spent with a woman, the least information given to her, the more sales made. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lifenews.com/state5036.html&quot;&gt;This law protects a mother&apos;s right to know something about her developing unborn child.&lt;/a&gt; It gives her a window to her womb. It help to prevent her from making a decision she may regret for the rest of her life and it empowers her with the most accurate information about her pregnancy so that she can make a truly informed &apos;choice&apos;.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.91537</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:42:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>birthdefects</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>fundamentalism</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>hippocraticoath</category>
		<category>hypocrisy</category>
		<category>incest</category>
		<category>informedconsent</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>OK</category>
		<category>oklahoma</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>pregnancy</category>
		<category>prochoice</category>
		<category>prolife</category>
		<category>rape</category>
		<category>reproduction</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>roe</category>
		<category>RoevWade</category>
		<category>selectivereduction</category>
		<category>transparency</category>
		<category>tulsa</category>
		<category>ultrasounds</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>veto</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Black Genocide&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/89690/Black%2DGenocide</link>
		<description> In the US, the conservative movement&#8217;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/27/us/27race.html&quot;&gt;latest rallying cry against abortion&lt;/a&gt; claims pro-choice groups are conducting a systematic &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/databank/entries/dh23eu.html&quot;&gt;eugenics&lt;/a&gt; campaign to turn African Americans into an &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.toomanyaborted.com/&quot;&gt;endangered species&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  The idea is &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/WN/billboard-controversy-signs-atlanta-black-children-endangered-species/story?id=9888149&quot;&gt;finding renewed traction and condemnation in Black communities.&lt;/a&gt;   Several bloggers at RHRealityCheck &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/03/01/abortion-women-color-bigger-picture&quot;&gt;are&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/02/12/women-color-and-antichoice-focus-eugenics&quot;&gt;offering&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/02/18/black-abortion-breaking-silence&quot;&gt;counter&lt;/a&gt;-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/02/18/stop-perpetuating-myths-about-black-women-and-abortion&quot;&gt;arguments&lt;/a&gt;. From the ABC link: &lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/WN/billboard-controversy-signs-atlanta-black-children-endangered-species/story?id=9888149&quot;&gt;To the surprise of many&lt;/a&gt;, the anti-abortionists behind the billboards are black themselves and say they were motivated by a record number of abortions among black women. Of the 36,094 women in Georgia who had abortions in 2008, nearly 21,000 were African-American, more than twice the number of white women. Nationally, the CDC says black women are still three times more likely than white women to get an abortion.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;   YouTube version of the ABC World News segment is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V78B0iwrjWc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.89690</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:52:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>africanamerican</category>
		<category>antichoice</category>
		<category>christian</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>ethnicities</category>
		<category>eugenics</category>
		<category>georgia</category>
		<category>maafa21</category>
		<category>minorities</category>
		<category>plannedparenthood</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ppfa</category>
		<category>pregnancy</category>
		<category>prochoice</category>
		<category>prolife</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>racism</category>
		<category>radiancefoundation</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cloture for Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40297/Cloture%2Dfor%2DBankruptcy%2DAbuse%2DPrevention%2Dand%2DConsumer%2DProtection%2DAct%2Dof%2D2005</link>
		<description> A &lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN256:&quot;&gt;Senate bill&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doney.net/bra/flowchart.htm&quot;&gt;overhaul&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/bankruptcy.html&quot;&gt;federal bankruptcy &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/11/toc.html&quot;&gt;laws&lt;/a&gt;, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.business-journal.com/BankruptcyBill.asp&quot;&gt;top priority&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050308/dctu070_1.html&quot;&gt;retailers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opensecrets.org/alerts/v6/alertv6_54a.asp&quot;&gt;auto lenders&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aba.com/Industry+Issues/Bankruptcy_Reform_Main_Menu.htm&quot;&gt;banks&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxstreet.com/nou/noticies/afx/noticia.asp?pv_noticia=1110312991-d8260f08-44554&quot;&gt;cleared a key hurdle&lt;/a&gt; Tuesday afternoon. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00029&quot;&gt;Sixty-nine senators&lt;/a&gt; -- nine more than needed -- voted for &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloture&quot;&gt;cloture&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; a procedural move that limits debate. &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.morningstar.com/news/DJ/M03/D04/200503041739DOWJONESDJONLINE001006.html&quot;&gt;Republican leaders&lt;/a&gt; hope to push the bill to a final vote by the end of the week. Earlier, the Senate &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00028&quot;&gt;turned back&lt;/a&gt; a controversial, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=%5CPolitics%5Carchive%5C200503%5CPOL20050308b.html&quot;&gt;abortion&lt;/a&gt;-&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wcla.org/00-summer/bankruptcy.html&quot;&gt;related&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doney.net/bra/523.htm#523(a)(19)&quot;&gt;amendment&lt;/a&gt; that has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prolifeaction.org/news/200212/bankruptcy.htm&quot;&gt;scuttled &lt;a href=&quot;http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/judiciary/hju52831.000/hju52831_0f.htm&quot;&gt;p&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/judiciary/hju62437.000/hju62437_0f.htm&quot;&gt;r&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://library.lp.findlaw.com/articles/file/00088/005407/title/Subject/topic/Bankruptcy_Preferences/filename/bankruptcy_2_547&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:HR00333:@@@T&quot;&gt;v&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abanet.org/poladv/letters/107th/bankruptcy042202.html&quot;&gt;i&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:HR00975:@@@T&quot;&gt;o&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&amp;db_id=cp108&amp;r_n=hr407.108&amp;sel=TOC_2516&amp;&quot;&gt;u&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-256&quot;&gt;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opensecrets.org/news/bankruptcy/&quot;&gt;efforts&lt;/a&gt; to pass &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bankruptcy#Bankruptcy_Abuse_Prevention_.26_Consumer_Protection_Act_of_2005&quot;&gt;bankruptcy legislation&lt;/a&gt;. The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005  was first introduced in &lt;a href=&quot;http://grassley.senate.gov/releases/1998/p8r05-23.htm&quot;&gt;1998&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   as The Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40297</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:09:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>bankruptcy</category>
		<category>cloture</category>
		<category>consumer</category>
		<category>creditcard</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>airguitar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Turning the tables on Anti-Choice Protesters</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38088/Turning%2Dthe%2Dtables%2Don%2DAntiChoice%2DProtesters</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/articles/041217-ipp-picket.html"&gt;Turning Pickets Into Pledges&lt;/a&gt; Planned Parenthood has launched a new program that &quot;creates a no-win situation for anti-choice protesters &#8212; the more picketers who demonstrate outside a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plannedparenthood.org/&quot;&gt;Planned Parenthood&lt;/a&gt; clinic, the more donations that clinic receives.&quot;   This campaign allows supporters to pledge between 25 cents and one dollar per protester -- not a lot of money, but it adds up to thousands over time.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38088</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:20:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>choice</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>donations</category>
		<category>plannedparenthood</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>protest</category>
		<category>protesters</category>
		<category>protests</category>
		<category>reproduction</category>
		<category>reproductiverights</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>womensrights</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


