<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with academia and feminism</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/academia+feminism</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'academia' and 'feminism' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:34:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:34:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Choices, constraints, and the &apos;mommy track.&apos;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67090/Choices%2Dconstraints%2Dand%2Dthe%2Dmommy%2Dtrack</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://scatter.wordpress.com/2007/12/01/choices-consequences-constraints/"&gt;Insightful, sociological, bitter:&lt;/a&gt; A scholar reflects back on her entry into the academic &apos;mommy track.&apos; An interesting blend of meditation-on-resentment and just-plain-resentment, worth a read both intentionally and un-. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://crookedtimber.org/2007/12/02/choice-and-social-structure&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;] As the poster (&lt;strong&gt;olderwoman&lt;/strong&gt;) points out in her first comment, the post nearly/neatly glosses over the fact that it&apos;s written from the perspective of a &lt;em&gt;tenured&lt;/em&gt; academic. Her post - not quite an &apos;essay,&apos; thanks - interests me for several reasons: it&apos;s emblematic of the limitations and bizarre literary blind spots of online confession/analysis by scholars; it doesn&apos;t flinch in describing the anger and (self-/hubby-)loathing baked into so many relationships, affluent and otherwise; it might be a deliciously reflexive demonstration of the nature of self-righteousness or a run-of-the-mill example of it, or something uneasily situated halfway between. I wouldn&apos;t actually call this &apos;best of the web&apos; in aesthetic, scholarly, or confessional terms, but something about its ironies appeals to me. The scholarly blogosphere isn&apos;t well represented on MeFi, so there you go.

Incidentally, if you have an eye for academic blogs in general, follow the &apos;via&apos; link to Crooked Timber, one of the best academic group blogs for several years running. A bit predictable in its politics sometimes, but then isn&apos;t everyone? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67090</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:34:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academia</category>
		<category>blogpostasslomotrainwreck</category>
		<category>constraints</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>mommytrack</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<dc:creator>waxbanks</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Liberals, Womens&apos; Studies, and Kos.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42770/Liberals%2DWomens%2DStudies%2Dand%2DKos</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://preposterousuniverse.blogspot.com/2005_06_01_preposterousuniverse_archive.html#111851897886373720"&gt;Liberals, Womens&apos; Studies, Beer Ads, and Kos.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42770</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 04:19:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academia</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>Tlogmer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Hypothesis as thought-crime</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39180/Hypothesis%2Das%2Dthoughtcrime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/0000000CA8A7.htm"&gt;Hypothesis as thought-crime&lt;/a&gt; ...Now, however, a new brouhaha has erupted [at Harvard]and it seems impossible that Summers [the president]will emerge from this one without serious erosion of his moral authority. The trigger was a statement he made at a conference, suggesting that the reason there are more men than women in the mathematical sciences at top-flight institutions has to do with a small statistical difference in inate ability, which becomes a pretty large disparity when one looks at the &apos;high end&apos; of the respective distribution curves...

 
The fatal words did not set forth his main theme, but merely constituted a brief aside, thoroughly hedged and qualified. Nonetheless, they touched off a firestorm of indignation, the most striking aspect of which was the intemperate response of a number of feminist scientists, who offered no counter-arguments, but simply declared the whole idea misogynistic and therefore forbidden intellectual territory.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39180</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:10:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academia</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>harvard</category>
		<category>larrysummers</category>
		<category>math</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>If they can&apos;t even play with trucks correctly...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38721/If%2Dthey%2Dcant%2Deven%2Dplay%2Dwith%2Dtrucks%2Dcorrectly</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2005/01/17/summers_remarks_on_women_draw_fire?pg=full"&gt;&quot;In his talk... [Harvard President Larry] Summers also used as an example one of his daughters, who as a child was given two trucks in an effort at gender-neutral parenting.&lt;/a&gt; Yet she treated them almost like dolls, naming one of them &apos;daddy truck,&apos; and one &apos;baby truck.&apos;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

&quot;It was during his comments on ability that Hopkins, sitting only 10 feet from Summers, closed her computer, put on her coat, and walked out. &apos;It is so upsetting that all these brilliant young women [at Harvard] are being led by a man who views them this way,&apos; she said later in an interview.&quot;

Summers then responded with the currently &lt;a href=http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/13998&gt;in vogue&lt;/a&gt; non-apology &lt;a href=http://news.com.com/Harvard+chief+defends+talk+on+women,+science/2100-7337_3-5540130.html&gt; apology&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38721</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:48:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academia</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>DNA</category>
		<category>engineering</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>Harvard</category>
		<category>LarrySummers</category>
		<category>naturevsnurture</category>
		<category>politicalcorrectness</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>occhiblu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


